岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 209-218.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0368CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0368

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究

吴金标1,曾柳祁2,江益辉3,槐荣国2,曾程4   

  1. 1.中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙410083;2.中铁五局集团电务工程有限责任公司,湖南 长沙410205; 3.中铁南方投资集团有限公司,广东 深圳 518054;4.长沙理工大学 交通运输学院,湖南 长沙410114
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-10 接受日期:2025-11-12 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 曾程,女,1989年生,博士,特聘教授,主要从事交通基础设施智能建养方面的研究工作。E-mail: cheng.zeng@csust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴金标,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下管廊工程相关方面的研究工作。E-mail: jinbiao.wu@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No.52308385和No.52408462);湖南省自然科学基金(No.2025JJ60341);湖南省教育厅基金项目(No.23C0141);长沙市自然科学基金(No.kq2402025)

Uplift resistance of shallow-buried pipes in unsaturated sand under different saturation levels

WU Jin-biao1, ZENG Liu-qi2, JIANG Yi-hui3, HUAI Rong-guo2, ZENG Cheng4   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. China Railway No.5 Bureau Group Electric Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410205, China; 3. China Railway South Investment Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518054, China; 4. School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2025-04-10 Accepted:2025-11-12 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52308385, 52408462), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2025JJ60341), the Hunan Provincial Department of Education Foundation (23C0141) and the Changsha City Natural Science Foundation (kq2402025).

摘要: 隧道开挖、滑坡、断层等人工或者地质活动引起的场地变形会对浅埋管道安全造成严重威胁。然而,现有埋地管道相关研究多基于饱和土力学理论,忽略了非饱和砂土中基质吸力对管-土相互作用的影响。开展了6组不同饱和度条件下浅埋管道室内模型试验,通过在管顶与45°剪切带范围内同步布置张力计并结合粒子图像测速(particle image velocimetry,简称PIV)技术获取位移场,定量揭示了管道上拔过程中“吸力-变形-破坏”协同演化规律。在此基础上,提出基于倒梯形楔形破坏模式与极限平衡原理的简化管-土相互作用力学计算模型,将等效吸力应力显式并入抗剪强度,推导得到上拔管土极限抗力公式。结果表明:非饱和砂土因基质吸力使峰值管-土上拔抗力较干/饱和提高约3~4倍,达到峰值的位移也增大约30%。管周土体破坏呈倒梯形楔形体,非饱和工况下的楔形土体宽度为6DD为管道外径)、剪切带倾角为40°,显著大于干燥/饱和工况(4和25°),并且所建立的简化管-土上拔抗力计算模型对本试验及文献历史数据的预测误差基本控制在±15%。形成了“吸力与位移场变化-变形破坏机制识别-简化力学模型解析”的一体化框架,所提出的简化力学模型可以较好用于不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔极限抗力的工程估算与设计校核。

关键词: 浅埋管道, 上拔抗力, 土体基质吸力, 破坏模式, 模型试验

Abstract: Ground deformation caused by geological or human activities, such as tunnel excavation, landslides, and faulting, can seriously threaten the integrity of shallow-buried pipelines. However, most studies of buried pipelines rely on saturated-soil mechanics and neglect the influence of matric suction on pipe-soil interaction in unsaturated sand. This study conducted six laboratory model tests on shallow-buried pipes in sand under varying saturation conditions. Tensiometers were installed concurrently at the pipe crown and within a 45° shear band. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the displacement field, enabling quantification of the coupled evolution of suction, deformation, and failure during pipe uplift. Based on these observations, we propose a simplified mechanical model of pipe-soil interaction. The model assumes an inverted-trapezoidal wedge failure mode and applies limit-equilibrium theory. Equivalent suction stress is incorporated into shear strength to derive a closed-form expression for the ultimate uplift resistance. Results show that matric suction increases peak pipe-soil uplift resistance in unsaturated sand to approximately 3-4 times the value observed in dry or saturated conditions. The displacement required to reach this peak increases by about 30%. Around the pipe, soil fails as an inverted trapezoidal wedge. Under unsaturated conditions, the wedge width is approximately 6DD is the outer diameter of pipeline)and the shear-band inclination about 40°, significantly larger than the 4D width and 25° inclination observed in dry or saturated sand. The simplified analytical model predicts both the current experimental data and published sand data with errors generally within ±15%. We establish an integrated framework linking the evolution of suction and displacement fields, identification of deformation and failure mechanisms, and simplified mechanics-based analysis. The simplified mechanical model can be used for engineering estimates and design verification of ultimate uplift resistance for shallow-buried pipelines in sand at various saturation levels.

Key words: shallow-buried pipes, uplift resistance, soil suction, failure mechanism, model test

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[3] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[4] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[5] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[8] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[9] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[10] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[11] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[12] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[13] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[14] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[15] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!