Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2149-2156.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1829

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Model tests on geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment under static and dynamic loads

DENG You-sheng, LI Ling-tao, PENG Cheng-pu, LI Long, LIU Jun-cong, FU Yun-bo   

  1. Plie-supported Structures Research & Test Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2021-10-31 Revised:2022-03-03 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878554,41672308) and the Key Projects of Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Plan (2018JZ5012).

Abstract: The pile-soil stress and grid tensile force of each part of the geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment were detected through laboratory model tests under both dynamic and static loads, and the development and evolution mechanism of soil arching effect and the development characteristics of geogrid stretching effect were studied. The test results show that the distributions of pile-soil stress and grid tension are greater in the transverse direction of the subgrade than that in longitudinal extension direction, which is related to the design of the trapezoidal section of the subgrade; the spatial soil arching effect is stronger than the planar soil arching effect, and the limit state of the spatial soil arching effect when the pile-soil stress ratio is 3.8, the limit state of the plane soil arching effect appears when the pile-soil stress ratio is 2.2; the soil arching effect under dynamic load has a certain extent attenuation comapated with under static load, position with stronger soil arching effect under static load has a greater attenuation degree under dynamic load, the development trend of the soil pressure between the piles with the vibration frequency is similar to the N-type, which is exactly the opposite of the change trend of the soil pressure on the top of the pile.

Key words: geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment, soil arching effect, geogrid, static and dynamic loads

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473
[1] LI Shui-jiang, TONG Yan-guang, WANG Jun, YING Meng-jie, LIU Fei-yu, . Cyclic shear properties of gravel-geogrid interface under bidirectional cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 291-298.
[2] DAI Tian-yi, XIAO Shi-guo, . Settlement calculation method of rigid pile composite foundation considering interaction between supported embankment and improved zone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[3] AHMAD Hussein, MAHBOUBI Ahmad, NOORZAD Ali, HOSEINI MOHAMMAD Hosein. Investigation of the influence of interaction of wraparound geogrid-sand on load bearing-settlement behavior of strip footing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2550-2567.
[4] LI Chun-lin. Curved solid failure model and calculation method of supporting pressure for shield tunnel excavation face [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[5] ZHU Hong-hu, GAO Yu-xin, LI Yuan-hai, NI Yu-fei, . Experimental study of pullout behavior of horizontal anchor plates in geogrid reinforced sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1207-1214.
[6] WANG Jia-quan, KANG Bo-wen, ZHOU Yuan-wu, TANG Ying, . Effect of coarse particle content on pull-out behavior of reinforced-soil interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1249-1260.
[7] HONG Cheng-yu, YANG Qiang, ZHAO Yong, CHEN Deng-wei, YU Wei. Strain monitoring mechanism of geogrids based on optical fiber sensing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(6): 1755-1764.
[8] ZHU Sheng, ZHANG Yuan, JIALIBIEKE Ahalibieke, YU Jian-qing, HE Zhao-sheng, . Joint inversion method of instantaneous and creep parameters of rockfill dam based on incremental analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[9] CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun. Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 954-962.
[10] CUI Peng-bo, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Yong, ZHU Zheng-guo, PAN Ying-dong, . Model test and particle flow numerical simulation of soil arch effect for unsaturated sandy soil tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
[11] WANG Wei, LIANG Xuan-yu, ZHANG Ming-tao, JIA Ze-yu, ZHANG Si-yi, WANG Qi-zhi. Experimental study on failure mechanism and crack density of sandstone under combined dynamic and static loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(10): 2647-2658.
[12] BAO Ning, WEI Jing, CHEN Jian-feng. Three dimensional discrete element analysis of soil arching in piled embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[13] ZHUANG Yan, LI Shao-bang, CUI Xiao-yan, DONG Xiao-qiang, WANG Kang-yu, . Investigation on dynamic response of subgrade and soil arching effect in piled embankment under high-speed railway loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[14] HUANG Yu-hua, XU Lin-rong, ZHOU Jun-jie, CAI Yu, . Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[15] YAN Feng-xiang, BAI Xiao-hong, DONG Xiao-qiang, . Experimental study of the frictional resistance characteristics of geogrids and construction residue interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(12): 3939-3946.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .