岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4651-4658.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0735

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

纵向非一致地震激励下管-土结构响应的 简化分析模型

韩俊艳,杜修力,侯本伟,李立云,钟紫蓝,赵 密   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京100124
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-18 出版日期:2018-12-11 发布日期:2019-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 杜修力,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事结构抗震方面的研究工作。E-mail: duxl@iwhr.com E-mail:hjy168kk@163.com
  • 作者简介:韩俊艳,女,1983年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下结构抗震方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(No.51421005);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2015CB057902);国家青年科学基金项目(No.51508528,No.51508013);北京市青年科学基金项目(No.8184062)。

A simplified analysis model for pipe-soil structural seismic responses under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations

HAN Jun-yan, DU Xiu-li, HOU Ben-wei, LI Li-yun, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124,China   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124,China
  • Received:2017-04-18 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2019-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51421005), the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China(973 program)(2015CB057902), the National Youth Science Foundation of China(51508528, 51508013) and the Beijing Youth Science Foundation (8184062).

摘要: 将长输埋地管道化为多自由度体系的等效离散集中质量模型,建立了集中质量模型在管道纵向荷载作用下的结构响应计算模型。模型考虑了沿管道长度方向的行波效应,实现了不同质量点处地震动的非一致输入,为考虑管-土相互滑移的影响,模型中考虑了土体的弹塑性本构关系。模型以纵向地震动位移输入,求解得到管道各集中质量点的位移和管-土间的相对位移,在此基础上运用结构力学方法对每两个集中质量点间管道进行精细分析,进而求得管道的内力和变形。通过算例分析,集中质量模型程序计算结果与连续型管道的有限元分析结果进行比较,验证了集中质量模型方法的有效性和合理性。

关键词: 长输埋地管道, 集中质量模型, 地震动非一致输入

Abstract: The equivalent discrete lumped mass model with multi-degree of freedom for the long-distance buried pipeline is proposed in this paper to evaluate the longitudinal dynamic of the pipeline. The proposed model is able to use the non-uniform excitation as the inputs by considering the traveling wave effect along the longitudinal direction of the pipeline. Moreover, the ideal elasto-plastic constitutive relation of the soil-spring model is used to simulate the slip effect between the pipe and the soil under seismic loading. Based on the longitudinal seismic displacement input, the displacements of the lumped-mass point and the relative displacement between pipe and soil can be obtained. Moreover, the internal force and deformation of the pipeline can be obtained by analyzing the force-displacement relation between every two lumped-mass points with the structural mechanics method. Finally, the accuracy and the efficiency of the proposed method is validated by comparing with the finite element analysis results of the continuous pipeline.

Key words: long-distance buried pipeline, lumped-mass model, the ground motion non-uniform input

中图分类号: 

  • TU 433
[1] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[2] 沈 扬, 沈 雪, 俞演名, 刘汉龙, 葛华阳, 芮笑曦, . 粒组含量对钙质砂压缩变形特性影响的宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3733-3740.
[3] 刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
[4] 黄晓虎, 雷德鑫, 夏俊宝, 易武, 张鹏, . 降雨诱发滑坡阶跃型变形的预测分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3585-3592.
[5] 李悄, 孟繁增, 牛远志. 压重顶进框构下穿高铁引起桥墩变形及控制技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3618-3624.
[6] 李传勋,王 素. 软土一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3548-3554.
[7] 裴强强,王旭东,郭青林,张 博,赵国靖,赵建忠, . 干旱环境下土遗址夯补支顶加固变形机制室内试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2755-2764.
[8] 徐 鹏,蒋关鲁,邱俊杰,林展展,王智猛,. 基于二楔块法的加筋土挡墙屈服加速度及破坏模式极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
[9] 任连伟,周桂林,顿志林,何停印,杨权威,张敏霞,. 采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2922-2932.
[10] 杨建民,霍王文,. 渗透性水平向各向异性导致椭圆形地面沉降漏斗的一个性质[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2960-2976.
[11] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[12] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[13] 姚志华,连 杰,陈正汉,朱元青,方祥位,. 考虑细观结构演化的非饱和Q3 原状黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1553-1563.
[14] 张小艳,张立翔,李 泽,. 基于塑性极限分析上限法理论的土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1840-1849.
[15] 李传勋,董兴泉,金丹丹,王玉林,. 考虑起始坡降双层地基的大应变非线性固结[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1877-1884.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!