黄土的构度指标及其试验确定方法

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 15-19.

黄土的构度指标及其试验确定方法

邵生俊¹, ²，郑文¹，王正泓¹，王帅¹

1. 西安理工大学岩土工程研究所，西安 710048；2. 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室，西安 710048

收稿日期:2009-09-21 出版日期:2010-01-10 发布日期:2010-02-02
作者简介:邵生俊，男，1964年生，教授，博导，从事土动力学与黄土力学研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 50779054，No. 10872161）；陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室基金项目（No. 220533）。

Structural index of loess and its testing method

SHAO Sheng-jun¹, ²，ZHENG Wen¹，WANG Zheng-hong¹，WANG Shuai¹

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an 710048, China

Received:2009-09-21 Online:2010-01-10 Published:2010-02-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

黄土的结构性是一个重要的物理性质指标，它与土的粒度、密度和湿度一起影响土的力学性质。依据加荷、扰动、浸水释放土结构势的方法，由土的无侧限抗压强度定义了黄土结构性的构度指标。通过多个场地不同黄土的无侧限单轴压缩试验，测试分析了不同含水率原状土、重塑土和饱和原状土的单轴压缩应力-应变曲线及无侧限抗压强度变化规律，由此得出土的构度指标的变化规律。并且，在粒度、密度、湿度相似条件下，比较分析了土的构度指标与其压缩性之间的关系。土的构度指标与粒度、密度和湿度指标一起能够合理描述土的物理力学基本性质。

关键词: 黄土, 结构性, 构度, 无侧限抗压强度

Abstract:

Loess structure is an important physical property, which influences mechanical properties of loess with its particle size, density and humidity. Based on the structure potential of loess released by loading, remolding and saturating, the unconfined compressive strength of intact, remolded and saturated loess were measured by uniaxial compression test; and the structural index of loess was defined by comparing the stability and changeability of loess structure which determined respectively by the ratio of confined compression strength of loess and remolding soil and the ratio of confined compressive strength of saturating loess and loess. Through the unconfined uniaxial compression test of four kinds of loess adopted from different sites, the unconfined uniaxial compression stress-strain curves of intact, remolded and saturated loesses with different water contents were tested to reflect the uniaxial compression stress-strain property, as well as the law of unconfined compressive strength and loess structural index changing with the water content was analyzed for different kinds of loesses. When the particle size, density and humidity of loess being similar, the greater the structure index of loess, the smaller the compressibility and the greater the shear strength of loess. So the structure Index structure together with the particle size, density and humidity can be used to describe reasonably the fundamental physico-mechanical properties of intact soils.

Key words: loess, structure, structure index, uniaxial compressive strength

中图分类号:

TU 444

邵生俊，郑文，王正泓，王帅. 黄土的构度指标及其试验确定方法[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 15-19.

SHAO Sheng-jun，ZHENG Wen，WANG Zheng-hong，WANG Shuai. Structural index of loess and its testing method[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 15-19.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[4]	刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[5]	高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[6]	朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[7]	沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[8]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[9]	邵生俊, 陈菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[10]	王铁行, 金鑫, 罗扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
[11]	王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[12]	谌文武, 刘伟, 王娟, 孙冠平, 吴玮江, . 黄土饱和度与B值关系试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 834-842.
[13]	张玉伟, 翁效林, 宋战平, 谢永利, . 考虑黄土结构性和各向异性的修正剑桥模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1030-1038.
[14]	王丽琴, 邵生俊, 王帅, 赵聪, 石鹏鑫, 周彪, . 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1076-1084.
[15]	查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed