›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 379-386.

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Coulumb's unified solution of active earth pressure on retaining wall

PENG Ming-xiang   

  1. Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510663, China
  • Received:2007-08-10 Online:2009-02-10 Published:2011-01-27

Abstract:

Based on the limit equilibrium theory and by treating the backfill as an ideal elastoplastic material which followed the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion, some drawbacks of the Coulomb's earth pressure theory are pointed out, and it is explicitly postulated that the limit earth pressure results from the plastic soil body behind the retaining wall. By assuming that a family of slip lines in the plastic zone are straight lines, namely, the plane slip surfaces, a more reasonable slip wedge analysis model for clay is established to solve the active earth pressure on the retaining wall, the reaction force on slip surface and their distributions. The classical Coulomb's and Rankine's active earth pressures could be considered as the special cases of the solutions.

Key words: retaining wall, active earth pressure, limit equilibrium theory, plane slip surface, elastic overburden, plastic soil wedge

CLC Number: 

  • TU 432
[1] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[2] CHEN Jian-xu, SONG Wen-wu, . Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[3] RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[4] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, LEI Tao, LIU Qi, WANG Zhi-meng, LIU Yong, . Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[5] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[6] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, GAO Ze-fei, WANG Zhi-meng, . Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[7] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[8] LIU Yang, YU Peng-qiang. Analysis of soil arch and active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[9] WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan. Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
[10] ZHANG Xiao-xi, HE Si-ming, FAN Xiao-yi, . Seismic stability of L-shape retaining walls and determination method of sliding surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[11] ZHENG Jun-jie, LÜ Si-qi, CAO Wen-zhao, JING Dan, . Numerical simulation of composite rigid-flexible pile-supported retaining wall under the action of high-filled expansive soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[12] LIU Mei-lin, HOU Yan-Juan, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian. Research on active earth pressure of flexible retaining wall considering construction effect of foundation pit in sandy soil [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[13] LI Zhao-hua, HU Jie, FENG Ji-li, GONG Wen-jun. Numerical simulation of debris flow based on visco-elastoplastic constitutive model [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[14] YANG Shan-qi, LU Kun-lin, SHI Ke-bao, ZHAO Han-tian, CHEN Yi-ming,. Model tests on 3D slip surface of passive failure behind a rigid retaining wall [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[15] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, LIN Zhan-zhan, WANG Zhi-meng,. Limit analysis on yield acceleration and failure model of reinforced soil retaining walls using two-wedge method [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping,FENG Xing,HUANG Xiang,LI Chun-liang. Application of UH model to finite element analysis[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 237 -245 .
[2] WAN Shao-shi, NIAN Ting-kai, JIANG Jing-cai, LUAN Mao-tian. Discussion on several issues in slope stability analysis based on shear strength reduction finite element methods (SSR-FEM)[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[3] YAN Tie, LI Wei, BI Xue-liang. Research on effective stress model in porous media based on fractal method[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[4] XU Wei-sheng, CHAI Jun-rui, CHEN Xing-zhou, SUN Xu-shu. Study of nonlinear noncubic seepage in netwok rock and its application[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[5] SHEN Hai-chao, CHENG Yuan-fang, ZHAO Yi-zhong, ZHANG Jian-guo, XIA Yuan-bo. Research on in-situ stresses and borehole stability of coal seam in Jingbian gas field[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 123 -126 .
[6] ZHAO Yue-tang, LIN Jia-wei, SHI Lei. Research of spalling under impulse loading[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .
[7] ZHOU Jian-wu ,LOU Xiao-ming. Analysis of soil heave due to pile-sinking with pre-drilling in soft clay[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2839 -2844 .
[8] JI Mao-wei , WU Shun-chuan , GAO Yong-tao , GE Lin-lin , LI Xiao-jing . Construction monitoring and numerical simulation of multi-arch tunnel[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3787 -3795 .
[9] ZHOU Jia-wu, LIU Yuan-xue, LU Xin, ZHENG Ying-ren. Existence and decoupling for flow potential of geomaterials[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 375 -381 .
[10] LIU Xiao ,TANG Hui-ming ,XIONG Cheng-ren . Patterns, problems, and development trends of analysis methods for slope dynamic reliability[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1217 -1234 .