岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 647-655.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0918

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

矿渣−粉煤灰基地质聚合物固化淤泥质黏土的抗压强度试验研究

吴俊1,征西遥1,杨爱武2,李延波3   

  1. 1. 上海工程技术大学 城市轨道交通学院,上海 201620;2. 东华大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 201620; 3. 盐城工学院 材料科学与工程学院,江苏 盐城 221051
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-30 修回日期:2020-12-22 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨爱武,男,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事软黏土的结构性及其力学特性研究。E-mail:wayyjk@dhu.edu.cn E-mail:cvewujun@163.com
  • 作者简介:吴俊,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事软黏土加固及其力学性能研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978440,No.52078288)。

Experimental study on the compressive strength of muddy clay solidified by the one-part slag-fly ash based geopolymer

WU Jun1, ZHENG Xi-yao1, YANG Ai-wu2, LI Yan-bo3   

  1. 1. College of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China; 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 3. School of Material Science and Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu 221051, China)
  • Received:2020-06-30 Revised:2020-12-22 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51978440, 52078288).

摘要: 为解决水泥固化淤泥质黏土早期强度不足及制备水泥时高污染、高能耗及高成本等问题,采用“一步法”制备矿渣?粉煤灰基地质聚合物用以固化淤泥质黏土,研究硅铝原材料之比、固体激发剂与原材料比及水灰比对固化黏土抗压强度的影响规律,并采用电镜扫描和X射线能谱分析等试验方法进行微观分析,揭示其固化机制。试验结果表明:当硅铝原材料为90%矿渣和10%粉煤灰,碱性激发剂占硅铝原材料质量比为0.15,水灰比为0.7时,其14 d的无侧限抗压强度达到1.5 MPa。矿渣?粉煤灰基地质聚合物主要产物有无定型的水化硅酸钙、水化铝酸钙凝胶,是固化黏土抗压强度提升的主要原因。研究结果为地质聚合物在淤泥质黏土加固中应用奠定一定的理论基础。

关键词: 地质聚合物, 矿渣, 粉煤灰, 无侧限抗压强度, 微观分析

Abstract: To solve the issues of insufficient early strength of cement solidified muddy clay and high pollution, high energy consumption and high cost induced by the application of cement binder, the one-part slag-fly ash (SL-FA) based geopolymer was adopted as the binder to solidify the muddy clay. The effects of the ratio of slag to fly ash in silicon-aluminum (Si-Al) raw materials, the ratio of solid activator to Si-Al raw material and the ratio of water to binder on the mechanical properties of geopolymer solidified muddy clay were studied through the unconfined compression test. The micro-analysis (i.e., scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer) was also conducted to investigate the development of the microstructure of the muddy clay solidified by the one-part SL-FA based geopolymer. The experimental results showed that when the Si-Al raw material was composed of 90% slag and 10% fly ash by mass, the mass ratio of alkali activator to Si-Al raw material was 0.15, and the mass ratio of water to binder was 0.7, the 14-day compressive strength of the geopolymer solidified muddy clay could reach 1.5 MPa. It was also found that the main hydration products of the slag-fly ash based geopolymer were amorphous hydrated calcium silicate hydrates and hydrated calcium aluminate hydrates, which is the main reason for the improvement of the compressive strength of solidified clay. The micro-structure of geopolymer solidified muddy clay was connected by hydrated calcium silicate hydrates and calcium aluminate hydrates. The results provide a certain theoretical basis for the practical application of one-part slag-fly ash based geopolymer as the soil binder in the improvement of muddy clay.

Key words: geopolymer, slag, fly ash, unconfined compressive strength, micro-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[2] 黄涛, 方祥位, 张伟, 申春妮, 雷宇龙, . 活性氧化镁−微生物固化黄土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3300-3306.
[3] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[4] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[5] 王东星, 肖杰, 李丽华, 肖衡林, . 基于碳化-固化技术的武汉东湖淤泥 耐久性演变微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3045-3053.
[6] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[7] 王东星, 肖 杰, 肖衡林, 马 强, . 武汉东湖淤泥碳化-固化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1805-1812.
[8] 查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.
[9] 王东星, 王宏伟, 邹维列, 徐学勇, . 活性MgO−粉煤灰固化淤泥耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4675-4684.
[10] 吕擎峰, 周 刚, 王生新, 霍振升, 马 博, . 固化盐渍土核磁共振微观特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 245-249.
[11] 陈瑞锋,田高源,米栋云,董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[12] 张亭亭,王 平,李江山,万 勇,薛 强,王士权, . 养护龄期和铅含量对磷酸镁水泥固化/稳定化铅污染土的固稳性能影响规律及微观机制[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2115-2123.
[13] 章定文,项 莲,曹智国, . CaO对钙矾石固化/稳定化重金属铅污染土的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 29-35.
[14] 刘晋铭,欧忠文,肖寒冰,莫金川,杨康辉. 功能组分对固化土早期强度的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 755-761.
[15] 邓友生,吴 鹏,赵明华,段邦政,. 基于最优含水率的聚丙烯纤维增强膨胀土强度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 349-353.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[2] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[3] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[4] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[5] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[6] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[7] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[8] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .
[9] 王国粹,杨 敏. 砂土中水平受荷桩非线性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 261 -267 .
[10] 袁敬强 ,陈卫忠 ,谭贤君 ,王 辉. 软弱地层注浆的细观力学模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 653 -659 .