›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 159-165.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.021

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental research on reinforcement-soil interface stiffness and damping ratio under cyclic shearing

LIU Fei-yu1, WANG Pan1, WANG Jun2, 3, 4, HU Xiu-qing2, 3, 4, CAI Yuan-qiang2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 2. College of Architecture and civil Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Engineering and Technology for Soft Soil Foundation and Tideland Reclamation of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, China; 4. Innovation Center of Tideland Reclamation and Ecological Protection, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, China
  • Received:2015-12-18 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Program of International Science and Technology cooperation (2015DFA71550), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478255, 51278383, 51478364) , the Science Foundation of Shanghai (14ZR1416100) and Key Innovation Team Project of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (2011R50020).

Abstract: In order to investigate the behavior of reinforcement-soil interface under dynamic load, a series of cyclic direct shear tests focused on geogrid,woven geotextile,non-woven geotextile with sand interface are performed through large-scale direct shear device. The shear stiffness and damping ratio of the interface in different conditions are gained; and then the relationship between cycle number and shear stiffness or damping ratio are analyzed. Results show that, in the same cycle number, the geogrid-sand interface has the largest value of shear stiffness; and the woven getextile-sand interface has the largest value of damping ratio. The interface exhibit cyclic shear hardening in the three values of normal stress with the cyclic shear amplitude of 3 mm. The damping ratio of the interface in different normal stresses tends to a same stable value with the increase of cycle number. The interface shear stiffness is increased and damping ratio is decreased with sand relative density, and with the increase of cycle number the damping ratio of the interface in different sand relative densities tends to a same stable value. Cyclic shear degradation is observed in the interface suffering cyclic direct shear with shear amplitude of 5 mm; the interface with a larger shear amplitude in cyclic direct shear has larger value of stiffness.

Key words: reinforced soil, reinforcement-soil interface, cyclic shearing, shear stiffness, damping ratio

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443

[1] XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan. Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] JIANG Chang-bao, WEI Cai, DUAN Min-ke, CHEN Yu-fei, YU Tang, LI Zheng-ke, . Hysteresis effect and damping characteristics of shale under saturated and natural state [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[4] SUN Jing, GONG Mao-sheng, XIONG Hong-qiang, GAN Lin-rui, . Experimental study of the effect of freeze-thaw cycles on dynamic characteristics of silty sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[5] LIANG Ke, HE Yang, CHEN Guo-xing, . Experimental study of dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of coral sand from Nansha Islands [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[6] RUI Sheng-jie, GUO Zhen, WANG Li-zhong, ZHOU Wen-jie, LI Yu-jie, . Experimental study of cyclic shear stiffness and damping ratio of carbonate sand-steel interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 78-86.
[7] KE Wen-hai, GUAN Ling-xiao, LIU Dong-hai, DENG Jian-lin, LI Ke, XU Chang-jie, . Research on upper pipeline-soil interaction induced by shield tunnelling [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 221-228.
[8] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[9] XU Jiang, QU Jia-mei, LIU Yi-xin, PENG Shou-jian, WANG Wei, WU Shan-kang, . Influence of filling material on the behavior of joints under cyclic shear loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[10] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, LEI Tao, LIU Qi, WANG Zhi-meng, LIU Yong, . Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[11] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HE Yang, LIU Jing-ru, . An new method for calculation of dynamic modulus and damping ratio based on theory of correlation function [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1368-1376.
[12] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[13] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, CHEN Jun, LU Jing-jing, CUI Guo-jian, YANG Pin-qing, . Experimental study of shear deformation characteristics of marble dentate joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[14] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, GAO Ze-fei, WANG Zhi-meng, . Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[15] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!