岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 383-401.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0829CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0829

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析

张国华1,相月1,张世殊2,王薪锦3,郭辉4,熊峰3,华东杰1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 深层地热富集机制与高效开发全国重点实验室 新能源学院,湖北 武汉 430074; 2. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 中国地质大学(武汉) 先进技术研究院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 接受日期:2025-12-11 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 华东杰,男,1995年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地下工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: huadongjie@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张国华,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: zhangguohua@cug.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.U24A20599,No.52409145)

Analysis of elastic-plastic deformation of surrounding rock mass throughout the whole operation process of the compressed air energy storage caverns

ZHANG Guo-hua1, XIANG Yue1, ZHANG Shi-shu2, WANG Xin-jin3, GUO Hui4, XIONG Feng3, HUA Dong-jie1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Deep Geothermal Resources, School of Sustainable Energy, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. Advanced Technology Research Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Accepted:2025-12-11 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20599, 52409145).

摘要: 围岩作为压缩空气储能地下储气库的主要承载结构,其在运行期间的应力与变形至关重要。然而,目前关于储气库围岩在长期循环膨胀动荷载作用下的弹塑性变形理论体系尚不完善,其从开挖至循环充放气全过程的应力路径尚不清晰。为此,基于储气库的受力特征,提出了从开挖到运行阶段围岩的弹塑性变形求解方法,并通过与商业软件FLAC3D数值模拟结果对比验证了其正确性。进一步,在设定计算方案下,从地质条件与运行条件两方面开展了围岩力学响应参数敏感性分析。主要结论如下:(1)阐明了储气库围岩不会发生持续向硐外扩容的机制,结果表明,在设定工况下围岩主要表现为向硐内的塑性累积变形,解决了长期困扰工程实践的储气库扩容问题;(2)揭示了从开挖至运行期间围岩应力路径始终位于高压与低压屈服线之间的变化规律;(3)建立了储气库围岩弹性运行压力区间的确定方法,该区间取决于黏聚力和内摩擦角,在此区间内运行可确保围岩处于弹性状态,不产生塑性变形,填补了储气库运行压力区间理论空白;(4)明确了围岩变形主要受最小与最大储气内压控制,同时充放气次数亦为重要影响因素。研究成果可为压缩空气储能电站的设计与建设提供理论依据。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 围岩, 应力路径, 扩容, 运行压力区间

Abstract: The surrounding rock mass serves as the primary load-bearing structure in underground CAES caverns, making its stress and deformation behaviour during the charging and discharging process critically significant. Nevertheless, the theoretical framework for elastoplastic deformation of the surrounding rock mass under long-term cyclic expansion dynamic loading remains poorly understood, and the stress paths of the whole process from excavation to cyclic charging and discharging operations are not clear. Accordingly, based on the stress characteristics of the CAES caverns, an analytical solution for elastoplastic deformation of surrounding rock mass throughout the excavation and operational phases is proposed in this study. The reliability of the proposed solution is verified by comparing with the numerical simulation results of commercial software FLAC3D. Furthermore, a parametric sensitivity analysis is conducted using a fixed computational scheme. The analysis evaluates how geological conditions and operational parameters influence the mechanical response of the surrounding rock mass. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The mechanism that surrounding rock mass will not continue to expand outward is clarified. Under the set working conditions, surrounding rock mass mainly exhibits plastic cumulative deformation inward, resolving the long-standing issue of CAES caverns expansion that has plagued engineering practice. (2) The evolution of the stress path in the surrounding rock mass from excavation through operation is revealed, and the stress path remains between the high- and low-pressure yield lines throughout this period. (3) A method for determining the elastic operating pressure range of the surrounding rock mass of the CAES caverns is developed. This range depends on cohesion and internal friction angle. Operating within this range ensures the surrounding rock mass remains in an elastic state without plastic deformation, thereby addressing a theoretical gap in CAES caverns operating pressure range theory. (4) It is clear that the deformation of surrounding rock mass is most significantly influenced by the minimum and maximum gas storage pressures, while the frequency of charging-discharging also plays an important role. These findings provide theoretical support for the design and construction of CAES power plants.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, surrounding rock mass, stress path, expansion, operating pressure range

中图分类号: TU 45
[1] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[2] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[3] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[4] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[5] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[6] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[8] 张强强, 张传庆, 崔强, 向天兵, 王超, 叶金萍, 朱训国. 软岩刚度条件下锚固系统受拉力学响应及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 581-594.
[9] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[10] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[11] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[12] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[13] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[14] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[15] 梁金平, 李小瑞, 荆浩勇, 侯公羽, 苏占东, 张明磊, . 厚壁圆筒围岩试件的屈服机制及卸荷变形破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2676-2686.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!