岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 3855-3870.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1420

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

陇东Q3结构性黄土压剪损伤本构模型试验研究

褚峰1,张宏刚2,邵生俊3   

  1. 1. 西安工程大学 城市规划与市政工程学院,陕西 西安 710048;2. 中煤科工集团西安研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710077; 3. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-01 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-19
  • 作者简介:禇峰,男,1982年生,博士,讲师,主要从事黄土力学与工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41272320);西安工程大学博士科研启动基金(No. BS1705)

Experimental study of constitutive model of Longdong Q3 structural loess with compressive and shearing damage

CHU Feng1, ZHANG Hong-gang2, SHAO Sheng-jun3   

  1. 1. School of Urban Planning and Municipal Engineering, Xi’an Polytechnic University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Xi’an Research Institute, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corporation, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710077, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • Received:2018-08-01 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272320) and the Doctoral Research Fund of XPU (BS1705).

摘要: Q3黄土在我国西北地区分布广泛,且大部分都具有显著的结构性。随着国家“一带一路”倡议的不断向前推进,作为丝路沿线的西北黄土分布地区将迎来新的建设大潮。黄土的结构变形特性非常复杂,深入研究黄土在压缩、剪切条件下的结构损伤变形特性,并依此构建黄土的本构关系在理论研究及现场工程应用中具有非常重要的意义。通过对黄土进行均等压缩试验及三轴剪切试验,基于损伤力学思想,提出黄土结构在均等压缩条件下的平均正应力损伤比,在剪切条件下的平均正应力损伤比及偏应力损伤比。根据弹性、塑性应变确定塑性势线,进而确定其屈服函数;将确定的黄土结构损伤比引入到屈服函数中,得到一定结构损伤时黄土的屈服函数表达式;验证了选取塑性体应变作为本构模型硬化参量的合理性;根据硬化参量与相关试验参数的联系,推导出结构性黄土在压剪条件下的损伤本构模型。经过实测应力-应变曲线与本构模型推算得到的应力-应变曲线对比可知,所建立的本构模型可以较好地反映黄土在压剪条件下结构损伤演化变形过程,具有较好的工程应用前景。

关键词: 结构性黄土, 损伤力学, 损伤比, 屈服面, 本构模型

Abstract: The Q3 loess is widely distributed in the northwest of China, and most of them present significant structural characteristics. With the development of the national “The Belt and Road” Initiative, as the northwest loess areas along the silk road will usher in a new tide of construction. The structural deformation characteristics of loess are very complex. In-depth study of the structural damage and deformation characteristics of loess under compression and shearing conditions is of great significance for constructing the constitutive relation of loess in theoretical research and field engineering application. Through the three-axis isotropic compression test and the three-axis shear test, the ball stress damage ratio of the loess structure, the ball stress damage ratio and the shear stress damage ratio are proposed. According to the elastic and plastic strain of the plastic potential line, and its yield function, the damage ratio of loess is introduced to the yield function, and expressed under structural damage. The rationality of selecting the plastic volumetric strain as the hardening parameter is verified. According to the relationship between hardening parameter and the test parameters, damage constitutive model of structural loess under the condition of compression and shear is derived. By comparing the measured stress-strain curves with the calculation from the constitutive model, we can see that the constitutive model can better reflect the structural damage evolution and deformation process of loess under compression and shearing condition.

Key words: structural loess, damage mechanics, damage ratio, yield surface, constitutive model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 444
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[7] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[8] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[9] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[10] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[11] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[12] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[13] 张超, 杨期君, 曹文贵. 考虑峰值后区应力跌落速率的 脆岩损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3099-3106.
[14] 张凌凯, 王睿, 张建民, 唐新军, . 考虑颗粒破碎效应的堆石料静动力本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
[15] 汪俊敏, 熊勇林, 杨骐莱, 桑琴扬, 黄强. 不饱和土动弹塑性本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2323-2331.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!