岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 507-516.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1788

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究

陕耀1, 2,董雅丞1, 2,张旭辉3,姚西平4, 5   

  1. 1. 同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海 201804;2. 上海市轨道交通结构耐久与系统安全重点实验室,上海 201804;3. 南京地铁建设有限责任公司,江苏 南京 210017;4. 江苏省铁路集团有限公司,江苏 南京 210012;5. 江苏省智能与绿色铁路工程研究中心,江苏 南京 210012
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-24 接受日期:2024-02-19 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 董雅丞,男,2000年生,博士研究生,主要从事土力学方面的研究。E-mail: 2310809@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陕耀,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事轨道交通线路系统动力学、路基沉降控制、基坑工程等领域的研究和教学工作。E-mail: shanyao@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(No.51708424)。

Field measurement study of earth pressure on a double-layered diaphragm wall

SHAN Yao1, 2, DONG Ya-cheng1, 2, ZHANG Xu-hui3, YAO Xi-ping4, 5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; 2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Shanghai 201804, China; 3. Nanjing Metro Construction Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210017, China; 4. Jiangsu Railway Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 300308, China; 5. Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Intelligent and Green Railway, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012, China
  • Received:2023-11-24 Accepted:2024-02-19 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708424).

摘要: 南京某超深基坑工程采用异形围护结构双层地下连续墙进行施工,双墙间土体处于非极限平衡状态,土压力分布演变形式及墙土间相互作用机制并不明确。为探明深基坑开挖施工引起的双墙间有限土体的土压力变化规律及墙外侧土拱效应对土压力分布的影响,采用现场实测分析结合物理模型计算的方法开展研究。首先,通过现场试验在土层中布设土压力监测点,获取基坑开挖过程中墙间土压力演变规律;其后,建立考虑土体分层的曲面锥形土拱模型,计算侧土拱发展引起的墙外土压力变化量,并结合试验数据的参数反演和误差分析对模型计算结果的准确性展开讨论。研究结果表明:基坑开挖施工对双墙间土体的影响总体呈现为挤压变形,有限土体受到的侧向约束作用有助于进一步发挥土体的抗剪强度;基坑开挖各工序中土方开挖过程对地层扰动最为显著;侧土拱效应进一步增大了浅层土体挡土墙侧土压力,而中深层土体中几乎没有侧土拱发展;考虑侧土拱效应的土压力计算结果较传统水土分算的Coulomb理论计算方法与现场实测结果更加吻合。本研究可为异型围护结构的深基坑工程设计及施工提供思路与建议。

关键词: 地下连续墙, 土压力, 现场实测, 侧土拱效应, 对比分析

Abstract: A super-deep foundation pit project in Nanjing is constructed with a double diaphragm wall of shaped enclosure structure. The soil between the double walls is in a non-limit equilibrium state, and the evolution of soil pressure distribution and the mechanism of wall-soil interaction are not well understood. To investigate the soil pressure variation within the limited soil body between the double walls caused by deep foundation pit excavation, and to examine the influence of the soil arching effect on the soil pressure distribution outside the walls, this study employs a combination of on-site measurement analysis and physical model calculations. Initially, earth pressure monitoring points are established within the soil layers through field testing, aiming to capture the evolution of earth pressure between the walls during the excavation process. Subsequently, a curved conical soil arch model is established, taking into account the layering of the soil body. This model calculates the changes in earth pressure outside the walls due to the development of lateral soil arches. The accuracy of the model’s results is then discussed through parameter inversion and error analysis of the experimental data. The findings reveal that the excavation process predominantly impacts the soil between the double walls by causing compressive deformation. The lateral constraints imposed on this limited soil body contribute to further enhancing its shear strength. Among various excavation stages, the soil excavation process significantly disturbs the geological layers. The lateral soil arching effect further increases the earth pressure on the shallow soil retaining wall, while there is almost no development of lateral soil arches in the middle and deep soil layers. When considering the lateral soil arching effect, the calculated soil pressure aligns more closely with field measurements compared to the traditional Coulomb theory method, which separately calculates soil and water pressures. This study can provide insights and suggestions for the design and construction of deep foundation pit projects with special-shaped enclosure structures.

Key words: diaphragm wall, earth pressure, field measurements, lateral soil arch effect, comparative analysis

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] 卞海丁, 魏进, 王锦涛. 超大跨径管拱形钢波纹管涵洞的受力特性与土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[5] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[6] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[7] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[8] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[9] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[10] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[11] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[12] 刘志春, 马博, 胡指南, 张振波, 杜孔泽, . 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
[13] 吴九江, 肖琳, 王丽娟, 张祎, . 基于粒子图像测速技术的节状地下连续墙变形特性与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2707-2718.
[14] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[15] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!