岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2748-2760.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0802CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0802

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨与堆载作用下堆积体滑坡失稳机制模型试验研究

曹一凡1,黄强兵1, 2,余根荣1,余岱金1,朱媛媛1,于超3   

  1. 1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 长安大学 黄土科学全国重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054; 3. 中铁建大桥工程局集团第四工程有限公司,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150000
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-28 接受日期:2025-11-03 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 黄强兵,男,1972年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质工程、岩土与地下工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:hqb@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曹一凡,女,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地质工程方面的研究。E-mail:2023126091@chd.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2023YFC3008404);中国铁建大桥工程局集团有限公司委托项目(No. 220226240072)

Model test study on instability mechanism of accumulation landslide under rainfall and surcharge loading

CAO Yi-fan1, HUANG Qiang-bing1, 2, YU Gen-rong1, YU Dai-jin1, ZHU Yuan-yuan1, YU Chao3   

  1. 1. School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. China Railway Construction Bridge Engineering Bureau Group Fourth Engineering Co., Ltd., Harbin, Heilongjiang 150000, China
  • Received:2025-07-28 Accepted:2025-11-03 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3008404) and the China Railway Construction Bridge Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd. (220226240072).

摘要: 我国西南山区是滑坡灾害较为严重的地区,近些年来大规模交通基础设施建设加剧了滑坡灾害发生风险,其中开挖堆载与降雨作用是该地区滑坡产生的主要诱因之一,但降雨与堆载共同作用下堆积体滑坡失稳机制尚不清楚。以贵阳乌长高速卫城大型堆积体滑坡为原型,采用几何比尺1:150的物理模型试验,分析了降雨与分级堆载作用下堆积体滑坡内部含水率、土压力、孔隙水压力及坡体位移变化规律,揭示了滑坡变形失稳的物理机制。结果表明:分级堆载诱发堆载区滑体应力集中,土压力峰值较堆载前增长55.9%,沉降量呈阶梯状增长;堆载后降雨阶段土压力先短暂缓升后显著降低,最大降幅约93.7%,位移呈现先缓后急的增长趋势,浅层土体含水率及孔隙水压力随降雨呈现周期性波动。分级堆载与降雨作用下堆积体滑坡破坏模式为后部推移-前缘牵引,失稳过程大致分为初始稳定、坡脚冲蚀、逐级破坏3个阶段,其失稳机制为堆载引起滑坡后缘应力集中→降雨入渗导致孔隙水压力上升,有效应力降低→坡脚抗剪强度衰减,引发局部滑塌→应力重分布驱动裂缝逐步扩展并贯通,最终形成多级滑动面,引发滑坡逐级破坏。研究结果可为降雨堆载型松散堆积体滑坡灾害评价、工程设计与风险防控提供科学依据。

关键词: 堆积体滑坡, 降雨, 堆载, 物理模型试验, 失稳机制

Abstract: Landslide disasters frequently occur in the mountainous regions of Southwest China. In recent years, the extensive construction of transportation infrastructure has exacerbated risks associated with landslides. Excavation spoil accumulation and rainfall are primary triggers; however, the instability mechanism of accumulation landslides under rainfall and surcharge loading remains inadequately understood. Taking the Weicheng large-scale accumulation landslide along the Wu-Chang Expressway in Guiyang city as the prototype, this study conducted laboratory physical model tests with a geometric scale of 1:150 to investigate the water content, soil pressure, pore water pressure and displacement of the landslide under rainfall and surcharge loading, thereby revealing its deformation and instability mechanism. The results indicate that graded loading induces stress concentration beneath the loading zone, with the maximum increase in soil pressure reaching approximately 55.9%, and settlements exhibiting a stepwise incremental pattern. In the rainfall phase, soil pressure initially undergoes a slight increase followed by a significant decrease, with the maximum reduction recorded at 93.7%. Meanwhile displacement exhibits a growth trend that is initially sluggish but subsequently accelerates. Additionally, the water content and pore water pressure in shallow soils demonstrate fluctuations in response to rainfall cycles. The accumulation landslide exhibits a failure mode characterized by rearward pushing and front traction. Its instability process can be categorized into three distinct stages: initial stability, toe erosion, and progressive failure. The failure mechanism involves the following sequence: initially, loading induces stress concentration at the rear; subsequently, rainfall infiltration leads to an increase in pore water pressure and a reduction in effective stress; shear strength degradation at the slope toe then results in localized collapse; stress redistribution drives progressive crack propagation and coalescence, ultimately forming multi-level slip surfaces and triggering the progressive failure of the landslide. These findings offer a scientific foundation for hazard assessment, engineering optimization, and risk mitigation of loose accumulation landslides induced by the combined effects of rainfall and surcharge loading.

Key words: accumulation landslide, rainfall, surcharge loading, physical model test, instability mechanism

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 黄瑞瑞, 李文博, 李旭东, 崔皓东, 王金龙, 黄振伟, . 多降雨模式下卵漂石混合土边坡入渗特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2733-2747.
[2] 童小东, 张璇, 王思源. 降雨条件下土岩复合地层顺向边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1825-1836.
[3] 孙梦雅, 施斌, 刘瑾, 郑兴, 刘洁, 张博, 辛雨凌. 土体水分场主动加热型光纤法测管布设方式对测试结果影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1837-1846.
[4] 江文豪, 章一鸣, 李江山. 时变强降雨场景下填埋场土质覆盖层中水分入渗解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1513-1528.
[5] 王家辉, 江洎洧, 孙逸飞, 王培清, 王保田, 陈亮, 周钺, 李超. 泥浆介质饱和下松散堆积体抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1313-1322.
[6] 张京, 宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 张驿, 梅国雄. 自由应变下多级堆载预压联合电渗-真空排水径向固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1340-1350.
[7] 宋林辉, 张静轩, 郭易龙, 杨天娇, 李志明, 梅国雄. 裂隙岩层中的地铁车站基底孔压实测与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1364-1372.
[8] 蒋水华, 葛成民, 元志镕, 向晖, 胡伟, 黄发明. 基于等效渗透系数的多层土坡降雨入渗模型及可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1417-1430.
[9] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[10] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[11] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[12] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[13] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[14] 丁军领, 吉锋, 魏松, 张波, 曾瑞, 李卓, 陆宇鹏. 降雨及库水位作用下碎石土岸坡变形破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3740-3756.
[15] 杨昊天, 吴红刚, 韦洪, 赖国泉, 尹威江, . 降雨条件下三级桥基岸坡−BFRP锚杆体系的协同变形机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 267-276.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!