›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1153-1160.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.030

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Upper bound limit analysis based on Taylor expansion form of element velocity

SUN Cong1, 2,LI Chun-guang1,ZHENG Hong1,SUN Guan-hua1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Wuhan Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China
  • Received:2014-07-21 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11172313) and 973 Program (2011CB013505).

Abstract: The upper bound limit analysis method has a more rigorous theoretical basis and clearer physics meaning compared to the limit equilibrium method. Based on the series expansion, the velocity field of a triangle element is expanded through center point velocity and its velocity gradients. Hence the upper bound FEM method based on the center point velocity and its velocity gradients are introduced as unknowns. The method not only enriches the upper bound limit analysis method, but also has a simpler flow equation. The proposed method can be considered as the multidimensional extension of rigid FE upper bound limit method, and has a more rigorous theoretical basis than rigid FE upper bound limit method. The requirement that all the point must strictly meet the limit properties is relaxed and the equal-area polygon is adopted to approximate the yield circle. Two case studies show that this method can steadily converge into the true solution, and has the same convergence as the traditional method by Sloan; when equal-area polygon is taken, the method yields a good result by less number of polygon edges, with significantly improved convergence.

Key words: upper bound limit analysis method, Taylor expansion, rigid finite elements upper bound limit analysis, equal-area polygon

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452

[1] GUO Liang, HU Xie-wen, LI Xiao-zhao, WU Xi-yong, WU Li-zhou, LI Yu, LUO Gang, MA Hong-sheng,. Experimental study of hydraulic characteristics of undisturbed fractured rock in granite fault zone [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3937-3948.
[2] ZHANG Xi-wei, WANG Gang, CAI Ming, XU Quan,. Deformation behaviour and brittleness of Linghai granite [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3515-3524.
[3] CHEN Song, QIAO Chun-sheng, YE Qing, DENG Bin. Composite damage constitutive model of rock mass with intermittent joints based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3612-3622.
[4] LI Shu-cai, PAN Dong-dong, XU Zhen-hao, LI Li-ping, LIN Peng,. A model test on catastrophic evolution process of water inrush of a concealed karst cave filled with confined water [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3164-3173.
[5] ZUO Yu-jun, SUN Wen-ji-bin, WU Zhong-hu, XU Yun-fei, . Experiment on permeability of shale under osmotic pressure and stress coupling [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3253-3260.
[6] WANG Feng-yun, QIAN De-ling. Elasto-plastic analysis of a deep circular tunnel based on tangential strain softening [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3313-3320.
[7] ZHENG An-xing, LUO Xian-qi,. An extended finite element method for modeling hydraulic fracturing in perilous rock [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3461-3468.
[8] FU Yan, YUAN Wen, LIU Xin-rong, MIAO Lou-li, XIE Wen-bo,. Deterioration rules of strength parameters of sandstone under cyclical wetting and drying in acid-based environment [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3331-3339.
[9] LIU Quan-sheng, PENG Xing-xin, HUANG Xing, LEI Guang-feng, WEI Lai, LIU He,. Monitoring shield stress of tunnel boring machine and jamming warning [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3406-3414.
[10] LI Xiao-fei, SUN Jiang-tao, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, LIU Jin-quan, ZHANG Qing-yan,. Strength and anti-washout property of fiber silica fume cement grout [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3157-3163.
[11] LI Dong-qi, LI Zong-li, Lü Cong-cong. Analysis of fracture strength of rock mass considering fissure additional water pressure [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3174-3180.
[12] WU Yong-sheng, TAN Zhong-sheng, YU Xian-bin, YU Yu, ZHU Yong,. Dilatancy behavior of phyllite in uniaxal compressive tests under different loading azimuths [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2747-2754.
[13] LI Yang, SHE Cheng-xue. Numerical simulation of effect of size on crushing strength of rockfill grains using particle flow code [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2951-2959.
[14] LI Shuai, ZHU Wan-cheng, NIU Lei-lei, LI Ru-fei, LI Shao-hua. Experimental study on influence of dynamic disturbance on deformation behavior of rock under stress relaxation [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2795-2804.
[15] WANG Fei-li, WANG Shu-hong, XIU Zhan-guo. Method on stress quantification and strength characterization of rock structural plane under the disturbance of stress wave [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2844-2850.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!