岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2566-2578.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1642

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究

王志颖1,郭明珠1,曾金艳2,王晨1,刘晃1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 山西省地震局,山西 太原 030021
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20 接受日期:2023-02-07 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 曾金艳,女,1970年生,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事边坡工程、活动构造、地震工程和地球物理勘探研究工作。E-mail: 13903412202@163.com E-mail:wangzhiying@emails.bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王志颖,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事斜坡地震动力响应相关的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(No.2018YFC1505001)。

Experimental study on dynamic response of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under earthquake

WANG Zhi-ying1, GUO Ming-zhu1, ZENG Jin-yan2, WANG Chen1, LIU Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Earthquake Administration of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030021, China
  • Received:2022-10-20 Accepted:2023-02-07 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505001).

摘要: 以青藏高原金沙江流域下归洼滑坡为原型,开展了含软弱夹层的顺层岩质斜坡振动台模型试验,基于斜坡峰值加速度PGA的放大系数和Hibert-Huang变换(Hibert-Huang transform,简称HHT)时频特征分析地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡动力响应规律。试验结果表明:斜坡在地震作用下表现出明显“高程效应”和“趋表效应”,PGA在坡表距离坡底1/4高度处、坡顶、软弱夹层处较大。随着输入地震动强度的增加,斜坡刚度逐渐降低,自振频率逐渐减小。当输入波幅值达到0.7g之后,斜坡发生开裂和结构变形。输入波幅值相同的情况下,PGA放大系数与高程呈正相关,同一测点随着输入波幅值增加,放大系数逐渐下降,不同输入波的类型和时间压缩比对斜坡动力响应影响差异较大。Hilbert谱显示,高程和软弱夹层对地震波能量有放大作用,高频部分的能量放大尤其明显。Hilbert边际谱表明,软夹层作用下高频部分的累积能量放大明显,在坡表距离坡底1/4高度处的测点能量突然增大,与加速度放大效应部分的结论类似;Hilbert边际谱显示,随着输入地震波幅值增加,高频部分和代表斜坡自振频率部分的累积能量逐渐降低,输入地震波主频部分的累积能量逐渐占据主导地位,表明斜坡逐渐损伤破坏,斜坡的模态特性逐渐消失。

关键词: 振动台试验, 边坡工程, 顺层岩质斜坡, 软弱夹层, 动力响应, HHT时频分析

Abstract: In this study, the “Xiaguiwa” landslide in Jinsha River Basin of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is taken as a prototype, and the shaking table model test on bedding rock slope with weak interlayer is carried out. The dynamic response of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under earthquake is studied from the aspects of peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification factor and Hibert-Huang transform (HHT) time-frequency characteristics. The results show that the slope exhibits obvious “elevation effect” and “surface effect” under the action of input seismic waves. The PGA is larger at the 1/4 height of the slope surface from the bottom of the slope, the top of the slope, and the weak interlayer. With the increase of the intensity of the input seismic waves, the slope stiffness and natural vibration frequency decrease gradually. When the input wave amplitude reaches 0.7g, the slope cracking and structural deformation occur. When the input amplitudes are the same, the PGA amplification coefficient is positively correlated with the elevation, and decreases gradually with the increase of the input amplitudes at the same measuring point. The influences of different input wave types and time scale factors on the slope dynamic response are significantly different. The Hilbert spectrum shows that the elevation and weak interlayer amplify the energy of seismic waves, especially the high-frequency part. The Hilbert marginal spectrum shows that the weak interlayer could amplify the energy of the high-frequency part. The Hilbert marginal spectrum indicates that the cumulative energy of the high-frequency part is significantly amplified under the influence of soft interlayer, and the energy of the measuring point at the 1/4 height of the slope surface from the bottom of the slope suddenly increases, which is similar to the conclusion of the acceleration amplification effect. The results of Hilbert marginal spectrum shows that with the increase of the amplitude of the input seismic wave, the cumulative energy of the high-frequency part and the part representing the natural vibration frequency of the slope gradually decrease, and the energy of the main frequency part of the input seismic wave gradually dominates, indicating that the modal characteristics of the slope gradually disappear.

Key words: shaking table tests, slope engineering, bedding rock slope, weak interlayer, dynamic response, HHT time-frequency analysis

中图分类号: TU435
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[8] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[9] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[12] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[14] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!