岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2741-2754.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0244

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于核磁共振的季冻区膨胀土三峰孔隙结构演化特征及其力学效应

李甜果1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,王俊涛1, 2,王凤华1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-08 修回日期:2021-08-23 出版日期:2021-10-11 发布日期:2021-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术方面的研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:litianguo16@mails.ucas.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李甜果,女,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事膨胀土工程特性与微观结构方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2019YFC1509901)。

Trimodal pore structure evolution characteristics and mechanical effects of expansive soil in seasonally frozen areas based on NMR test

LI Tian-guo1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, WANG Jun-tao1, 2, WANG Feng-hua1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2021-02-08 Revised:2021-08-23 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1509901).

摘要: 为探讨季冻区膨胀土的孔隙结构演化特征及其孔隙结构与宏观力学特性之间的联系,对佳木斯原状膨胀土开展了核磁共振(NMR)试验,并辅以扫描电镜(SEM)试验,来分析土样的孔隙结构。同时,对膨胀土在不同固结压力和冻融循环作用下的孔隙结构演化规律进行了研究,并探究了孔隙结构演化与力学特性之间的联系。试验结果表明:(1)佳木斯膨胀土内部存在发育的裂隙,使得其T2时间分布曲线呈现三峰特征;在固结压力的作用下,原状样的孔隙分布特征根据固结压力小于、略大于和远远大于前期固结压力表现明显不同,随着固结压力的增加,孔隙结构的调整速率减小;在冻融循环作用下,膨胀土的孔隙比减小,微孔基本保持不变,但中孔比例增加,大孔比例减小。(2)冻融循环作用使应力?应变曲线由应变软化型转变为应变稳定型,破坏模式由脆性破坏模式转变为塑性破坏;无侧限抗压强度随着冻融循环次数的增加呈指数型函数减小;冻融循环作用使膨胀土的收缩性显著增强。(3)孔隙结构的变化与力学特性具有较好的线性关系,冻融循环作用对土体孔隙结构的影响,与土体的宏观行为表现具有较好的一致性,可供建立膨胀土孔隙结构与工程性能定量关系参考。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 核磁共振, 无侧限抗压强度, 冻融循环, 胀缩性

Abstract: To investigate the evolution of the pore structure and the relationship between the pore structure and the macroscopic mechanical properties of the expansive soil in the seasonally frozen area, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests were carried out on the Jiamusi undisturbed expansive soil. Besides, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) test was also adopted to distinguish the pore structure of the soil. Meanwhile, the influence of the consolidation pressures and the freeze-thaw cycles on the pore structure of the expansive soil were studied, and the relationships between the evolution of the pore structure and mechanical properties of the expansive soil were further explored. The results show that: i) Cracks developed in the Jiamusi expansive soil induce a trimodal characteristic of the T2 time distribution curve. The distribution of the pore size of the undisturbed sample behaves significantly differently with the varied consolidation pressure, including the three stages of the pressure is less than, slightly greater than and much greater than the pre-consolidation pressure. As the consolidation pressure is increased, the adjustment rate of the pore structure decreases. The void ratio of the soil decreases with the increased freeze-thaw cycles. The increased freeze-thaw cycles will lead to the increased proportion of mesopore and the decreased proportion of the macropore, while the micropores are not sensitive to the variation of the freeze thaw cycles. ii) The stress-strain curves vary from strain-softening to strain-stable with the increased freeze-thaw cycles and the failure modes of the expansive soil change from brittle failure mode to plastic failure mode. The unconfined compressive strength decreases exponentially with the increased freeze-thaw cycles. The shrinkage characteristic of the expansive soil is enhanced significantly under the freeze-thaw cycles. iii) The variation of the pore structure exhibit the linear trend with the mechanical characteristic. The effects of freeze-thaw cycles on the pore structure of the expansive sole are consistent with that on the macroscopic behaviors. The results obtained in this study can be used to establish a quantitative relationship between pore structure and engineering performance of the expansive soil.

Key words: pore structure, NMR, unconfined compressive strength, freeze-thaw cycle, expansibility

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 乔趁, 王宇, 宋正阳, 李长洪, 侯志强, . 饱水裂隙花岗岩周期冻胀力演化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2141-2150.
[2] 孔令明, 梁珂, 彭丽云. 比表面积对土冻结特征曲线影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1883-1893.
[3] 杨爱武, 徐彩丽, 郎瑞卿, 王韬, . 冻融循环作用下城市污泥固化土三维力学 特性及其破坏准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 963-975.
[4] 吴俊, 征西遥, 杨爱武, 李延波. 矿渣−粉煤灰基地质聚合物固化淤泥质黏土的抗压强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 647-655.
[5] 金爱兵, 巨有, 孙浩, 赵怡晴, 李海, 张舟, 陆通, . 相变储能充填体孔隙结构及强度劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2623-2633.
[6] 张 泽, 马 巍, ROMAN Lidia, MELNIKOV Andrey, 杨 希, 李宏璧. 基于冻融次数−物理时间比拟理论的冻土 长期强度预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 86-92.
[7] 房营光, 陈建, 谷任国, 巴凌真, 舒浩恺, . 基于有效比表面积修正的Kozeny-Carman方程 在黏土渗透中的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2547-2554.
[8] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[9] 杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征 核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[10] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[11] 孟祥传, 周家作, 韦昌富, 张坤, 沈正艳, 杨周洁, . 盐分对土的冻结温度及未冻水含量的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 952-960.
[12] 高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[13] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[14] 彭家奕, 张家发, 沈振中, 叶加兵, . 颗粒形状对粗粒土孔隙特征和渗透性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 592-600.
[15] 马东东, 陈庆, 周辉, 滕起, 李科, 胡大伟, . 砂砾岩液态CO2破裂机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3996-4004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627 -3634 .
[4] 刘小丽,张丹丹,刘 凯,苏媛媛. 一种直剪式模型试验设备的设计及应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 475 -480 .
[5] 康永君,杨 军,宋二祥. 地震作用下边坡安全系数时程计算及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 261 -268 .
[6] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[7] 李荣建,于玉贞,吕 禾,李广信. 饱和砂土地基上抗滑桩加固边坡的动力离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 897 -902 .
[8] 肖成志,孙建诚,李雨润,刘晓朋. 三维土工网垫植草护坡防坡面径流冲刷的机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 453 -458 .
[9] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691 -0696 .
[10] 钱建固 ,黄茂松. 土体塑性各向异性的微宏观机理分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 88 -93 .