›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S2): 198-205.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

EPS颗粒轻质混合土的蠕变模型研究

高洪梅1, 2,刘汉龙1, 2,刘金元3,沈 扬1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,南京 210098;2. 河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,南京 210098) (3. Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-21 出版日期:2010-12-10 发布日期:2011-01-12
  • 作者简介:高洪梅,女,1982年生,博士研究生,主要从事软基处理及道路工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省自然科学基金攀登学者创新项目(No. BK2008040)。

Research on creep model of EPS composite soil

GAO Hong-mei 1,2, LIU Han-long 1,2, LIU Jin-yuan3, SHEN Yang 1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
  • Received:2010-04-21 Online:2010-12-10 Published:2011-01-12

摘要:

EPS颗粒轻质混合土是一种新型轻质填土材料,相比EPS泡沫块体,具有更广泛的应用前景。EPS颗粒轻质混合土的基本物理及力学性质已得到了较多的研究,但其蠕变特性研究较少。通过不同围压下EPS颗粒轻质混合土的三轴不排水蠕变试验,采用三种常用的经验模型:Singh & Mitchell模型、Mesri模型和Findley模型对EPS颗粒轻质混合土的蠕变变形进行模拟,结果表明:Singh & Mithcell模型和Mesri模型能反映蠕变趋势,但是不能拟合应变初始快速上升段,用来描述EPS泡沫块体的Findley模型在应力水平较高时,拟合效果最好,某种程度上说,EPS颗粒轻质混合土的蠕变性与EPS泡沫块体相似。推导出了一种新的半经验半理论蠕变模型,用元件模型描述弹性变形部分,用经验模型描述塑性变形部分,拟合结果表明,不管应力水平的高低,新推蠕变模型都不仅能够很好地反映EPS颗粒轻质混合土的初始快速上升段变形,也能够比较准确地拟合长期变形,即蠕变性。

关键词: EPS颗粒轻质混合土, 蠕变模型, 三轴不排水试验, 经验模型, 元件模型, EPS泡沫块体

Abstract:

Expanded polystyrene(EPS) composite soil is a new kind of lightweight fill material. Compared with well-known EPS geofoam, EPS composite soil will be widely used in the future. The fundamental physico-mechanical properties of EPS composite soil have been studied by many researchers. However, the creep properties of EPS composite soil have not been published in the literatures according to our best knowledge. Firstly, the triaxial undrained creep tests were conducted on EPS composite soil with various confining pressures. Secondly, three well-known empirical creep models were used to simulate the creep behavior of EPS composite soil including Singh & Mitchell model, Mesri model, and Findley model. Singh & Mithcell model and Mesri model were able to predict the long-term deformation of EPS composite soil, however, they could not describe the initial sharp rising deformation. It was observed that Findley model which was firstly used to predict the creep behavior of EPS geofoam had the best fitting results under higher deviator stress level. To some extent, the creep property of EPS composite soil was similar to that of EPS geofoam. Finally, a new creep model was proposed for EPS composite soil, in which the element models were used to describe the elastic strain and empirical models to describe the plastic strain. It was shown that whatever the stress levels were, the proposed new creep model could not only describe the initial sharp rising deformation but also predict the long-term deformation, i.e. creep deformation.

Key words: EPS composite soil, creep model, triaxial undrained test, empirical model, element model, EPS geofoam

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43
[1] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[2] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[3] 朱赛楠, 殷跃平, 李 滨, . 二叠系炭质页岩软弱夹层剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1377-1386.
[4] 唐建新,腾俊洋,张 闯,刘 姝, . 层状含水页岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 33-41.
[5] 张 玉,王亚玲,俞 缙,张晓东,栾雅琳,. 深层膏质泥岩蠕变特性及非线性蠕变模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 105-112.
[6] 杨 超,黄 达,蔡 睿,黄润秋,. 张开穿透型单裂隙岩体三轴卸荷蠕变特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 53-62.
[7] 杨爱武,于军东,齐杰杰,. 吹填软土CU三轴剪切应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3089-3094.
[8] 房营光,彭占淇,谷任国,胡玉光,欧振峰,李 波, . 流变物质对软土流变参数影响的蠕变试验[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 257-262.
[9] 吴 越,杨仲轩,徐长节,. 初始组构各向异性对砂土力学特性及临界状态的影响[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2569-2576.
[10] 牛双建 ,党元恒 ,冯文林 ,杨大方,. 损伤破裂砂岩单轴蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1249-1258.
[11] 何志磊 ,朱珍德 ,朱明礼 ,李志敬,. 基于分数阶导数的非定常蠕变本构模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 737-744.
[12] 赵 娜,周 密,何晓民. 掺砾黏土样的大型三轴流变特性试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 423-429.
[13] 蔡燕燕 ,张建智 ,俞 缙 ,陈士海,. 考虑围岩蠕变全过程与扩容的深埋隧洞非线性位移解[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1831-1839.
[14] 王鹏程,骆亚生,胡连信,王书静. 重塑黄土三轴蠕变特性研究及模型分析[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1627-1632.
[15] 刘映晶 ,李 罡 ,尹振宇 ,夏小和 ,王建华,. 颗粒级配对粒状材料不排水力学特性的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 423-429.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[3] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[4] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[5] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[6] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[7] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[8] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[9] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .
[10] 王松鹤,齐吉琳. 高温冻土松弛特性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1660 -1666 .