›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 53-62.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.2821

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

张开穿透型单裂隙岩体三轴卸荷蠕变特性试验

杨 超1,黄 达2,蔡 睿1,黄润秋3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 河北工业大学 土木与交通学院,天津 300401; 3. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-12 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 黄达,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程和工程地质方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: dahuang@cqu.edu.cn E-mail: vanni1010@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:杨超,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土及隧道工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41602301,No. 51679128,No. 41502291)。

Triaxial unloading creep tests on rock mass with an open and penetrating flaw

YANG Chao1, HUANG Da2, CAI Rui1, HUANG Run-qiu3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geo-environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2015-12-12 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602301, 51679128, 41502291).

摘要: 高应力条件下较多岩体工程在开挖卸荷过程中表现出显著的时效变形特征。为研究裂隙岩体在卸荷状态下的蠕变特征,以锦屏I级水电站大理岩为原样制备模型试样,开展了恒轴压分级卸围压三轴卸荷蠕变试验。试验结果表明:试件在破坏时对应应力差最小的是倾角为30°裂隙试样,其次为倾角为60°裂隙试样,倾角为90°裂隙试样最大。从破坏形式来看,完整试件与倾角为90°裂隙试件均呈整体剪切破坏模式,倾角为30°和60°裂隙试件均从裂纹尖端扩展至破坏。变形特征方面,均可采用Burgers模型对各裂隙试样不含加速蠕变阶段的蠕变曲线进行拟合,试样在不同裂隙类型和应力水平下的变形特点则通过参数数值加以区分。该结论与Lemaitre应变等效原理和Sidoroff能量等价原理中有关损伤材料和无损材料间相关关系的基本观点一致。基于此,提出了裂隙岩体损伤蠕变模型,该模型建立了完整岩石与裂隙岩体间的相关关系,对裂隙岩体时效变形特征的进一步研究具有较好的参考价值。

关键词: 岩石力学, 裂隙岩体, 三轴卸荷蠕变试验, 损伤蠕变模型

Abstract: Time-dependent deformation of rock mass is obviously found under high stress condition during excavation unloading process. To investigate the unloading creep characteristics of fractured rock, specimens were prepared by marbles from Jinping I hydropower station. Then unloading creep experiments were performed in the laboratory under constant axial pressure and stepwise unloading lateral stress. The results showed that when the specimens fail, the corresponding smallest stress difference is found on the specimen with the angle of 30°, the middle one is specimen with the angle of 60 °, and the largest one is the specimen with the angle of 90°. Overall, shear failure occurs in the intact specimen and the specimen with the angle of 90°, while the cracks initiate from internal tips of pre-existing flaw of specimens with angles of 30° and 60°. The Burgers model is also employed to describe deformation characteristics of all intact rock and fractured rock without the accelerated creep stage. The values of parameters are used to distinguish the deformation characteristics of specimens with different fissures and under different stress conditions. The obtained results are consistent with the views of Lemaitre equivalent strain and Sidoroff energy equivalent principle on the correlations between damaged materials and undamaged materials. According to above results, damage creep constitutive models are put forward for the fractured rock mass. Moreover, the relationship between the intact rock and fractured rock masses is established using the proposed models. Therefore, this study can provide references for further study on time-dependent deformation characteristics of fractured rock mass.

Key words: rock mechanics, fractured rock, unloading triaxial creep tests, damage creep model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[4] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[5] 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[6] 支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[7] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
[8] 张艳博, 梁鹏, 孙林, 田宝柱, 姚旭龙, 刘祥鑫, . 单轴压缩下饱水花岗岩破裂过程声发射 频谱特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2497-2506.
[9] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[10] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[11] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[12] 苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[13] 王 宇, 艾 芊, 李建林, 邓华锋, . 考虑不同影响因素的砂岩损伤特征 及其卸荷破坏细观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1341-1350.
[14] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[15] 朱赛楠, 殷跃平, 李 滨, . 二叠系炭质页岩软弱夹层剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1377-1386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!