岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 127-138.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0711

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于边界位移法的地下结构推覆试验可行性研究

徐琨鹏1,景立平1, 2,程新俊3,梁海安3,宾佳4   

  1. 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;2. 防灾科技学院,河北 廊坊 065201; 3. 东华理工大学 土木与建筑工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;4. 湖南工业大学 土木工程学院,湖南 株洲 412000
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-11 修回日期:2021-09-08 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 景立平,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事岩土地震工程领域的研究。E-mail: jlp_iem@163.com E-mail:iem_xkp@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐琨鹏,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下结构抗震领域的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No. 2017B10);国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0800205);国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(No. 52008081)

Feasibility study of pushover test of underground structure based on boundary displacement method

XU Kun-peng1, JING Li-ping1, 2, CHENG Xin-jun3, LIANG Hai-an3, BIN Jia4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 2. Institute of Disaster Prevention, Langfang, Hebei 065201, China; 3. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 4. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan 412000, China
  • Received:2021-05-11 Revised:2021-09-08 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2017B10), the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0800205) and the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (52008081).

摘要: 地震过程中地下结构变形主要受周边土体变形控制。基于该思想,现已提出一种在土?结构有限元模型侧边施加土体变形的地下结构抗震简化分析方法——边界位移法,但缺乏相关试验研究。为探索土体侧边施加推覆位移的试验方法可行性,以自行研制的岩土综合试验模型箱为试验平台,以1:10缩尺的大开车站区间隧道为研究对象,开展了大型土?地下结构系统推覆试验。通过应变、位移和应力的分析,揭示了试验过程中地下结构及周边土体的反应特性。结果表明:由于土体材料的强非线性特征,土体侧边施加的倒三角形变形在传递过程中会产生衰减,地下结构受到剪切变形和挤压变形的耦合作用;中柱与底板交接处是整体结构中的抗震薄弱位置;水平基床系数与土层位移水平及结构侧壁的破坏阶段相关;结构整体刚度大于等代土体,两者的侧向变形比值小于1。随着推覆水平增加比值逐渐增大,通过变形特征能够量化土?结构相互作用,有效填补了土?结构相互作用系数试验研究的空白。试验方法与结论,对地下结构抗震分析及推覆试验可行性研究具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 地下结构, 抗震性能, 推覆试验, 边界位移法, 土?结构相互作用

Abstract: The deformation of underground structure during earthquake is mainly controlled by the deformation of surrounding soil. Based on this idea, a simplified seismic analytical method, namely the boundary displacement method, was proposed for underground structure by applying soil deformation to the lateral boundary of soil-structure finite element model, while there is a lack of relevant experimental research. To explore the feasibility of the test method of applying pushover displacement to soil lateral boundary, a large-scale pushover test of soil-underground structure system was carried out taking the self-developed geotechnical comprehensive test model box as the test platform and the 1:10 scale Dakai station section tunnel as the research object. Response characteristics of underground structure and surrounding soil in the process of test were revealed based on the analyses of the strain, displacement, and stress. The results show that due to the strong nonlinear characteristics of soil materials, the inverted triangle deformation applied on the side of soil will attenuate in the transmission process, and the underground structure is subject to the coupling effect of shear deformation and extrusion deformation. The junction between central column and bottom plate is the seismic weak region in the whole structure. Horizontal coefficient of subgrade reaction is related to the level of soil displacement and the failure stage of structural side wall. The integral stiffness of structure is greater than that of the equivalent soil, and the ratio of lateral deformation between structure and soil is less than 1, which gradually increased with the increase of the pushing level. The soil-structure interaction could be quantified through deformation characteristic, which effectively fills the gap in the experimental study of soil structure interaction coefficient. The test method and conclusions have important guiding significance for seismic analysis of underground structure and feasibility study of pushover test.

Key words: underground structure, seismic performance, pushover test, boundary displacement method, soil-structure interaction

中图分类号: 

  • TU 92
[1] 赵爽, 余俊, 刘新源, 胡钟伟. 悬臂式刚性墙动力响应解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 152-159.
[2] 韩润波, 许成顺, 杜修力, 许紫刚, . 土-地下结构体系拟静力推覆试验 模型箱类型的优选[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 462-470.
[3] 汪云龙, 王进, 袁晓铭, 马佳钧, . 管状地下结构对软土场地浅埋筏式基础震陷影响规律模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3485-3496.
[4] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[5] 禹海涛, 张正伟, 李 攀, . 地下结构抗震设计的改进等效反应加速度法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2401-2410.
[6] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[7] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[8] 骆冠勇, 马铭骏, 曹洪, 潘泓, . 临江地下结构主被动联合抗浮方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3730-3739.
[9] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[10] 许紫刚, 杜修力, 许成顺, 韩润波, 乔磊. 复杂断面地下结构地震反应分析的 广义反应位移法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3247-3254.
[11] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[12] 许紫刚, 杜修力, 许成顺, 张驰宇, 蒋家卫. 地下结构地震反应分析中场地瑞利阻尼 构建方法比较研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4838-4847.
[13] 宋林辉,王宇豪,付 磊,梅国雄,. 软黏土中地下结构浮力测试试验与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 753-758.
[14] 曹 洪,朱东风,骆冠勇,潘 泓, . 临江地下结构抗浮计算方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2973-2979.
[15] 刘仰鹏,贺少辉,汪大海,李丹煜. 超大跨度深埋地下结构围岩压力计算研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 118-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .