岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 821-832.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1314

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究

曹苏南1,李春红1,陈远兵2,费康1   

  1. 1. 扬州大学 建筑科学与工程学院,江苏 扬州 225127;2. 扬州水利建筑工程有限责任公司,江苏 扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-21 接受日期:2024-12-15 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 李春红,女,1992年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事桩?土相互作用方面的研究工作。E-mail: chunhgli@yzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曹苏南,女,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事桩−土界面特性方面的研究工作。E-mail: caosn1998@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52108345);江苏省(扬州大学)研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(No.KYCX23_3539)。

Shear characteristics of biomimetic sand-structure interface under cyclic loading conditions

CAO Su-nan1, LI Chun-hong1, CHEN Yuan-bing2, FEI Kang1   

  1. 1. College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127, China; 2. Yangzhou Water Conservancy Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
  • Received:2024-10-21 Accepted:2024-12-15 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108345) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Yangzhou University) (KYCX23_3539).

摘要: 海上抗拔基础等工程可以利用蛇皮仿生界面正反摩擦异性提升承载性能,此类界面实际可能承受波浪、地震等循环荷载。为了解循环荷载作用下土−结构物仿生界面的正反摩擦异性特征,基于界面循环剪切仪,开展系列砂土−结构物仿生界面循环直剪试验,研究循环初始位置、法向应力、仿生界面表观形态、砂土相对密实度对循环剪切各向异性的影响规律,初步探讨循环后的抗剪强度演化特性。研究结果表明,循环初始位置和法向应力增大均导致界面颅向→尾向循环路径下剪切各向异性增大,尾向→颅向路径下剪切各向异性减小;界面鳞片长度与高度的比值对中等密实下的仿生界面剪切各向异性影响不明显;但是砂土相对密实度增大,此比值对颅向→尾向循环剪切路径下的剪切各向异性影响显著增大,对尾向→颅向循环路径下剪切各向异性影响略微增加。恒定应力条件下,经过两种循环路径后的仿生界面单向剪切峰值强度均大于未经历循环的单向剪切峰值强度,界面峰值摩擦角也明显增加。研究成果将为相关工程的优化应用提供重要参考。

关键词: 砂土, 仿生界面, 循环荷载, 剪切各向异性, 抗剪强度

Abstract: The directional frictional anisotropy of snake-skin-inspired interfaces has great potential to improve the load-bearing performance of offshore uplift pile foundations and other engineering applications. Such interfaces are designed to withstand cyclic loads, including those induced by waves and earthquakes. To investigate the characteristics of directional frictional anisotropy of soil-structure bio-inspired interfaces under cyclic loading, a series of cyclic direct shear tests were conducted using an advanced interface cyclic shear apparatus. The study examined the effects of initial cyclic position, normal stress, bio-inspired interface morphology, and sand density on cyclic shear anisotropy, along with an initial exploration of shear strength characteristics following cyclic loading. The findings revealed that increasing initial position of the cycle and normal stress enhanced shear anisotropy under the cranial-caudal cyclic loading path, while reducing shear anisotropy under the caudal-cranial cyclic loading path. For interfaces at moderate densities, variations in the ratio of interface scale length to height exhibited negligible effects on shear anisotropy. However, as sand density increased, the influence of this ratio on shear anisotropy became more pronounced under the cranial-caudal cyclic shear path, with a slightly increased effect observed under the caudal-cranial cyclic path. Under constant stress conditions, the peak shear strengths in monotonic shear tests of the bio-inspired interfaces following both types of cyclic shear paths exceeded those observed without prior cyclic shearing, and it was also found that the peak interface friction angle increased significantly. These findings provide valuable insights for the optimization and practical application of bio-inspired interfaces in engineering projects.

Key words: sand, bio-inspired interface, cyclic loading, shear anisotropy, shear strength

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[4] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[5] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[8] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[9] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[10] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[11] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 叶斌, 蒋记澳, 朱家志, 丁源, 林创基. 电解减饱和处理后砂土的非饱和状态稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3673-3682.
[14] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[15] 刘畅, 代丽媛, 李彪, 童富果, 田斌, 周铨. 干湿循环作用下宽饱和度范围红壤土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3811-3822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!