岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 4907-4915.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1983

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析

冯凌云1, 2,朱斌1, 2,代加林1, 2,孔德琼1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-26 出版日期:2019-12-11 发布日期:2020-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 孔德琼,男,1986年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事海洋岩土工程及大变形数值模拟等方面的研究。 E-mail: deqiong_kong@zju.edu.cn E-mail: fenglingyun@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:冯凌云,女,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51809232,No.51679211)。

Modelling lateral pipe-soil interaction on soft clay using large displacement sequential limit analysis

FENG Ling-yun1, 2, ZHU Bin1, 2, DAI Jia-lin1, 2, KONG De-qiong1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2018-10-26 Online:2019-12-11 Published:2020-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51809232, 51679211).

摘要: 管道被广泛应用于油气产业,其中管?土相互作用机制是管道可控屈曲设计的关键。采用新开发的连续极限分析(SLA)方法对深海管道与软土水平大变形相互作用进行了研究。该方法基于极限分析对变形体进行一系列求解与更新模型,能够考虑模型的极端几何变形和材料的应变软化与率效应。该研究对固定管道竖向位移条件下水平加载这一工况进行了探讨,分析了不同初始埋深的管道在位移过程中所受竖向及水平向反力(V、H)的发展。通过与多组离心机试验数据对比,验证了SLA对管?土水平大变形相互作用研究的有效性和高计算效率。主要成果有:提取了管道在不同位置的V-H屈服包络面以考虑加载路径变化对管道受力行为的影响,发现了管道的等效摩擦系数H/V随水平位移的线性增加规律。该研究以期为深海管道的可控屈曲设计提供参考,并推广SLA法在大变形土结相互作用问题中的应用。

关键词: 软黏土, 深海管道, 管?土相互作用, 极限分析, 屈服包络面

Abstract: Pipelines are widely used in the petroleum industry for oil and gas transportation, and the interaction between pipelines and seabed is crucial for assessing pipeline behavior during lateral thermal buckling. This paper presents a numerical investigation on the pipe-soil interaction behaviour using a recently developed sequential limit analysis approach for deep-water pipelines on soft clay. This approach, primarily based on upper-bound limit analysis, is capable of handling the extremely large deformation problems and implementing the strain softening and strain rate effects. During the analysis, the pipe was laterally driven forward with the elevation of its invert fixed, differing from existing work in which the pipe can dive or rebound during the lateral displacement. The evolution of vertical (V) and horizontal (H) soil resistance was examined, and the validity of the present model is demonstrated using comparisons with centrifuge data. V-H yield envelopes were derived during the analysis to investigate the influence of load path on pipe response. The equivalent friction ratio, H/V, was found to increase linearly with lateral displacement. This study aims to provide guidance for the controlled buckling design for deep-water pipelines, and show the potential of SLA in solving large displacement soil-structure problems in undrained clay.

Key words: clay, deep-water pipelines, pipe-soil interaction, limit analysis, yield envelope

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[2] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[3] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[4] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[5] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[6] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[7] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[8] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[9] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[10] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[11] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[12] 罗庆姿, 陈晓平, 袁炳祥, 冯德銮, . 柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[13] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[14] 雷华阳, 刘广学, 周 骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[15] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!