岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1483-1491.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1173

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合

谌文武1, 2,贾全全1,童艳梅1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-04 修回日期:2019-09-10 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 作者简介:谌文武,男,1966年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、岩土工程和文物保护工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技重大专项(No. 18ZD2FA001)

Measurement and curve fitting for soil-waterer characteristic curve of mural plaster at Mogao Grottoes

CHEN Wen-wu1, 2, JIA Quan-quan1, TONG Yan-mei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2019-07-04 Revised:2019-09-10 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Proiect of Science and Technology of Gansu Province (18ZD2FA001).

摘要: 壁画的病害对壁画的长期保存和日常维护造成了极大的威胁,水带动易溶盐的迁移是导致壁画病害最主要的原因之一。地仗层作为壁画最直接的载体,其土-水特性关乎着壁画病害的形成与发育。为了研究壁画地仗层的土-水特性,根据莫高窟壁画地仗的物质组成制作了模拟地仗,采用压力板法和蒸汽平衡法分别对模拟地仗进行土-水特性试验,获得了全吸力范围的壁画地仗的土-水特征曲线,并用Van Genuchten(VG)模型和Fredlund-Xing(FX)模型对土-水特征曲线进行拟合。试验结果表明:不同组分的模拟地仗试样的土-水特征曲线有所差异,粗泥层与细泥层土-水特征曲线形态上差异并不明显;同等吸力下粗泥层含水率高于细泥层,在高吸力段粗泥层具有突变性释水的特点;对高吸力段地仗试样土-水特征曲线变化趋势的分析表明,在日常维护中莫高窟洞窟内湿度不应高于58%,湿度宜保持稳定,不应有较大波动;综合全吸力段上的试验数据进行拟合可以获得精度较高的壁画地仗的土-水特征拟合曲线。

关键词: 莫高窟, 壁画地仗, 土-水特征曲线, 压力板法, 蒸汽平衡法, 全吸力段

Abstract: Mural plaster deterioration poses great threat to the long-term preservation and daily maintenance. The migration of soluble salts by moisture movement is one of the most important factors that causes mural plaster deterioration. The plaster plays an important role in supporting the murals. The soil-water characteristic of the mural plaster is related to the formation and development of mural deterioration. In order to study the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) of mural plaster in full suction range, laboratory reconstituted plasters were prepared by the same materials as the mural plaster in Mogao Grottoes, and the pressure plate test method and vapor equilibrium technique were employed. The SWCC test data was fitted by van Genuchten (VG) model and Fredlund Xing (FX) model. The SWCC of the reconstituted plaster samples with different compositions showed different characteristics, while the morphological differences between the coarse plaster and the fine plaster on the SWCC were not obvious. Under the same suction condition, the moisture content of the coarse plaster is higher than that of the fine plaster, and the coarse plaster has the characteristics of rapid release of moisture in the high suction range. By analyzing the trend of the SWCC in the high suction range, it is recommended that the humidity in the Mogao Grottoes should not exceed 58% in daily maintenance, and the humidity should be stable with no major fluctuations. Based on the experimental data in the full suction range, highly accurate SWCC can be obtained.

Key words: Mogao Grottoes, mural plaster, soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), pressure plate method, vapor equilibrium technique, full suction range

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 刘倩倩, 李舰, 蔡国庆, 李朋林, 李昕哲, . 全吸力范围的盐渍土持水特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 713-722.
[2] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[3] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[4] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[5] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[6] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[7] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[8] 陶高梁,柏 亮,袁 波,甘世朝. 土-水特征曲线与核磁共振曲线的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 943-948.
[9] 黎澄生,孔令伟,柏 巍,安 然,李甜果, . 土-水特征曲线滞后阻塞模型[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 598-604.
[10] 刘星志,刘小文,陈 铭,谷明晗. 基于3个不等粒径颗粒接触模型的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 651-656.
[11] 方瑾瑾,冯以鑫,邵生俊,. 真三轴条件下原状Q3黄土的土-水特征[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2597-2604.
[12] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[13] 杜建国 ,郭士旭,陈 沛,郭青林,陈晋央,余尚江,. 莫高窟壁画裂隙萌生特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 19-25.
[14] 黄启迪,赵成刚,蔡国庆,. 基于热力学并考虑体变及滞回效应的土-水特征曲线模型[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1857-1867.
[15] 曹春山 ,吴树仁 ,潘 懋,梁昌玉,. 工程切坡诱发黄土滑坡成因机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1049-1060.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[3] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[4] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[5] 陈中学,汪 稔,胡明鉴,魏厚振,王新志. 云南东川蒋家沟泥石流形成内因初探[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3053 -3056 .
[6] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[7] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[8] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[9] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[10] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .