岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 4137-4144.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0516

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

不同环境温度下土体含水率主动加热 光纤法监测试验研究

郭君仪1,孙梦雅1,施斌1,魏广庆2,刘洁1   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023;2. 苏州南智传感科技有限公司,江苏 苏州 215123
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-28 修回日期:2020-06-29 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 通讯作者: 施斌,男,1961年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,长期从事地质与岩土工程方面的监测与评价研究。E-mail: shibin@nju.edu.cn E-mail:gjy@smail.nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郭君仪,女,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质与地质灾害方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科研仪器研制项目(No.41427801);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41230636)

Experimental study of water content in soils monitored with active heated fiber optic method at different ambient temperatures

GUO Jun-yi1, SUN Meng-ya1, SHI Bin1, WEI Guang-qing2, LIU Jie1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 2. Suzhou Nanzee Sensing Co. Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
  • Received:2020-04-28 Revised:2020-06-29 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Major Scientific Research Instrument Development Project(41427801) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41230636).

摘要: 近年来,主动加热光纤(active heated fiber optical,AHFO)法因其具有长距离、耐久性好、分布式等优势,在土体含水率原位监测中不断得到应用。然而,由于我国一些地区土体的温度随四季变化很大,冬季土体温度甚至会达到零下几十度,土体中的水会发生相变,因此,研究不同环境温度对土体含水率AHFO法原位监测结果的影响具有重要意义。采用自主研发的内加热FBG刚玉管传感器,在?20~40 ℃下对3个不同含水率的试样进行了测试。研究结果表明,在试样含水率不高于8.8%时,不同温度下测得的试样含水率最大误差小于量程的1.5%,测量精度较高,在实际测量中可忽略环境温度的影响。当试样含水率高于8.8%时,正温区含水率测量的最大误差仅为量程的1.34%,测量精度仍较高;而在负温区时,由于自由水和毛细水在低于0 ℃时发生相变,导致热传递机制和试样结构发生变化,原来的标定公式不再适用,故需重新标定含水率测量的相关参数。研究结果为该技术的进一步完善和推广应用提供了重要依据。

关键词: 主动加热光纤法, 土体, 原位含水率, 环境温度, 误差分析

Abstract: In recent years, the active heated fiber optic(AHFO) method has been widely applied in the in-situ soil water content due to its ability to be used in long distance, good durability and distributed monitoring. However, the soil temperature in some areas in China varies greatly with seasons. The soil temperature reaches dozens of degrees below zero in winter, causing the water to freeze. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the influence of different ambient temperatures on the in-situ monitoring results of soil water content using AHFO method. In this paper, the self-developed internally heating alundum tube FBG sensor was used to monitor three loess samples with different water contents at a temperature of ?20 to 40 ℃. The results show that when the water content of the loess is not higher than 8.8%, the maximum error of water content measured at different temperatures is less than 1.5% of the range. Since the measurement accuracy is high, the effect of ambient temperature on the monitoring results of water content of soils can be ignored in the actual measurement. When the water content of loess is higher than 8.8%, the maximum error of the measurement of the water content in the positive temperature zone accounts for about 1.34% of the range, and the measurement accuracy is still high. In the negative temperature zone, since free water and capillary water undergo phase transition when the temperature is lower than 0 ℃, the heat transfer mechanism and sample structure change. As a result, the original calibration formula is no longer applicable. Therefore, it is necessary to recalibrate the relevant parameters in water content measurement. The research results provide important reference value for further improvement and application of this technology.

Key words: active heated fiber optical method, soil, in-situ water content, ambient temperature, error analysis

中图分类号: TU411.2
[1] 郑晨, 白强强, 黄克起, 刘晓敏, 张强, 何晓佩, 宋立伟, . 黏土中竖井开挖诱发地层三维变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 335-342.
[2] 王天亮, 范帅波, 高毅仁, 张飞, 寇晓康, . 单向冻结条件下路基双层土体层间水分迁移机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2873-2884.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[5] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[6] 雷舒羽, 曹净, 刘海明, 张兴文, 张柠锐. 工程碱性环境中泥炭土体结构性损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2135-2146.
[7] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[8] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 李开超, 王丽琴, . 基于原位浸水试验的黄土软化力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1851-1864.
[9] 杨智勇, 丁宇超, 冷振东, 刘志军, 黎学优, . 基于大数据融合技术的稀疏测量场地三维概率化重构[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1881-1896.
[10] 陶袁钦, 潘孙珏徐, 孙宏磊, 聂艳侠, . 基于多元概率分布的土体硬化模型参数预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1392-1408.
[11] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[12] 曹净, 雷舒羽, 刘海明, 张兴文. 水泥水化碱性环境下腐殖酸溶蚀性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 437-448.
[13] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[14] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[15] 王莘晴, 张晓超, 裴向军, . 弃渣土体分形级配方程及最大干密度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3157-3166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!