岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 4035-4044.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0318

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

间歇型降雨对堆积层斜坡变形破坏的物理模拟研究

朱元甲1, 2,贺拿1,钟卫2,孔纪名2   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000;2. 中国科学院水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-19 修回日期:2020-05-30 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 通讯作者: 钟卫,男,1980年生,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事斜坡灾变理论及其控制技术研究工作。E-mail: zhongwei@imde.ac.cn E-mail: 2428466183@qq.com
  • 作者简介:朱元甲,男,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事滑坡预警及防治方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41302284);河南省博士后经费资助(No.19030069);中国石油化工股份有限公司科研基金(No.318022-8)。

Physical simulation study of deformation and failure accumulation layer slope caused by intermittent rainfall

ZHU Yuan-jia1, 2, HE Na1, ZHONG Wei2, KONG Ji-ming2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2020-03-19 Revised:2020-05-30 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41302284), the Henan Postdoctoral Funding(19030069) and the China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Research Fund(318022-8).

摘要: 为研究间歇型降雨作用下缓倾堆积层斜坡的变形破坏特征,以樱桃沟滑坡为例,进行了降雨作用下斜坡变形破坏的物理模拟研究。试验结果表明:前期降雨作用下坡体变形特征表现为前缘滑移沉陷、中部滑移、后缘沉陷、坡体裂缝生成,且前缘裂缝扩张明显,后期降雨作用下坡脚区域首先发生滑塌,然后依次向后缘传递发生逐阶滑塌破坏;降雨入渗易在基岩面上储存,形成暂态地下水位、高孔隙水压力区域和坡向渗流场,基岩面附近土体饱水时间长,软化程度高,抗剪强度弱化显著,边坡易沿基覆界面土层发生滑坡;坡体滑动易发生在降雨间歇期,触发特征表现为雨后坡体暂态饱和区水分和坡表积水持续下渗,导致地下水位上升滞后于降雨,造成坡体内浮托力、渗透力和孔隙水压力增大,有效应力降低,诱发滑坡。

关键词: 间歇型降雨, 缓倾堆积层斜坡, 物理模拟, 变形

Abstract: To study the deformation and failure characteristics of the slope of gently inclined accumulation layer caused by intermittent rainfall, taking the Yingtaogou landslide as an example, a physical simulation study on the slope deformation and failure under the action of rainfall was carried out. The results showed that under the action of early rainfall, the deformation characteristics of the slope body showed the sliding and subsidence at the leading edge, the sliding in the middle part, the subsidence at the rear edge, and the formation of slope cracks and the obvious expansion of leading-edge cracks. Under the action of late rainfall, the slope foot area was the first to slide, and then the sliding was transferred to the trailing edge resulting in progressive sliding failure. Rainfall infiltration was easy to store on the bedrock surface, forming transient groundwater level, high pore water pressure area and slope seepage field. The soil near the bedrock surface was saturated with water for a long time, so it had a high degree of softening, and a significant weakening in shear strength, causing the slope prone to landslide along the soil layer at the base interface. Slope sliding tended to occur during the rainfall intermittent period. The triggering characteristic of slope sliding were as follows: after rain, the continuous infiltration of the water in the transient saturated area of slope body and the accumulated water on the slope surface led to the rise of the groundwater level lagging behind the rainfall, causing the increase of buoyancy in the slope, permeability and pore water pressure, so that the effective stress in the slope body decreased, which induced the landslide.

Key words: intermittent rainfall, slope of gently inclined accumulation layer, physical simulation, deformation

中图分类号: TU42
[1] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[6] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[7] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[8] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[9] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[10] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[11] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[12] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[13] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[14] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[15] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!