›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1877-1884.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1467

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑起始坡降双层地基的大应变非线性固结

李传勋1,董兴泉1,金丹丹1,王玉林2   

  1. 1.江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2. 武夷学院 土木工程与建筑学院,福建 武夷山 354300
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-10 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 作者简介:李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51109092);江苏省青年基金项目(No. BK20150512)。

Large-strain nonlinear consolidation of double-layered soft clay with threshold gradient

LI Chuan-xun1, DONG Xing-quan1, JIN Dan-dan1, WANG Yu-lin2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China
  • Received:2016-06-10 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51109092) and the Science Foundation for Youths of Jiangsu Province, China(BK20150512).

摘要: 天然软土成层分布特性及土中渗流存在起始水力坡降的现象已被人们熟知。但变荷载下能同时考虑黏土中起始水力坡降、软土非线性压缩渗透特性及大应变特性的双层地基固结理论还鲜见报道。在拉格朗日坐标系中建立以超静孔压为变量的双层软土地基大应变非线性固结模型并给出其有限差分解。通过与考虑起始水力坡降的单层地基大应变非线性固结数值计算结果对比,验证了差分解的可靠性。着重分析了上、下土层起始坡降无量纲参数R1、R2对双层地基固结性状的影响,分析在大应变与小应变假定下双层地基超静孔压消散及固结沉降变形的异同。结果表明:上层土无量纲参数R1对双层地基固结性状的影响程度较下层土无量纲参数R2显著;大应变假定下双层地基渗流前锋的下移速度要快于小应变假定下的移动速度;大应变假定下考虑起始水力坡降的双层软土地基超静孔压消散速率要比小应变假定下快,且大应变假定下考虑起始水力坡降的双层地基最终沉降量要比小应变假定下大。

关键词: 双层地基, 起始水力坡降, 大变形固结, 非线性固结, 有限差分

Abstract: Layered distribution of natural soft soils and the threshold gradient of the flow in soils have been gradually recognized. However, with consideration of the threshold hydraulic gradient and the nonlinear compressibility and permeability, the theory of large-strain consolidation of double-layered soil has rarely been reported in the literature so far. In this study, a model for large-strain nonlinear consolidation of double-layered soil is developed in Lagrangian coordinate by employing the excess pore water pressure as a variable. Meanwhile the corresponding finite difference solution for this model are provided. The numerical solution for the proposed model is verified by comparing with the numerical solution of large-strain nonlinear consolidation of a single-layered soil with threshold gradient. Finally, the influences of dimensionless parameters R1, R2 on consolidation behaviors are analyzed. The differences of the dissipation of excess pore water pressure, and the differences of the consolidation settlement under large- and small-strain conditions are investigated. The results show that the influences of R1 on consolidation behavior of double-layered soil are more evident than that of R2; the moving speed of seepage flow front of double-layer soiled under large-strain assumption is faster than that under small-strain assumption; the dissipation rate of excess pore pressure under large-strain assumption is faster than that under small-strain assumption, and the settlements of double-layered soil with threshold gradient under large-strain assumption is larger than that under small-strain assumption.

Key words: double-layer foundation, threshold gradient, large-strain consolidation, nonlinear consolidation, finite difference method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 433

[1] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[2] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[3] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[4] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[5] 陈栋, 王恩元, 李楠, . 不同煤岩介质模型的波场特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 449-458.
[6] 刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的 一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[7] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[8] 金丹丹, 王 素, 李传勋. 考虑起始水力坡降的天然非均质地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1433-1440.
[9] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[10] 刘成禹,郑智享,. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[11] 黄生根,刘东军,胡永健,. 电磁波CT技术探测溶洞的模拟分析与应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 544-550.
[12] 夏长青,胡安峰,崔 军,吕文晓,谢康和, . 饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.
[13] 李传勋,王 素. 软土一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3548-3554.
[14] 李传勋,董兴泉,金丹丹,谢康和,. 考虑起始水力坡降的软土大变形非线性固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 377-384.
[15] 李传勋,徐 超,谢康和,. 考虑非达西渗流和应力历史的土体非线性固结研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 91-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!