岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1621-1631.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0648CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0648

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

任意埋深下体外排水隧道渗流场解析解

黄娟,章驰,余俊   

  1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-21 接受日期:2025-12-27 出版日期:2026-05-11 发布日期:2026-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 余俊,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程、土–结构相互作用等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: jjyy1017@163.com
  • 作者简介:黄娟,女,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程施工力学和动力学方面的教学和研究。E-mail: 210057@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52478427)。

Analytical solution for seepage field in external drainage tunnels under arbitrary burial depths

HUANG Juan, ZHANG Chi, YU Jun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2025-06-21 Accepted:2025-12-27 Online:2026-05-11 Published:2026-05-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science of China (52478427).

摘要: 为研究体外排水隧道外水压力分布特征及影响规律,通过保角变换将半无限渗流区域映射为矩形区域,根据边界条件将其划分为4个子区域,基于分离变量法推导了任意埋深下考虑注浆圈作用的体外排水隧道渗流场解析解。将解析解计算的衬砌外水压力及排水量,与ABAQUS数值解、现有镜像法解进行对比,验证了解析解的正确性。进一步分析、讨论了注浆圈渗透系数等参数对体外排水方式降水压效果的影响规律,结果表明:体外排水方式可显著降低隧道仰拱处的水压力,但对拱顶、边墙区域的降压效果不明显;增大注浆圈渗透系数和排水洞半径可提升降压效果,但会导致排水量增加;不同隧道埋深下,该排水方式均可稳定、有效地降低隧道拱底处的水压力。研究结果为体外排水系统的设计与降水压效果评估提供理论支撑。

关键词: 体外排水, 任意埋深, 渗流场, 解析解, 水压力, 注浆圈, 隧道

Abstract: This study investigates the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of water pressure outside tunnel with external drainage. The semi-infinite seepage region is transformed into a rectangular area using conformal transformation and is divided into four sub-regions based on the boundary conditions. The analytical solution for the seepage field of the external drainage tunnel, accounting for the effect of the grouted circle at any burial depth, is derived using the method of separation of variables. The water pressure outside the lining and the drainage volume calculated from the analytical solution are compared with those obtained from the ABAQUS numerical solution and the existing mirror image method to validate the accuracy of the analytical solution. The influence of parameters, such as the permeability coefficient of the grouted circle, on the effectiveness of water pressure reduction using the extracorporeal drainage method is analyzed and discussed. The results indicate that the external drainage method significantly reduces water pressure at the tunnel invert; however, the pressure reduction effect on the arch and side wall areas is minimal. Increasing the permeability coefficient of the grouted circle and the radius of the drainage hole enhances the pressure reduction effect but also increases drainage volume. This drainage method reliably and effectively reduces water pressure at the tunnel crown across various burial depths. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for the design of drainage systems and the assessment of water pressure reduction effectiveness.

Key words: external drainage method, arbitrary burial depth, seepage field, analytical solution, water pressure, grouted circle, tunnel

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 金解放, 周璐, 钱豪, 刘希望, 陈萌, 廖强强, 熊慧颖, 阙海辉. 循环高水压对岩石超声波频域传播的影响特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1597-1608.
[2] 王宇轩, 杨建平, 曾志华, 叶苇, 陈卫忠, 尹利强. 盾构隧道防水密封垫材料超-黏弹性老化模型及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1323-1339.
[3] 张京, 宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 张驿, 梅国雄. 自由应变下多级堆载预压联合电渗-真空排水径向固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1340-1350.
[4] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[5] 何本国, 王彪, 冯夏庭, 王杰. 深埋隧道隧道掘进机振动特性及围岩动力扰动破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 1007-1021.
[6] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] 吴奎, 王子岩, 徐晨, 杨跃宗, 赵南南. 缓冲层影响下软岩大变形隧道时效力学行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 183-197.
[8] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[9] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[10] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[11] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[12] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[13] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[14] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[15] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!