Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2407-2415.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0386

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A dynamic response of blasting to stereoscopic goaf group based on the multi-degree of freedom model method

JIANG Li-Chun1, 2, LUO En-Min2, SHEN Bin-Bin2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China
  • Received:2018-05-10 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC0600802) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574013).

Abstract: In this study, a multi-degree of freedom model method was proposed to construct the differential equation for similar dynamic responses of complex stereoscopic goaf of metal ore under blasting load excitation. The correction factor matrix λ of the shear effect and the action coefficient matrix B were also introduced to describe the shearing effect of surrounding rock under external loads. The Newmark-β method was applied to solve the differential equation for similar dynamic responses in the goaf. The self-contained Matlab program was used to realize the fast calculation, which solved the problems of low efficiency and poor accuracy of the dynamic responses of the multi-degree of freedom goafs. An example of the 3×3 unit goaf in a metal mine was compared with the numerical simulation method. The results show that this method can directly reflect the dynamic response laws of the particles in the stereoscopic goaf group, and the displacement and velocity curves are basically consistent with the numerical simulation results. The maximum displacement is the area with the application of the blasting load. The comparison between the calculation results of the multi-degree of freedom model method and the field displacement monitoring results reveals that their displacement changes are similar, their peak values are at the same order of magnitude, and the latter displacement is slightly delayed. This research provides a new way to study the dynamic responses of the complex stereoscopic goaf group.

Key words: multi-degree of freedom model method, dynamic response, stereoscopic goaf group, blasting load, Newmark-β method

CLC Number: 

  • TD32
[1] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[5] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[6] LU Wei, ZHAO Dong, LI Dong-bo, MAO Xiao-fei. Analytical method for dynamic response of fully grouted anchorage system of rammed earth sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[7] ZHOU Zi-han, CHEN Zhong-hui, WANG Jian-ming, ZHANG Ling-fan, NIAN Geng-qian. Catastrophe analysis of open-pit slope stability under blasting load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[8] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[9] WU Qi, DING Xuan-ming, CHEN Zhi-xiong, CHEN Yu-min, PENG Yu, . Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[10] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] YU Yi-fan, WANG Ping, WANG Hui-juan, XU Shu-ya, GUO Hai-tao, . Physical model test of seismic dynamic response to accumulative landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[12] JIANG An-nan, ZHANG Quan, WU Hong-tao, DUAN Long-mei, JIAO Ming-wei, BAI Tao, . Stability analysis of slope affected by blasting based on improved local safety method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[13] YANG Wen-bo, ZOU Tao, TU Jiu-lin, GU Xiao-xu, LIU Yu-chen, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan. Analysis of dynamic response of horseshoe cross-section tunnel under vibrating load induced by high-speed train [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[14] LU Jun-long, ZHANG Yin, . Experimental study of the seismic response of the assembled multi-ribbed wall structure-subsoil system in frequency domain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2163-2171.
[15] SHI Li, WANG Hui-ping, SUN Hong-lei, PAN Xiao-dong, . Approximate analytical solution on vibrations of saturated ground induced by pile foundations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1750-1760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!