基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3619-3626.

基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析

刘杰¹，李建林¹，屈建军²，陈星¹，李剑武¹，骆世威¹

1. 三峡大学三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室，湖北宜昌 443002；2. 宜昌市建设工程质量（安全）监督站，湖北宜昌 443000

收稿日期:2009-09-11 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
作者简介:刘杰，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土工程和水工结构方面的教学和研究工作。
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划（No. 2008BAB29B03）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 51009083）；湖北省教育厅自然科学研究项目(No. Q20101201)；三峡大学科基金资助项目(No. KJ2009B061，No. KJ2009A033，No. 00956)。

Multiple factors analysis of influence of developing horizontal displacement at Dagangshan dam abutment slope based on unloading rock mass mechanics

LIU Jie¹，LI Jian-lin¹，QU Jian-jun²，Cheng Xing¹，LI Jian-wu1，LUO Shi-wei¹

1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2.Yichang Construction Quality (Safety) Supervision Station, Yichang, Hubei 443000, China

Received:2009-09-11 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在现阶段工程运用中，卸荷岩体力学理论中还需完善和扩充的几个方面为①锚索施加前后卸荷效应对边坡水平位移的影响；②超前开挖锚固滞后的方案会对具体工程岩体水平位移产生的影响；③关键工程结构面连通率对卸荷岩体位移的影响；④地震作用下卸荷岩体的水平位移响应；⑤地震作用下不同连通率对水平向位移的影响。针对此，以大岗山坝肩边坡为对象展开研究。分析指出岩体开挖卸荷后回弹变形和压缩变形都会大于未考虑岩质劣化时的计算变形。同时指出，卸荷条件下两种施工方案对坡面的水平向位移造成的影响较小，为超挖多级而锚固措施相对滞后的现场施工过程的可行性提供依据。统计出各剖面在不同高程水平位移随地震加速度发展特征，建议水平位移随地震加速度呈非线性变化区域为防震抗震重点加固区域。研究发现，连通率的增大会导致卸荷裂隙XL9-15，XL316-1的塑性区发育明显增大，而裂隙范围内塑性区的加剧不会明显地反映在坡面关键点的变化上，开挖工况可能造成表观位移较小的突发性崩塌。

关键词: 卸荷岩体力学理论, 超前开挖, 坝肩边坡, 连通率, 地震加速度, 塑性区

Abstract:

At present, in engineering application, there are something to improve and extended in unloading rock mass mechanics theory. First, unloading has effect on horizontal displacement of slope before and after anchor is applied; second, overbreak and anchor lag have effect on horizontal displacement of rock in the concrete engineering. Third, the connectivity rate of structural plane has effect on displacement of unloading rock; fourth, unloading rock has horizontal displacement response under earthquake action. Fifth, different connectivity rates have effect on horizontal displacement under earthquake action. So, based on unloading rock mass the theory, it carries out the research of Dagangshan dam abutment slope developing horizontal displacement. Adopting construction. It carries out the research of Dagangshan dam abutment slope. Pointed out that rebound deformation and compression deformation after the rock excavation unloading will be greater than does not take into account when calculating the deformation of the rock deterioration. Statistics of profiles of the horizontal displacement the characteristics with the development of the earthquake acceleration at different elevations, the proposed horizontal displacement with changes in earthquake acceleration was nonlinear region the focus of aseismic and reinforcement for the earthquake region it is. Indicated that the two types of program under unloading condition engender the smaller impact to the slope horizontal displacement, multi-stage overbreak, anchoring measures is lagging behind the scene of the feasibility of the construction process to provide a basis. The research shows that increase of connectivity rate will cause that plastic zone of unloading fissure XL9-15,XL316-1 increase obviously, but within fissures extension the increase of plastic zone is obviously not the key point reflected in the changes in slope, and the excavation work could cause the apparent smaller displacement of the status of the sudden collapse.

中图分类号:

TU 452

刘杰，李建林，屈建军，陈星，李剑武，骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619-3626.

LIU Jie，LI Jian-lin，QU Jian-jun，Cheng Xing，LI Jian-wu，LUO Shi-wei. Multiple factors analysis of influence of developing horizontal displacement at Dagangshan dam abutment slope based on unloading rock mass mechanics[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619-3626.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[2]	吴红刚, 武志信, 谢显龙, 牌立芳, . 土质边坡微型桩组合结构大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3844-3854.
[3]	尹小涛，严飞，秦雨樵，周磊，王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[4]	王凤云，钱德玲. 基于切向应变软化的深埋圆形隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3313-3320.
[5]	肖国峰，陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[6]	王刚，徐浩，武猛猛，王锐，宋相，周晓华,. 基于不同弹性本构方程的塑性区宽度及封孔长度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2599-2608.
[7]	程建龙，杨圣奇，潘玉丛，田文岭，赵维生,. 挤压地层双护盾TBM围岩变形及应力场特征研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 371-380.
[8]	袁维，郝笑甜，李小春，白冰，王伟，陈祥军，籍晓蕾,. 一种考虑变形参数和强度参数协调折减的强度折减法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2096-2100.
[9]	黎春林，缪林昌，. 盾构隧道施工土体扰动范围研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 759-766.
[10]	张常光，范文，赵均海,. 深埋圆形巷道围岩塑性区位移及特征曲线新解和参数分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 12-24.
[11]	周喻，张怀静，吴顺川，高永涛，孙浩，叶强，李健，. 节理连通率对岩体力学特性影响的细观研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 29-36.
[12]	高峰，孙常新，谭绪凯，朱艺，李虎,. 不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2517-2522.
[13]	周元辅，邓建辉，崔玉龙，郑洪春，陈滔 , . 基于强度折减法的三维边坡失稳判据[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1430-1437.
[14]	张淼，邹金锋，陈嘉祺，李亮，李振存 . 非对称荷载作用下土体劈裂注浆压力分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2255-2263.
[15]	刘时鹏，施建勇，雷国辉，林海 . K0固结饱和土柱孔扩张问题弹塑性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 389-394.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed