岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 918-931.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1176

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究

周泽华1,吕艳1,苏生瑞1,刁钰恒1,王祚鹏1,王剑昆2,赵辉3   

  1. 1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 中国地质环境监测院,北京 100081;3. 陕西翠华山国家地质公园,陕西 西安 710105
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-30 修回日期:2021-09-18 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 吕艳,女,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质环境调查评价、地质灾害风险管理、地质景观资源保护利用等方面的研究工作。 E-mail: lyuyan1118@163.com E-mail:zehua309@yeah.net
  • 作者简介:周泽华,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡地震工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41672285);成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金(No. SKLGP2018K015);中央高校基本科研业务创新团队支持项目(No. 300102262908);山西省地勘项目(No. 220126200089)

Seismic response and failure characteristics of granite slope using large-scale shaking table test

ZHOU Ze-hua1, LÜ Yan1, SU Sheng-rui1, DIAO Yu-heng1, WANG Zuo-peng1, WANG Jian-kun2, ZHAO Hui3   

  1. 1. College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. China Institute of Geo-Environmental Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China; 3. The Geopark of Shaanxi Cuihua Mountain, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710105, China
  • Received:2021-07-30 Revised:2021-09-18 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672285), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project, Chengdu University of Technology (SKLGP2018K015), the Scientific Research and Innovation Projects for the Central Universities (300102262908) and the Shanxi Geological Prospecting Project (220126200089).

摘要: 地震触发的岩质边坡崩塌常造成巨大的灾害,特定地质条件下边坡地震动力响应及破坏机制是工程中的重要难题。以翠华山水湫池崩塌为研究对象,开展振动台试验,研究地震作用下受断层控制的岩质边坡动力响应及破坏机制。试验发现,当断层倾角大于临界角时,不连续界面处的部分反射波与透射波转变为滑行波,使得断层处加速度响应出现突变;模型边坡内部加速度峰值放大系数变化特征表现出显著的三阶段变化趋势;水平加速度响应呈现出随高程增加不断增大的特征,而竖直加速度峰值放大系数增加幅度较小;模型边坡的固有频率变化曲线可以分为3个阶段,整体呈现下降的趋势,表明模型动力特性发生变化。通过对比振动台试验与水湫池崩塌原型,发现含断层结构岩质边坡的主要破坏模式为边坡顶部在地震荷载作用下首先出现贯通的竖直拉裂缝,随后断层上盘破碎岩体裂解破坏,最终沿断层面发生剪切滑动。研究工作将为秦岭花岗岩地震山崩的风险预警提供研究示范,并为开发秦岭山崩遗迹提供科技支撑。

关键词: 水湫池崩塌, 断层, 振动台试验, 地震动力响应特征, 动力破坏特征

Abstract: Huge hazards are often caused by earthquake-induced rock slope failure. The study of dynamic response characteristics and failure mechanism of the rock slope in certain geological condition is an important issue in geotechnical engineering. Taking the Shuiqiuchi rock slope failure as an object of study, a shaking table test was carried out to study the dynamic response and failure mechanism of rock slope controlled by faults. The testing results show that when the dip angle of the fault is greater than a specific critical angle, part of the reflected and transmitted waves at the discontinuous interface change into sliding waves, resulting in a sudden change in the acceleration response at the fault. The peak acceleration amplification factor inside of the model slope presents a significant three-stage trend. Peak horizontal acceleration amplification factor increases obviously with the increase of elevation, while peak vertical acceleration amplification factor increases slightly with elevation. The natural frequency curve of the model slope can be divided into three stages with a downward trend, which indicates that the dynamic characteristics of the model have changed. By comparing the shaking table test with the Shuiqiuchi rock slope failure prototype, it is found that the main failure mode of the rock slope with fault structure is that the top of the slope first shows vertical tension cracks under the seismic load, followed by cracking damage of the broken rock body on the upper plate of the fault, and finally shear sliding occurs along the fault surface. This research will set example for the early risk warning of granite rock slope failure, and provide the basic data and scientific support for the development of Qinling Mountain geological heritages.

Key words: Shuiqiuchi rock avalanche, fault, shaking table test, seismic dynamic response characteristics, dynamic failure characteristics

中图分类号: P 64
[1] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 钟祖良, 杜传烨, 刘新荣, 李超, . 岩石顶管穿越深大断层破碎带摩阻力 计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 943-954.
[4] 张荣, 赵斌, 郑小川, 陈令, 卢正, 赵阳, . 新型盐渍土基泡沫轻质土隔断层阻盐机制及效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 515-526.
[5] 赵扬锋, 龚政, 王凯兴, 司绪, 刘玉春, 张丽丽, 梁钦锋, . 不同粗糙度岩石界面断层滑移失稳过程电荷感应信号特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3355-3370.
[6] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[7] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[8] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[9] 贺元源, 彭绮澜, 王力, 王世梅, 佴磊, 徐燕, 吕岩, 陈勇, 张先伟, . 基于多微观手段的季冻区草炭土孔隙特征和渗透性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 110-122.
[10] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[11] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[12] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[13] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[14] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[15] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!