Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 104-116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0849

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation

HU Yao1, LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3, LEI Zheng1, LIU Ying-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience of China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2022-07-21 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE17-01) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0805402).

Abstract: Stacked tunnels is a complex system involving the interaction between tunnels and between tunnel and soil, and its safety will seriously affect the construction of urban rail transit. At present, the research on shaking table test of stacked tunnels focuses on horizontal parallel and cross arrangements, unidirectional and bidirectional ground motion input. This paper uses a self-designed three-dimensional laminar shear soil container to implement a shaking table model test on seismic response of vertical parallel stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation. Its seismic response includes the dynamic characteristics of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system, the acceleration of foundation soil and stacked tunnels, ground settlement, the pore pressure of foundation soil, and the dynamic soil pressure and the strain of stacked tunnels. The results show that with the increase of seismic wave peak ground acceleration (PGA), the natural frequency of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system decreases and the damping ratio increases. The gradient difference of soil acceleration and pore pressure around the stacked tunnels increases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the gradient difference around the upper tunnel is larger than that around the lower tunnel. The amplification effect of the foundation soil on the acceleration decreases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Under the action of same seismic wave, the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum of stacked tunnels at the same position is similar, but the amplitude increases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Furthermore, compared with the crown and bottom positions, the frequency range of the acceleration Fourier spectrum at the waist position becomes wider, and the peak amplitude decreases. The peak value of ground settlement decreases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the peak value of ground settlement in the center is obviously smaller than that on both sides of the foundation soil. The type of seismic wave has little effect on the peak value of dynamic earth pressure and strain of stacked tunnels. For the peak dynamic earth pressure, in the upper tunnel, the maximum value of the two tunnels is at the waist position, while the minimum value of upper and lower tunnels is at the bottom and crown positions, respectively. The peak strains at the both waist positions in the upper tunnel are significantly larger than those at the top and bottom positions, while the peak strain does not differ much at the four positions in lower tunnel.

Key words: shaking table test, stacked tunnels, seismic response, three-directional earthquake wave excitation

CLC Number: 

  • U451
[1] LIU Si-hong, LI Bo-wen, LU Yang, SHEN Chao-min, FANG Bin-xin, HANG Dan, . Shaking table tests on liquefaction resistance performance of soilbag-stacked cushion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 183-192.
[2] ZHENG Sen, LI Wei-hua, CUI Jie, LI Ya-dong, . Development and performance test of a stiffness-variable multidirectional laminar shear model container [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 616-625.
[3] ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li. Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024.
[4] AN Jun-hai, TAO Lian-jin, JIANG Lu-zhen, . A shaking table-based experimental study on seismic response of a shield- enlarge-dig type subway station structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[5] FENG Zhong-ju, MENG Ying-ying, ZHANG Cong, LAI De-jin, ZHU Ji-xin, LIN Lu-yu, . Dynamic response and p-y curve of pile groups in liquefaction site under strong earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1289-1298.
[6] GUO Ming-zhu, GU Kun-sheng, ZHANG He, SUN Hai-long, WANG Chen, LIU Huang, . Experimental study of dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1306-1316.
[7] ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, MENG Ying-ying, GUAN Yun-hui, CHEN Hui-yun, WANG Zhen, . Shaking table test on the difference of dynamic time-history response between single pile and pile group foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1326-1334.
[8] ZHOU Ze-hua, LÜ Yan, SU Sheng-rui, DIAO Yu-heng, WANG Zuo-peng, WANG Jian-kun, ZHAO Hui, . Seismic response and failure characteristics of granite slope using large-scale shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[9] CHEN Shi-jie, XIAO Ming, WANG Xiao-wei, CHEN Jun-tao, . Numerical analysis of seismic damage characteristics of an underground cavern intersected by a steeply dipped fault [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(9): 2600-2610.
[10] HE Jiang, XIAO Shi-guo, . Calculation method for seismic permanent displacement of assembled multi-step cantilever retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 1971-1982.
[11] LAI Tian-wen, LEI Hao, WU Zhi-xin, WU Hong-gang, . Shaking table test study on basalt fiber reinforced plastics in high slope protection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 390-400.
[12] FENG Zhong-ju, ZHANG Cong, HE Jing-bin, DONG Yun-xiu, YUAN Feng-bin, . Shaking table test of time-history response of rock-socketed single pile under strong earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3227-3237.
[13] ZHU Sai-nan, LI Wei-hua, LEE Vincent W, ZHAO Cheng-gang, . Analytical solution of seismic response of an undersea cavity under incident P1-wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 93-103.
[14] XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan. Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[15] LI Fu-xiu, WU Zhi-jian, YAN Wu-jian, ZHAO Duo-yin, . Research on dynamic response characteristics of loess tableland slopes based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .