岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3415-3423.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0322

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解

余俊,张志中,郑靖凡,和振   

  1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-16 接受日期:2023-05-18 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 作者简介:余俊,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土及地下工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52078496)

Analytical solution of pore pressure in seepage field of foundation pit with a sealed bottom under water level fluctuation

YU Jun, ZHANG Zhi-zhong, ZHENG Jing-fan, HE Zhen   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2023-03-16 Accepted:2023-05-18 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078496).

摘要: 对水位波动条件下有封底基坑二维渗流场孔压响应进行了解析研究。将基坑周围土体划分为多个区域,应用叠加原理和分离变量法将各区域超静孔压响应分布用级数形式进行表达,结合区域间边界条件和连续条件求解系数矩阵,得到水位波动条件下有封底层基坑二维渗流场超静孔压分布的显式解析解。将解析解结果与数值计算结果进行对比,验证了解析方法的正确性。基于该解析解进一步给出了水位波动引起出逸比降和涌水量的计算公式,对封底层作用效果和封底层厚度、渗透系数变化产生的影响进行了探讨,并结合基坑工程实例进行了分析。结果表明:随着封底层厚度减小和渗透系数增大,出逸比降和单宽渗流量均增大,但增大的速率降低。

关键词: 解析解, 基坑, 渗流, 水位波动, 孔压

Abstract: The pore pressure response of two-dimensional seepage field of a foundation pit with a sealed bottom under the condition of water level fluctuation is studied analytically. The soil around the pit is divided into several regions, and the excess pore water pressure response distribution in each region is expressed in the form of a series by applying the superposition principle and the separation variable method, and the coefficient matrix is solved by combining the inter-region boundary conditions and the continuity conditions to obtain the explicit analytical solution of the excess pore water pressure distribution of the two-dimensional seepage field in the pit with a capping layer under the fluctuation of water level. The results of the analytical solution are compared with the numerical results, and the correctness of the analytical method is verified. Based on this analytical solution, calculation formulae for the outflow ratio drop and water inflow caused by water level fluctuations are further provided. The sealing effect of the bottom layer and influences of the bottom layer thickness and permeability coefficient changes are discussed through a pit project example. The results show that the outflow ratio drop and single width seepage discharge are increased, but the rate of increase reduces as the bottom layer thickness decreases and the permeability coefficient increases.

Key words: analytical solution, foundation pit, seepage flow, water level fluctuation, pore pressure

中图分类号: TU46+3
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[3] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[4] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[5] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[6] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[7] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[8] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[9] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[10] 吴盾, 孙林, 陆建伟, 于秉坤, 蔡国军, . 火壤工程地质原位探测技术研究进展与孔压静力触探应用展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2308-2324.
[11] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[12] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[13] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[14] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[15] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!