岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3327-3334.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0894

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的应变速率效应

李新明,贾亚垒,王志留,尹松   

  1. 中原工学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-13 修回日期:2022-08-03 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 王志留,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土力学及边坡工程方面的工作。E-mail: wzl8925@163.com E-mail:xinmingli01@163.com
  • 作者简介:李新明,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事特殊土力学及边坡工程方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51509274);河南省高校青年骨干教师项目(No.2019GGJS142,No.2020GGJS136);河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目(No.YJS2022SZ16);河南省科技攻关项目(No.222102320060);河南省高等学校计划基础研究专项(No.20ZX009)。

Strain rate effect of the shear mechanical properties of undisturbed expansive soil

LI Xin-ming, JIA Ya-lei, WANG Zhi-liu, YIN Song   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
  • Received:2022-06-13 Revised:2022-08-03 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509274), the Henan Provincial College Young Backbone Teacher Project (2019GGJS142, 2020GGJS136), the Henan Postgraduate Education Reform and Quality Improvement Project (YJS2022SZ16), the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (222102320060) and the Basic Research Project of Henan Provincial Key Scientific Research Project(20ZX009).

摘要:

为研究应变速率对原状膨胀土力学性状的影响,通过GDS三轴试验系统进行了不同速率和围压下的固结不排水三轴剪切试验,分析了应力−应变曲线、孔隙水压力、剪切强度以及破坏模式随应变速率的变化规律。结果表明:不同应变速率下,膨胀土应力−应变曲线均呈应变硬化型。随着应变速率的增加,不排水剪切强度单调递增,引入应变速率参数ρ 0.9后发现,不排水强度增长率为14.3%~23.2%,平均值为18.4%。低围压下,应变速率对孔隙水压力影响较小,随着围压的增大,孔隙水压力的发展趋势由软化型转变为硬化型,孔隙水压力峰值随应变速率的增大而减小。原状膨胀土应变速率效应与其多裂隙性密切相关,破坏形式表现为小应变速率下主剪切带与次剪切带共存,大应变速率下仅有主剪切带,裂隙或多剪切带的出现强化了膨胀土强度的应变速率效应。

关键词: 原状膨胀土, 应变速率, 不排水剪切强度, 孔隙水压力

Abstract:

In order to study the effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of undisturbed expansive soil, the consolidated undrained triaxial shear tests at different rates and confining pressures were conducted by the GDS triaxial test system. The variations of stress-strain curves, pore water pressure, shear strength and failure pattern influenced by strain rates were analyzed. The results show that the stress-strain curves of expansive soil show a strain harden pattern at different strain rates. With the increase of strain rate, the undrained shear strength increases monotonically. After introducing the strain rate parameter ρ 0.9, it is found that the undrained strength increases by 14.3% to 23.2% for a 10-fold change in strain rate, with an average value of 18.4%. The strain rate has less effect on the pore water pressure at a low confining pressure, and the development trend of pore water pressure changes from softening to hardening type with increase confining pressure, and the peak pore water pressure decreases with increase strain rate. The strain rate effect of undisturbed expansive soil is closely related to its fissures. The failure pattern is manifested by the coexistence of main and sub shear zones at smaller strain rates, while the failure pattern is only the main shear zone at larger strain rates. The presence of fissures or multiple shear zones enhance the strain rate effect of expansive soil dramatically.

Key words: undisturbed expansive soil, strain rate, undrained shear strength, pore water pressure

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[5] 周振华, 孔令伟, 李甜果, 舒荣军, . 原状膨胀土裂隙演变性状的环境效应与表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 402-412.
[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[8] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[9] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[10] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[11] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[12] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
[13] 简涛, 孔令伟, 柏巍, 舒荣军, . 基于耗散能量的饱和黄土动孔压模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2238-2248.
[14] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[15] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!