岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 237-245.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0774

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑软岩强度时效弱化的缓冲层让压支护设计研究

田云1, 2,陈卫忠1, 3,田洪铭1,赵明4,曾春涛4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061;4. 保利长大工程有限公司,广东 广州 510000
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-28 修回日期:2019-08-24 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈卫忠,男,1968年生,博士,研究员、博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学及研究工作。E-mail: wzchen@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:tianyun16@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:田云,女,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事软岩隧道变形机理及控制技术方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51879258,No.51879259);湖北省自然科学基金项目(No.2018CFA012);中国科学院青年创新促进会资助项目。

Study on design of buffer layer yielding support considering time-effect weakening of soft rock strength

TIAN Yun1, 2, CHEN Wei-zhong1, 3, TIAN Hong-ming1, ZHAO Ming4, ZENG Chun-tao4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 4. Paulie growth Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
  • Received:2019-04-28 Revised:2019-08-24 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51879258, 51879259), Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2018CFA012), and Project funded by Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS.

摘要: 深埋隧道软弱岩体往往具有明显的流变特性和时效弱化效应,隧道开挖后围岩参数随时间的增加逐渐降低,导致围岩流变变形增大,容易造成隧道初期支护和二次衬砌开裂,严重影响隧道施工期及运营期安全。为保证隧道安全,在二次衬砌与围岩之间设置能够吸收围岩流变变形的缓冲层,缓冲层材料具有理想弹塑性特性,其特殊的力学特性使其能够实现与围岩的变形协调,吸收围岩长期变形能,实现软弱隧道围岩的长期稳定。近年来缓冲层让压支护设计逐渐得到众多学者和工程建设单位的认可,但缓冲层让压支护并没有得到广泛应用,原因是让压支护的让压量与让压力的设计一直是工程建设中的难点。基于弹塑性理论,考虑围岩参数的时效弱化和缓冲层支护抗力,提出软岩隧道工程缓冲层让压支护参数的设计方法,并通过V级软岩隧道的支护设计,验证所提缓冲层支护方案的合理性。

关键词: 软岩, 时效弱化, 让压支护, 缓冲层, 支护参数

Abstract: The soft rock mass of deep-buried tunnel often has obvious rheological characteristics and time-weakening effect. After excavation, the parameters of surrounding rock gradually decrease with time, resulting in the increase of rheological deformation of surrounding rock, which easily leads to the cracking of first lining and secondary lining of tunnel, and seriously affects the safety of tunnel construction and operation period. In order to ensure safety of the tunnel, a buffer layer is set between secondary lining and surrounding rock, which can absorb rheological deformation of surrounding rock. The buffer layer has ideal elastic-plastic characteristics. Its special mechanical characteristics make it compatible with deformation of surrounding rock, absorbing long-term deformation energy of surrounding rock, and realizing the long-term stability of soft tunnel surrounding rock. Therefore, in recent years, the design of buffer layer yielding support has gradually been recognized by many scholars and engineering construction units, but at present, buffer layer yielding support has not been widely used, because the design of yielding deformation and yielding stress of buffer layer support has always been a difficulty in engineering construction. Based on elastic-plastic theory, the design method of buffer layer yielding support for tunnel engineering is proposed considering the time-effect weakening of surrounding rock parameters and the resistance of buffer layer support. The rationality of the buffer layer yielding support is verified by the support design of V-grade soft rock tunnel.

Key words: soft rock, aging weakening, yielding support, buffer layer, parameters of support

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[2] 雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.
[3] 周翠英, 孔令华, 崔光俊, 于磊, 刘镇, . 基于天然红层材料的软岩成型模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 419-427.
[4] 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇, . 红层软岩压缩破坏的分形特征与级联失效过程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 21-31.
[5] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[6] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[7] 周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[8] 储昭飞, 刘保国, 任大瑞, 宋宇, 马强, . 软岩流变相似材料的研制及物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2172-2182.
[9] 杨骐莱, 熊勇林, 张 升, 刘干斌, 郑荣跃, 张 锋, . 考虑温度影响的软岩弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1898-1906.
[10] 孙广臣, 谢佳佑, 何 山, 傅鹤林, 江学良, 郑 亮, . 不同方向地震激励下软岩桥隧 搭接段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 893-902.
[11] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 雷 江, 于洪丹, 邢天海, 郑有雷, 贾晓东, . 并联型软岩温度-渗流-应力耦合三轴流变仪的研制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1213-1220.
[12] 杨秀荣,姜谙男,江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[13] 刘 镇,周翠英,陆仪启,林振镇, . 软岩水-力耦合的流变损伤多尺度力学试验系统的研制[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3077-3086.
[14] 许宏发,柏 准,齐亮亮,耿汉生,马林建,刘 斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[15] 吴顺川,韩 伟,陈 钒,徐淼斐,丛子杰,. 基于膨胀本构的石膏岩隧道衬砌缓冲层厚度优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1182-1191.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!