›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1533-1540.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.038

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles    

Development and application of large size direct shear test apparatus with visual and digital collection functions for reinforced soil

WANG Jia-quan1, ZHOU Yue-fu2, TANG Xian-yuan1, HUANG Shi-bin1   

  1. 1.College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China 2. Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
  • Received:2015-06-22 Online:2017-05-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China(51469005, 51009030) and the Natural Science Foundation in Guangxi Province of China (2015GXNSFAA139257, 2015GXNSFAA139270).

Abstract: A large size visual direct shear testing apparatus is developed to carry out direct shear tests of geosynthetics and soil under various conditions. The loading modes and reaction system of the apparatus are improved to explore the interface properties and loading transfer mechanism of reinforcement soil. The front visualization of the shear box and automated data acquisition system are achieved to measure the strain of geotextile material. Direct shear tests are conducted on geogrid and coarse-grained soil by using the newly developed apparatus. The results show that the interfacial cohesion of reinforced soil increases, but its internal friction angle decreases compared with plain soil. The geogrid strain increases with the increase of shear displacement. Moreover, the rapid increase of embedded resistance between the geogrid transverse rib and the soil is caused by the rapid increase of the geogrid strain. However, the maximum strain of the geogrid generated by direct shear is far less than the yield strain of the geogrid. The direct shear interface thickness of plain coarse soil is less than that of the reinforced soil. The movement of coarse grained soil particles is mainly translational on the reinforced soil around the direct shear interface, and meanwhile some small particles are in the horizontal rotational movement mode.

Key words: geogrid, direct shear test, interface interaction, strain

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411

[1] ZHANG Ke, LI Na, CHEN Yu-long, LIU Wen-lian, . Evolution characteristics of strain field and infrared radiation temperature field during deformation and rupture process of fractured sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] DUAN Jun-yi, YANG Guo-lin, HU Min, QIU Ming-ming, YU Yun, . Experimental study on deformation characteristics of reinforced soil cushion subjected to loading and unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[4] WANG Kang-yu, ZHUANG Yan, GENG Xue-yu, . Experimental study on critical dynamic stress of coarse-grained soil in railway subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[5] ZHU Nan, LIU Chun-yuan, ZHAO Xian-hui, WANG Wen-jing, . Micro-structure characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths in K0 consolidated drained tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[6] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HANG Tian-zhu, LIU Kang, HE Yang, . A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[7] LIU Xin-yu, ZHANG Xian-wei, YUE Hao-zhen, KONG Ling-wei, XU Chao, . SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[8] ZHANG Zhen, ZHANG Zhao, YE Guan-bao, WANG Meng, XIAO Yan, CHENG Yi, . Progressive failure mechanism of stiffened deep mixed column-supported embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[9] TAO Shuai, DONG Yi, WEI Chang-fu, . Small-strain stiffness test system of soil under controllable environmental humidity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[10] LI Jia-long, LI Gang, YU Long. Inelasticity-separated plane-strain element model and its application to Drucker-Prager model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[11] HOU Zhi-qiang, WANG Yu, LIU Dong-qiao, LI Chang-hong, LIU Hao. Experimental study of mechanical properties of marble under triaxial unloading confining pressure after fatigue loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[12] HAN Chao, PANG De-peng, LI De-jian. Analysis of energy evolution during the step loading and unloading creep experiments of sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[13] LI Min, MENG De-jiao, YAO Xin-yu, . Optimization of requirement for two kinds of ash solidified materials used in oil contaminated saline soil considering temperature sensitivity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[14] ZHOU En-quan, ZONG Zhi-xin, WANG Qiong, LU Jian-fei, ZUO Xi. Dynamic characteristics of pipe buried in rubber-silt lightweight mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[15] LANG Rui-qing, YANG Ai-wu, YAN Shu-wang, . Analysis of consolidation properties of rigid pile composite foundation based on modified equal strain assumption [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!