岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 2131-2140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0709CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0709

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2025年缅甸7.9级地震场地液化震害分析

陈龙伟1, 2,张文琦1, 2,甘声聪1, 2,肖琳1, 2,吴晓阳1, 2,谢小丽1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2. 地震灾害防治应急管理部重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-06 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 作者简介:陈龙伟,男,1983年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程、土动力学等方面的研究。E-mail: chenlw@iem.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No.2026C13)。

Analysis of the liquefaction damage following the 2025 Ms 7.9 Myanmar earthquake

CHEN Long-wei1, 2, ZHANG Wen-qi1, 2, GAN Sheng-cong1, 2, XIAO Lin1, 2, WU Xiao-yang1, 2, XIE Xiao-li1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2025-07-06 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2026C13).

摘要: 2025年3月28日缅甸中部发生了Ms 7.9级特大地震,造成了大量房屋损毁、人员伤亡以及经济损失。经过为期两周的现场调查,在地震重灾区的16个村(或社区)发现了典型的液化喷砂现象以及液化导致的房屋结构和基础设施的破坏,包括上百栋房屋、2座特大桥、部分道路路段和石油地下储罐等,同时还发现了液化侧移引发的大面积房屋垮塌和人员伤亡的罕见灾害案例。现场调查表明,此次地震触发的液化震害呈现出分布范围广、喷砂规模大、工程震害重等特点。液化产生的地裂缝是造成房屋结构毁坏的重要原因;地基承载力的丧失是液化对结构震害影响另一个因素,导致房屋结构的沉降与倾斜。此次地震液化是近年来报道的东南亚地区发生大规模地震液化事件,为该地区地震液化减灾技术和抗震救灾能力提升提供经验。通过对此次地震液化震害现象及特征分析,以期为我国地震液化减灾技术发展提供经验和启示。

关键词: 2025年缅甸地震, 液化, 现场调查, 结构震害, 启示

Abstract: On March 28th, 2025, a catastrophic earthquake measuring Ms 7.9 struck central Myanmar, resulting in extensive damage to buildings, significant casualties and tremendous economic loss. During a two-week on-site investigation, widespread liquefaction phenomena and the consequent damage to structures and infrastructures were investigated across 16 villages (or districts) within the earthquake affected regions. This examination encompassed hundreds of residential houses, two major bridges, several roads, and underground storage tanks, among others. Reports also detailed the consequences of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading, which led to the demolition of houses and casualties. The field survey of liquefaction revealed that the liquefaction phenomena and the associated damage were extensively distributed along the surface rupture, accompanied by substantial sand ejection and severe impacts on structures. Ground fissures resulting from liquefaction constituted a major cause of structural destruction in buildings. The loss of ground bearing capacity remained another impact of liquefaction on structural damage, resulting in subsidence and tilting of buildings. The cases of liquefaction in the Myanmar earthquake reported herein provided experience and lessons for anti-seismic design aimed at mitigating soil liquefaction risks in the Southeast Asia. Through the analysis of the phenomenon and characteristics of soil liquefaction, the methods and techniques for liquefaction hazard mitigation in China can be further refined and improved.

Key words: 2025 Myanmar earthquake, liquefaction, on-site survey, structural damage, lessons

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 姚肖飞, 陈育民, 陈润泽, 王志华, 冯义. 基于拉压表观黏度的饱和砂土液化流动特性和物态判别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1906-1916.
[2] 任中岳, 赵世春, 陈育民. 电解法减饱和对钙质砂地基爆炸液化的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2095-2104.
[3] 张钰洋, 袁晓铭, 陈龙伟, 袁近远, 王淼, 李瑞山, 吴晓阳. 液化场地地震动作用下典型建筑物易损性增量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1401-1416.
[4] 张西文, 江晓童, 吕颖慧, 邱 宇, 刘福震. 倾斜液化场地地铁车站地震响应和损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 1022-1030.
[5] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[6] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[7] 叶斌, 蒋记澳, 朱家志, 丁源, 林创基. 电解减饱和处理后砂土的非饱和状态稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3673-3682.
[8] 范猛, 杨正权, 李敬军, 刘小生, 赵剑明, . 基于支持向量机的土体地震液化判别模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3985-3997.
[9] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[10] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[11] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[12] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[13] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[14] THUY Do Van, TIEP Pham Duc, HIEU Nguyen Van, THANG Pham Cao. 循环三轴试验加载频率和压实度对重塑砂土液化行为的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1813-1823.
[15] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 国内外静力触探液化判别方法对比检验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!