岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 439-450.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1006

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DIC的含不同角度3D打印 粗糙交叉节理试样破裂机制研究

王本鑫1, 2,金爱兵1, 2,孙浩1, 2,王树亮1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-15 修回日期:2020-09-10 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 孙浩,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事采矿工艺与理论、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:sunhao2019@ustb.edu.cn E-mail:wang_ben_xin@163.com
  • 作者简介:王本鑫,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事节理岩体力学破裂特性、数字图像分析及数值计算方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51674015);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. FRF-TP-19-026A1);中国博士后科学基金项目(No. 2020M670138)。

Study on fracture mechanism of specimens with 3D printed rough cross joints at different angles based on DIC

WANG Ben-xin1, 2, JIN Ai-bing1, 2, SUN Hao1, 2, WANG Shu-liang1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-07-15 Revised:2020-09-10 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674015), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-TP-19-026A1) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (2020M670138).

摘要: 粗糙交叉节理广泛存在于实际岩体中,含不同角度粗糙交叉节理试样的力学破裂演化特性研究对岩体工程具有重要的指导意义。基于Barton节理轮廓曲线,通过3D打印技术制作不同角度粗糙交叉节理模型,浇筑成试样后进行单轴压缩试验,并采用DIC技术对试样表面的变形特征进行了处理与分析。结果表明:主节理倾角较大试样的单轴强度基本小于主节理倾角较小试样,主次节理夹角 在45°~60°之间时对试样的单轴抗压强度和弹性模量影响最大;通过对DIC应变云图、节理尖端全程应变和应变率激增点分析可知,起裂主要发生在主节理上下端和次节理上端,起裂应力在峰值应力的90%至峰值阶段,屈服阶段裂隙扩展速度缓慢,快速扩展主要发生在峰后阶段;粗糙交叉节理试样的起裂方向与平直节理试样不同,节理尖端裂隙多以剪切形式存在,远端在最大主应力的作用下多演化为张拉裂隙;主节理下端的应力强度因子基本大于次节理上端,说明主节理对试样的破裂起主要作用,节理尖端的KII多大于KI,说明起裂扩展受剪切作用大于张拉作用。

关键词: DIC, 3D打印, 粗糙交叉节理, 破裂演化, 应力强度因子

Abstract: Rough cross joints widely exist in actual rock mass. The laboratory study on the mechanical fracture evolution of specimens with rough cross joints at different angles can provide important guidance for rock mass engineering. Based on Barton joint profile, we use 3D printing to generate rough cross joint models with different angles. Then we carry out uniaxial compressive tests after pouring the specimens. The deformation characteristics of the surface are processed and analyzed by the digital image correlation (DIC) technology. The results show that the uniaxial strength of specimens with larger dips of primary joint is less than that of specimens with smaller dips. The influence on the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of the specimen is most significant when the angle γ between the primary and secondary joints is between 45° and 60°. We analyze the obtained strain contour figures by DIC, as well as the whole range of strain of joint tips and strain rate surge points. The observations are listed as follows. The fracture initiation mainly occurs at the upper and lower ends of primary joint and the upper end of secondary joint, and the initiation stress is between 90% of the peak stress and the peak. The fracture propagation rate is slow in the yield stage, and the rapid expansion mainly occurs in the post-peak stage. The fracture initiation direction of the rough cross joint specimen is different from that of the smooth joint specimen. The fracture at the tips of joints is mostly in the form of shear, and evolves into tensile fracture under the action of maximum principal stress. The stress intensity factor at the lower end of the primary joint is larger than that at the upper end of the secondary joint, which indicates that the primary joint plays the main role in the fracture of the specimen. KII at the joint tipis is greater than KI, which indicates that the shear effect is greater than the tensile effect on the initiation and propagation of fracture.

Key words: DIC, 3D printing, rough cross joints, fracture evolution, stress intensity factors

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 黄娜, 蒋宇静, 程远方, 刘日成, . 基于3D打印技术的复杂三维粗糙裂隙网络 渗流特性试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1659-1668.
[2] 齐飞飞, 张科, 谢建斌, . 基于DIC技术的含不同节理密度类岩石试件 破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1669-1680.
[3] 许江, 宋肖徵, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 冉晓梦, 闫发志, . 基于3D-DIC技术岩石广义应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 27-38.
[4] 王本鑫, 金爱兵, 王树亮, 孙浩, . 3D打印交叉节理试件力学破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 39-49.
[5] 张科, 齐飞飞, 陈宇龙, . 基于3D打印和DIC技术的裂隙网络模型 变形破裂特征及填充物影响效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2555-2563.
[6] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[7] 金爱兵, 王树亮, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 陈帅军, 朱东风, . 基于DIC的3D打印交叉节理试件破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3862-3872.
[8] 崔溦, 邹旭, 李正, 江志安, 谢武, . 分形岩石裂隙中渗流扩散运动的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3553-3562.
[9] 彭守建, 冉晓梦, 许江, 陈灿灿, 宋肖徵, 闫发志, . 基于3D-DIC技术的砂岩变形局部化 荷载速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3591-3603.
[10] 金爱兵, 王树亮, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 赵怡晴, . 基于DIC技术的3D打印节理试件破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3214-3224.
[11] 易雪枫, 刘春康, 王宇. 金属矿尾废胶结充填体破裂演化过程 原位CT扫描试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3365-3373.
[12] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[13] 刘泉声, 何璠, 邓鹏海, 田永超. 3D打印技术在岩石物理力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3397-3404.
[14] 杨石扣, 张继勋, 任旭华, . 基于改进数值流形法的接触裂纹问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2016-2021.
[15] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[3] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[4] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[5] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[6] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[7] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[8] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .
[9] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[10] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .