岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2119-2126.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0398

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数

李建朋,高岭,母焕胜   

  1. 河北省交通规划设计院,河北 石家庄 050011
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-21 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 作者简介:李建朋,男,1982年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩石力学与地质灾害评价与防治方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    河北省交通运输厅科技项目(No.20130012)

Dilatancy characteristics of sandstone and its function of dilatancy angle under high confining pressure and unloading conditions

LI Jian-peng, GAO Ling, MU Huan-sheng   

  1. Hebei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institue, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China)
  • Received:2018-03-21 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Hebei Provincial Transportation Department(20130012).

摘要: 为研究高应力水平条件下岩石卸荷扩容特性及其剪胀角变化规律,开展了若干不同初始围压水平的三轴峰前卸围压试验,同时进行了相应围压水平的常规三轴压缩试验。基于试验成果分析了卸荷应力路径对砂岩扩容的影响效应,总结了卸荷应力路径下剪胀角变化规律,进而提出了基于卸荷应力路径的剪胀角函数,并给出了其数值实现方法,最后通过对三轴峰前卸围压试验的数值模拟,验证了所提出的剪涨角函数的可行性与合理性。研究表明:(1)加载路径时,不同围压水平下峰前扩容体积应变值相差不大,而卸荷应力路径时,随着围压水平的增加,峰前扩容体积应变从最小值3.15×10?3增加到最大值9.65×10?3,卸荷路径下的峰前扩容体积应变约为加载路径的1.1~4.0倍;(2)卸荷应力路径下偏应力峰值对应的体积应变基本为0或接近于0,而加载应力路径下偏应力峰值对应的体积应变均为负值;(3)卸荷应力路径条件下峰前扩容体积应变在总扩容体积应变中所占比例显著大于加载路径;(4)两种应力路径下,剪胀角随塑性剪切应变增加均经历了先增加后减小的过程,并且低围压工况下偏应力峰值对应的剪胀角和最大剪胀角均大于高围压工况;(5)与加载路径相比,卸荷路径下的剪胀角更快达到剪胀角最大值,并且其偏应力峰值对应的剪胀角和最大剪胀角更大;(6)基于砂岩三轴卸荷试验成果,采用线性拟合方法得出了以围压和峰后塑性剪切应变增量为自变量的剪胀角函数,基于该函数与应变软化本构模型的砂岩三轴峰前卸围压试验的数值模拟结果与试验结果吻合较好,表明该函数能较好地描述三轴峰前卸围压条件下砂岩的扩容特性。以上结论可为深部地下工程变形预测、稳定性分析与支护设计提供理论基础。

关键词: 扩容, 剪胀角, 卸荷, 高应力, 三轴试验

Abstract: This study is aimed to investigate the unloading and dilatancy characteristics of rock under high-stress level and the variation law of the dilatancy angle. A series of triaxial pre-peak unloading confining pressure tests was carried out at different initial confining pressure levels, and the conventional triaxial compression tests were also conducted at corresponding confining pressure levels. Based on the experimental results, the effect of the unloading stress path on the dilatancy characteristics of sandstone was analysed, the variation law of dilatancy angle under the unloading stress path was summarized as well. Moreover, the dilatancy angle function under the unloading stress path was proposed, and its numerical realisation method was established. Finally, the feasibility and rationality of the proposed dilatancy angle function was verified by the numerical simulation of the triaxial pre-peak unloading confining pressure tests. Under different confining pressure levels, the volumetric strain values of pre-peak dilatation were similar under the loading paths. While under the unloading stress paths, the volumetric strain of pre-peak dilatation increased from the minimum value of 3.15×10?3 to the maximum value of 9.65×10?3 with increasing the confining pressure level. The volumetric strain of pre-peak dilatation under the unloading path was about 1.1-4.0 times than that under the loading path. The volumetric strain corresponding to the peak of the deviatoric stress was substantially zero or close to zero under the unloading condition, while the volumetric strain was negative under the loading condition. Under the unloading stress path condition, the proportion of the volume expansion strain before the peak of deviatoric stress in the total volume expansion strain was significantly larger than that under the loading path. The dilatancy angle firstly increased and then decreased with increasing the plastic shear strain under the two stress paths. Under lower confining pressure conditions, both the maximum dilatancy angle and the dilatancy angle corresponding to the peak were greater than those under the higher confining pressure conditions. Compared with the loading path, the dilatancy angle reached the maximum value faster, and the maximum dilatancy angle and the dilatancy angle corresponding to the peak were larger under the unloading path. According to the unloading test results, the linear fitting method was used to establish the dilatancy angle function with the confining pressure and post-peak plastic shear strain as independent variables. The experimental results showed good agreements with the simulation results from the established function and the strain softening constitutive model under the unloading path. The results indicate that the function can better describe the expansion characteristics of sandstone under the conditions of the triaxial pre-peak unloading path. This study can provide a theoretical basis for deformation prediction, stability analysis and support design of deep underground engineering.

Key words: dilatation, dilatancy angle, unloading, high stress, triaxial test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧 隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[3] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[4] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[5] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[6] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[7] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[8] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[9] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[10] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[11] 赵军, 郭广涛, 徐鼎平, 黄翔, 胡偲, 夏跃林, 张頔. 三轴及循环加卸载应力路径下深埋 硬岩变形破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1521-1530.
[12] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[13] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[14] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[15] 周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!