›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2651-2661.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2368

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏土地基中能量桩力学特性数值分析

费 康1, 2,钱 健1,洪 伟1,刘汉龙2   

  1. 1. 扬州大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 扬州 225127;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-10 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
  • 作者简介:费康,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基基础工程研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51778557,No. 51378178);江苏省“青蓝工程”资助项目(苏教师[2016]15号)。

Numerical analysis of mechanical behavior of energy piles in clay

FEI Kang1,2, QIAN Jian1, HONG Wei1, LIU Han-long2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127, China 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2016-10-10 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778557, 51378178) and the Qing-Lan Project by the Jiangsu Province Government (20160512).

摘要: 能量桩是将地源热泵系统中的换热管埋置在桩体内部,桩同时起到承载和换热的作用,是一种新型的基础型式。为了合理分析黏土地基中能量桩的力学特性,需要了解能量桩运行过程中桩和地基土的温度响应,并考虑温度变化对土体力学性能的影响。基于有限元软件ABAQUS建立了能量桩传热分析三维有限元模型,把能量桩的传热简化为换热管内液体与管壁之间的对流传热、桩体中的热传导和地基中的热传导,将计算结果与常规理论和实测数据进行了对比验证。对热力耦合边界面本构模型进行了二次开发,通过算例验证了模型对土体压缩和剪切性状温度效应的模拟能力。利用所提出的能量桩传热分析方法和热边界面模型,考虑不同的桩顶工作荷载水平,对正常固结黏土地基中能量桩单桩的长期性能进行了研究,分析了温度循环对桩顶沉降、桩侧摩阻力和桩身轴力的影响。结果表明,工作荷载越高,温度循环次数越多,桩顶累积沉降越大。

关键词: 能量桩, 黏土, 循环温度荷载, 热塑性, 力学特性

Abstract: Energy piles are piles equipped with heat exchange pipes through which a heat-carrying fluid circulates and exchanges heat with the ground. This technology couples the structural role of classical pile foundations with heat exchangers for energy supply. In order to analyze the bearing characteristics of energy piles in clay, it is necessary to determine the temperature response of the pile and the ground, so as to investigate the effects of temperature on mechanical behavior of the soil. With the use of the finite element software ABAQUS, a numerical approach has been developed to evaluate the thermal response. In this method, the heat transfer process is simplified as the thermal convection between the fluid and the pipe wall, the thermal conduction in the pile, and thermal conduction in the ground. Validation of the proposed method is carried out by comparing the computed results with the theoretical solutions and data from literature. A thermo-bounding surface model is implemented into ABAQUS. The ability of the model to describe the temperature effects on mechanical behavior of clays is verified by several examples. Based on the numerical heat transfer method and the implemented constitutive model, the long-term performance of a free-head energy pile in normally consolidated clay is analyzed. In the analysis, three different load levels are considered. The effects of the seasonally cyclic thermal loading on pile settlement, shaft friction, and axial force are studied in detail.

Key words: energy pile, clay, cyclic thermal loading, thermo-plasticity, mechanical behavior

中图分类号: 

  • TU 442

[1] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[2] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[3] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[4] 谈云志, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰钝化红黏土水敏性的机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2207-2214.
[5] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[6] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[7] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[8] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[9] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[10] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[11] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[12] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[13] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[14] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[15] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!