岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 943-953.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0751

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于气体运移规律的增压式真空预压法 加固机制分析

雷华阳1, 2,王鹏1,刘旭1,王磊1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-01 修回日期:2020-11-12 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 作者简介:雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51890911);天津市建委科技项目(No. 17310)

Influence of gas migration patterns on reinforcement of dredged slurry by air-booster vacuum preloading method

LEI Hua-yang1, 2, WANG Peng1, LIU Xu1, WANG Lei1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2020-05-01 Revised:2020-11-12 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51890911) and the Science and Technology Project of Tianjin Construction Committee (17310).

摘要: 针对天津地区高含水率的吹填淤泥,进行不同增压深度的室内增压式真空预压模型试验,结合土中气体运移规律,进行增压机制及加固效果影响因素分析。研究结果表明,采用注气增压方法可以有效加固高含水率吹填淤泥,其中排水板中下部注气增压对土体排水量、沉降量、超静孔隙水压力累积消散量以及十字板强度提升有明显促进作用。加固初期,流塑状态的土体中,注入气体易形成气泡并在浮力作用下快速上升运移,带动深部土颗粒向上运动,形成类似搅拌的扰动,使土体均匀加固;随着土体含水率逐渐降低,气体在土体内部赋存形式以具有一定气压的封闭空间为主,使得注气管与排水板之间的压力差增大;加固后期,注入气体发生断裂形式扩张,导致土体形成微劈裂裂缝,加速土中水的排出,提高了加固效果。

关键词: 增压式真空预压法, 气体运移, 吹填淤泥, 加固机制, 增压深度

Abstract: In this study, laboratory tests of the air-booster vacuum preloading method with different air-boosting depths were performed on the Tianjin dredged slurry of high water content. The law of gas migration in soil was used to analyze the reinforcement mechanism and the reinforcement factors. Test results show that the drainage, settlement, dissipation of excess pore water pressure as well as the vane shear strength were significantly improved when air boosting is operated on the lower part of drainage board. In the initial stage of consolidation of the fluid-plastic soil, the injected gas is easy to form bubbles and to move upwards rapidly under the action of buoyancy, which drives the deep soil particles to move upwards and disturbs the soil like stirring, so that the dredged slurry was reinforced more uniformly; while as water content of the dredged slurry gradually decreased, the gas in soil would form a closed space with a certain pressure, leading to increased pressure between the plastic vertical drain and the gas injection pipe; in the later stage of consolidation, the gas expanded in soil, which forms micro-fracture cracks to accelerate the water dissipation in the soil and improves the drainage reinforcement effect.

Key words: air-booster vacuum preloading, gas migration, dredged slurry, reinforcement mechanism, different boosting depths

中图分类号: 

  • TU 442
[1] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 裴强强, 汪小海, 许鹏飞, . 注浆模式对土遗址裂隙修复浆−土界面 黏结性能影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1501-1511.
[2] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[3] 史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压 实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[4] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[5] 沙飞, 李术才, 林春金, 刘人太, 张庆松, 杨磊, 李召峰. 砂土介质注浆渗透扩散试验与加固机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4259-4269.
[6] 张妹珠,江 权,王雪亮,冯夏庭,钟 山,刘 畅, . 破裂大理岩锚注加固试样的三轴压缩试验及加固机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3651-3660.
[7] 贺智强,樊恒辉,王军强,刘 刚,王中妮,余佳辉,. 木质素加固黄土的工程性能试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 731-739.
[8] 鲍树峰,董志良 ,莫海鸿 ,武冬青,. 高黏粒含量新吹填淤泥加固新技术室内研发[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 61-67.
[9] 鲍树峰 ,莫海鸿 ,董志良 ,陈平山 ,邱青长,. 新近吹填淤泥地基负压传递特性及分布模式研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3569-3576.
[10] 王 秒,李海波,刘亚群,张 伟,黄晓程. 顺层岩质边坡预应力锚索抗震加固机制研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3555-3560.
[11] 董志良,周 琦,张功新,邱青长,罗 彦,李 燕. 天津滨海新区浅层超软土加固技术现场对比试验[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1306-1312.
[12] 王宏祥,闫澍旺,冯守中. 强夯置换墩法处理公路软基的机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3753-3758.
[13] 贺若兰 ,李 宁 ,张 平 . 土钉支护结构破坏模式和加固机制分析[J]. , 2008, 29(1): 197-202.
[14] 宋雅坤, 郑颖人 ,雷文杰,. 沉埋式抗滑桩机制模型试验数值分析研究[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 63-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[2] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[3] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[4] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[5] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[6] 李 健 ,谭忠盛 ,喻 渝 ,倪鲁肃. 下穿高速公路浅埋大跨度黄土隧道施工措施研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2803 -2809 .
[7] 应宏伟 ,郑贝贝 ,谢新宇. 狭窄基坑平动模式刚性挡墙被动土压力分析[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3755 -3762 .
[8] 李 男 ,徐 辉 ,胡 斌. 干燥与饱水状态下砂岩的剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 439 -443 .
[9] 刘振平,贺怀建,白世伟,张 华,邹 丹,李火兵. 软基中500 kV输电桩板塔基现场试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1031 -1039 .
[10] 丁洲祥,仇玉良,李 涛. 双面排水非线性固结超静孔压的非对称性解析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1829 -1838 .