岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3439-3251.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1128CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1128

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环与往返渗流协同诱发消落带土体损伤与浅层破坏的模型试验研究

陈勇1, 2,杨晓东2,贺元源1, 2,王力1, 2   

  1. 1.三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌,443002;2.三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-23 接受日期:2026-04-13 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 贺元源,男,1996年生,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事特殊土力学及岩土体多场耦合模型方面研究。E-mail: heyuanyuan@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈勇,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土-水耦合作用机制及岩土体稳定性评价方面研究。E-mail: cyonger@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42272317);国家自然科学基金联合基金重点项目(No.U21A2031);宜昌市自然科学研究项目(No.A24-3-020)。

Model test study on soil damage and shallow failure of hydro-fluctuation belt induced by combined action of wetting-drying cycles and reciprocal seepage

CHEN Yong1, 2, YANG Xiao-dong2, HE Yuan-yuan1, 2, WANG Li1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-10-23 Accepted:2026-04-13 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272317), the Key Program of the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A2031) and the Science Research Project of Yichang (A24-3-020).

摘要: 库水位周期性涨落长期作用下,土质岸坡局部塌岸乃至滑坡前缘变形破坏是常见的地质灾害现象。将该水力影响解读为反复干湿循环与周期往返渗流的协同作用,采用自主研制的模型试验装置,以间断级配土体构建碎石土岸坡,分别模拟多周期干湿循环、往返渗流各自单独作用及二者交替联合作用,分析岸坡土体细颗粒流失规律和表层裂隙发育进程,持续监测坡体孔隙水压力、体积含水率及位移场演化,从而揭示干裂与侵蚀对消落带土体的协同损伤机制及岸坡宏观变形破坏的影响规律。研究表明:干湿循环诱发坡表土体裂隙网络的不断发育和假性愈合,往返渗流导致土中细颗粒大量流失;在二者交替联合作用下,干缩裂隙会破坏土体完整性且形成优势渗流通道,并加剧细颗粒流失,而渗流侵蚀也将导致骨架粗颗粒裸露、裂隙愈合能力减弱、土体渗透性增加,即呈现干裂与侵蚀的相互影响特征,且对土体的结构损伤具有协同加剧效应,进而促使岸坡模型更早发生破坏,主要诱因归结为土体结构显著损伤和渗透水压力的共同驱动作用。研究结果为厘清库水周期涨落作用与岸坡持续变形发展的内在联系、更加准确地开展岸坡变形分析预测提供理论依据和技术支撑。

关键词: 干湿循环, 渗流侵蚀, 结构损伤, 浅层破坏, 模型试验

Abstract: Under the long-term influence of periodic water level fluctuations in the reservoir, bank collapse and frontal deformation of soil slopes are common geological disasters. By interpreting the hydraulic forcing as the coupled action of repeated wetting-drying cycles and periodic reciprocating seepage, this study employs a self-developed model testing device to construct a gravel slope using discontinuously graded soil. The individual and combined effects of multiple wetting-drying cycles and reciprocating seepage are simulated separately. The loss patterns of fine particles and the evolutionary process of surface cracks on the slope are systematically analyzed. Continuous monitoring of pore water pressure, volumetric water content, and displacement field evolution elucidates the synergistic damage mechanism of cracking and erosion within the hydro-fluctuation zone, as well as their influence on slope deformation and failure. Results indicate that repeated wetting-drying cycles promote the progressive development and pseudo-healing of surface crack networks, whereas reciprocating seepage induces substantial loss of fine particles. Under the alternating combined action of both processes, desiccation cracks compromise soil integrity and create preferential seepage pathways, thereby accelerating fine particle loss. Conversely, seepage erosion exposes coarse skeletal particles, diminishes the capacity for crack healing, and enhances soil permeability. It can be inferred that desiccation crack and erosion interact mutually and exert a synergistic aggravating effect on soil structural degradation, thus promoting the earlier slope failure. This behavior is primarily attributed to the combined driving forces arising from severe soil structure deterioration and seepage pressure. The findings offer a theoretical foundation and technical support for understanding the intrinsic relationship between periodic water level fluctuations and progressive slope deformation, enabling more accurate analysis and prediction of slope stability.

Key words: drying-wetting cycle, seepage erosion, structural damage, shallow failure, physical model test

中图分类号: TV 697
[1] 王贺, 邓清洋, 程钰, 汪晓, 陈李洁. 酸性干湿循环下固化铅锌红黏土耐久及浸出性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 2966-2982.
[2] 胡江, 张妤涵, 李星, 鲁洋. 含原生裂隙膨胀土边坡水力响应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 2997-3008.
[3] 冯双喜, 卜天浩, 雷华阳, 邢道润, 张国庆, 李建楷. 真空预压-辐射式电渗方法处理污染淤泥脱水与重金属Cu剔除机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2653-2664.
[4] 奚旺, 赵勇, 冯世进, . 不同运行模式下能源桩桩土热响应长周期演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2697-2708.
[5] 曹一凡, 黄强兵, 余根荣, 余岱金, 朱媛媛, 于超. 降雨与堆载作用下堆积体滑坡失稳机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2748-2760.
[6] 孟宇涵, 郑秀坤, 王慧, 徐鹏, 李婷, 杨广庆, 张君, 刘林贵. 地震作用方向对多级加筋边坡水平加速度响应特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2360-2366.
[7] 李玉涛, 周汉, 李丽华, 李泽升, 刘瑛, 李林林. 土工合成材料加筋边坡抗水力冲刷特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2028-2040.
[8] 张景昱, 王文豪, 邓华锋, 李建林, 宛良朋, 李佳成, 刘盼, 钱信之. 应力-干湿循环联合作用下泥岩剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1961-1972.
[9] 杨瑞, 干飞, 王寿红, 郑刚, 李美霖, 王宏, 毕靖, 吴立城, 刘彪, 张元胤. 卸荷桩板挡墙力学性能及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1672-1685.
[10] 李世豪, 刘杰, 王锋, 雷兵兵, 王斌. 冻融循环下土工格室加筋土挡墙水热力响应机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1713-1727.
[11] 牛松荧, 邢晨卓, 冯世进, 谢伟, 陈宏信. 钙基/改性钙基膨润土-地聚合物隔离墙材料工程特性与干湿循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1481-1491.
[12] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[13] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[14] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[15] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!