岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1210-1220.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1091

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于能量耗散理论的岩石塑性-损伤本构模型

马秋峰1,刘志河1,秦跃平2,田静3,王树立1   

  1. 1. 山东理工大学 资源与环境工程学院,山东 淄博 255000;2中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 淄矿大学 机械工程系,山东 淄博 255120
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27 修回日期:2021-01-06 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-03
  • 作者简介:马秋峰,男,1990年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与数值计算方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No. 51904177);国家自然科学基金(No. 50904071)

Rock plastic-damage constitutive model based on energy dissipation

MA Qiu-feng1, LIU Zhi-he1, QIN Yue-ping2, TIAN Jing3, WANG Shu-li1   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255000, China; 2. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Zikuang University, 255120, Zibo, Shandong 255120, China
  • Received:2020-07-27 Revised:2021-01-06 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Youth Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904177) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50904071).

摘要: 将Mohr-Coulomb准则与能量耗散理论相结合,考虑了加载过程中岩石的硬化、软化特性,采用非关联塑性流动法则描述岩石的塑性变形,通过损伤过程中耗散能与损伤耗能率相除的方法求解损伤变量,建立了损伤-塑性本构模型。通过常规三轴加-卸载试验,分析了岩石损伤过程中耗散能-损伤变量的关系,建立了损伤耗能率表达式,同时标定了模型参数。利用所提的新模型模拟岩石的常规三轴试验,将模拟结果与试验结果进行对比,探究了模型的合理性。在此过程中得到如下结论: (1)损伤耗散能在线弹性阶段随着轴向应变的增长,呈现上凹型曲线,增长速率不断增大,在应力峰值附近增长速率达到最大值,在峰后残余阶段,损伤耗散能与轴向应变近似呈现线性关系;(2)采用与弹性模量相关联的损伤变量定义方法,试验结果表明,存在一个小于或等于1的损伤变量极限,随着围压的增大,损伤变量极限逐渐减小;(3)所提的新模型能够反映出在加载过程中不同围压条件下岩石的强度、硬-软化特性,数值模拟结果能够描述应力-应变关系、损伤耗散能规律以及损伤演化规律。

关键词: 损伤, 能量耗散, Mohr-Coulomb准则, 本构模型, 损伤耗能率

Abstract: In this paper, the dissipative energy in the damage process was employed to solve the damage variable while the damage constitutive model was established. In this model, the Mohr-Coulomb criterion and the energy dissipation theory were introduced. Considering the hardening and softening characteristics of rock during loading, the non-associated plastic flow rule was applied to describe the plastic deformation of rock, and the damage variable was calculated by quoting the dissipation energy and damage energy dissipation rate in the damage process. Based on the conventional triaxial loading-unloading experiments, the energy consumption and damage evolution law of rock was analyzed. The expression of damage energy dissipation rate was established, and the parameters in the model were calibrated. Simulation was conducted by this model and the simulation results were compared with the experimental results to validate the model. In this process, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) in the elastic stage, the damage dissipation energy increases slowly with the axial strain, showing an upward concave curve, and the growth rate reaches the maximum near the peak-stress. In the residual stage, the relationship between damage dissipation energy and axial strain is linear; (2) based on elastic modulus associated damage definition, the experimental results show that there is a damage variable limit less than 1, and the damage variable limit gradually decreases with the increase of confining pressure; (3) the model in this paper can be used to investigate the strength, hardening, softening characteristics and strain law of rock under different confining pressures during the loading process. The numerical simulation results can describe the stress-strain relationship and damage evolution law of rock.

Key words: damage, energy dissipation, Mohr-Coulomb criterion, constitutive model, damage energy dissipation rate

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 张超, 杨楚卿, 白允. 岩石类脆性材料损伤演化分析及其模型方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2344-2354.
[2] 陈洲泉, 陈湘生, 庞小朝, . 砂土临界状态模型的隐式积分算法 在有限元分析中实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2279-2286.
[3] 蒋浩鹏, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣. 基于Weibull分布的高温岩石统计损伤 本构模型及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1894-1902.
[4] 贾蓬, 杨其要, 刘冬桥, 王述红, 赵永, . 高温花岗岩水冷却后物理力学特性及微观破裂特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1568-1578.
[5] 李欣慰, 姚直书, 黄献文, 刘之喜, 赵翔, 穆克汉, . 循环加卸载下砂岩变形破坏特征与能量演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1693-1704.
[6] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[7] 刘新荣, 许彬, 周小涵, 谢应坤, 何春梅, 黄俊辉, . 软弱层峰前循环剪切宏细观累积损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1291-1303.
[8] 刘杰, 张瀚, 王瑞红, 王芳, 何卓文, . 冻融循环作用下砂岩层进式损伤劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1381-1394.
[9] 赵奎, 冉珊瑚, 曾鹏, 杨道学, 腾天野, . 含水率对红砂岩特征应力及声发射特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 899-908.
[10] 余莉, 彭海旺, 李国伟, 张钰, 韩子豪, 祝瀚政. 花岗岩高温−水冷循环作用下的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1025-1035.
[11] 时振昊, 黄茂松, 倪雨萍, . 基于颗粒间应变的饱和黏土小应变各向异性 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1036-1044.
[12] 熊仲明, 吕世鸿, 李运良, 赵奇峰, 李进, 谭书舜, 张向荣, 朱玉荣, 姜磊, 杨琪凡, 张宁波, 张子栋. 被动围压下黄土动态力学性能与能量耗散研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 775-782.
[13] 李波波, 王忠晖, 任崇鸿, 张尧, 许江, 李建华, . 水-力耦合下煤岩力学特性及损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 315-323.
[14] 邓华锋, 方景成, 李建林, 李冠野, 齐豫, 许晓亮. 水-岩和循环加卸载次序作用下 砂岩动力特性损伤演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 343-351.
[15] 梁文鹏, 周家作, 陈盼, 韦昌富, . 基于均匀化理论的含水合物土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 481-490.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 樊恒辉,高建恩,吴普特,娄宗科. 水泥基土壤固化剂固化土的物理化学作用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3741 -3745 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[6] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[7] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .
[8] 席人双,陈从新,肖国锋,黄平路. 结构面对程潮铁矿东区地表及岩体移动变形的影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 532 -538 .
[9] 李 萍,黄丽娟,李振江,李新生,李同录. 甘肃黄土高边坡可靠度研究[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 811 -817 .
[10] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .