岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 194-204.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2281

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析

于丽1, 2,吕城1, 2,段儒禹1, 2,王明年1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-19 修回日期:2019-05-06 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:于丽,女,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程的设计、研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划课题(No. 2017G007-G-2)

Upper bound limit analysis of three-dimensional collapse mechanism of shallow buried soil tunnel under pore pressure based on nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion

YU Li1, 2, LÜ Cheng1, 2, DUAN Ru-yu1, 2, WANG Ming-nian1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Traffic Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-12-19 Revised:2019-05-06 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by China Railway Corporation Science and Technology Research and Development Program (2017G007-G-2).

摘要: 浅埋土质隧道的稳定性研究一直是隧道工程的关键问题,而孔隙水压力的存在影响着浅埋土质隧道的安全。构建了隧道顶部为圆弧形的浅埋土质隧道的三维塌落机制,基于非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则和极限分析上限法,并考虑孔隙水压力的作用,推导出浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围及支护力的最优上限解计算公式。通过与既有研究进行对比,验证了所提方法的合理性。分析了不同参数对塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力的影响,结果表明:孔隙水压力对浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力有着显著的影响;孔隙水压力对塌落范围、塌落土体重力的影响比较复杂,而支护力都随着孔隙水压力系数的增大而增大;不同参数对浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力的影响规律不同。新方法可为浅埋土质隧道的设计优化提供理论支撑。

关键词: 浅埋土质隧道, 非线性破坏准则, 孔隙水压力, 三维塌落机制, 上限定理

Abstract: The stability study of shallow-buried soil tunnel has always been a key problem in tunnel engineering. The existence of pore water pressure can contribute to the collapse of shallow-buried soil tunnels that has serious influence over the safety of life and property. In this paper, the three-dimensional collapse mechanism of a shallow-buried earth tunnel with a circular top arc is constructed. Based on the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion and the limit analysis upper bound method, the collapse range of the shallow-buried earth tunnel is derived considering the pore water pressure. The formula for solving the optimal upper limit of support force is established. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with existing research for rationality verification of the method. The effects of different parameters on the collapse range, gravity and support force of the collapsed soil are analyzed. The results show that the pore water pressure has significant impact on the collapse range of the shallow buried soil tunnel as well as the gravity and support force of the collapsed soil. The effects of pore water pressure on the collapse range and weight of the collapsed soil are complex, while the support force increases with the increase of the pore water pressure coefficient. Moreover, the collapse range, gravity and support force of shallow soil tunnel are influenced with varying degrees by different parameters. This method can provide theoretical support for the design optimisation of shallow-buried soil tunnel.

Key words: shallow buried soil tunnel, nonlinear failure criterion, pore pressure, three-dimensional collapse mechanism, upper limit theorem

中图分类号: U 456.2
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[5] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[6] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[7] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[8] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[9] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[10] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[11] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[12] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[13] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
[14] 简涛, 孔令伟, 柏巍, 舒荣军, . 基于耗散能量的饱和黄土动孔压模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2238-2248.
[15] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!