岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 769-776.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0895

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

洗砂泥浆压滤脱水性能及快速检测方法

詹良通1, 2,尹昭宇1, 2,陈萍3,王顺玉1, 2,陈为武4,蒋建良5,管仁秋5   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058;3. 浙江理工大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州310018;4. 深圳市华威环保建材有限公司,广东 深圳 518000;5. 浙江省工程勘察设计院集团有限公司,浙江 宁波 315012
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-15 修回日期:2021-12-17 出版日期:2022-03-22 发布日期:2022-03-22
  • 作者简介:詹良通,男,1972年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土力学与环境岩土工程的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省重点研发计划项目(No.2019C03107)

Pressure filtration dewatering performance of sand-washing slurry and rapid test method

ZHAN Liang-tong1, 2, YIN Zhao-yu1, 2, CHEN Ping3, WANG Shun-yu1, 2, CHEN Wei-wu4, JIANG Jian-liang5, GUAN Ren-qiu5   

  1. 1. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China; 4. Shenzhen Huawei Green Building Material Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China; 5. Zhejiang Engineering Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315012, China
  • Received:2021-06-15 Revised:2021-12-17 Online:2022-03-22 Published:2022-03-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Key Research and Development program of Zhejiang Province (2019C03107).

摘要: 工程渣土在水洗砂过程中产生的洗砂泥浆存在脱水效果差、不稳定的问题,这与泥浆的脱水性能密切相关。通过模拟现场洗砂工艺获得不同脱水性能的洗砂泥浆,开展了改进滤失试验及模拟压滤试验,研究了洗砂泥浆脱水性能受洗砂工艺的影响规律,获得了一种能够快速表征泥浆脱水性能的指标,用以指导优化渣土洗砂工艺。结果表明:洗砂泥浆脱水性能受洗砂粒径和加水量影响明显,滤失量及渗透系数与脱水性能有较好的相关关系;而30 min滤失量与最终滤失量、最终泥饼含水率呈现较好的相关性,能够较准确地反映泥浆脱水性能;经模拟压滤试验进一步验证,30 min滤失量可以作为洗砂泥浆脱水性能的快速表征指标。基于此提出了一套洗砂泥浆脱水性能的快速检测及工程渣土洗砂工艺优化方法,能够及时为洗砂工艺参数调整提供指导,以获得脱水性能较优的洗砂泥浆,最终使脱水效果得以改善和稳定。

关键词: 洗砂泥浆, 压滤试验, 泥饼, 滤失量, 脱水性能

Abstract: The slurry produced by sand-washing engineering of excavated soil has the problems of poor dewatering property and instability, which are closely related to the dewatering performance of slurry. In this study, sand-washing slurry samples with different dewatering performances were obtained by simulating the field sand-washing process, then the modified filtration loss test and simulated pressure filtration test were carried out to study the influence of sand-washing process on the dewatering performance of sand-washing slurries, so as to find an index for rapid characterization of the dewatering performance of slurries, which can be used to guide the optimization of the sand-washing process. The results show that the dewatering performance of sand-washing slurry was significantly affected by the mesh size and the amount of water added. The filtration loss and hydraulic conductivity indicated a good correlation with the dewatering performance. In particular, the filtration loss at 30 minutes was nicely correlated with the final filtration loss and the final water content of filter cake, which can accurately reflect the dewatering performance. The results of simulated pressure filtration test further verify that the filtration loss at 30 minutes can be used as an index to quickly characterize the dewatering performance of slurries. Based on the above results, a method is put forward for rapid detection of sand-washing slurry dewatering and optimization of field sand-washing process. The method can provide guidance for the adjustment of sand-washing process parameters in time to obtain the sand-washing slurry with better dewatering performance, which can effectively improve and stabilize the dewatering effect.

Key words: sand-washing slurry, filter test, filter cake, filtration loss, dewatering performance

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 张虎元, 王赵明, 朱江鸿, 周光平, . 混合型缓冲材料砌块渗透性及其各向异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 573-581.
[2] 王体强, 王永志, 张雪东, 汤兆光, 段雪锋, . 超重力振动台柔性叠层箱剪切效能评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 719-728.
[3] 李燕, 李同录, 侯晓坤, 李华, 张杰, . 用孔隙分布曲线预测压实黄土非饱和渗透曲 线及其适用范围的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2395-2404.
[4] 姬胜戈, 王宝仲, 杨秀娟, 樊恒辉. 木质素磺酸钙改性分散性土的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2405-2415.
[5] 庄心善, 周睦凯, 陶高梁, 周 荣, 彭承鸿, 林万锋. 循环荷载下发泡聚苯乙烯改良膨胀土动弹性 模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2427-2436.
[6] 葛苗苗, 李宁, 盛岱超, 朱才辉, PINEDA Jubert, . 水力耦合作用下非饱和压实黄土 细观变形机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2437-2448.
[7] 陈汉青, 程桦, 曹广勇, 蔡海兵, 荣传新, 姚直书, . 冻土薄膜水压−吸单元模型的建立及试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2480-2488.
[8] 林志强, 钱建固, 时振昊, . 毛细−吸附作用下考虑孔隙比影响的单/双峰 土体持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2499-2506.
[9] 黄家晟, 王路君, 刘燕晶, 王心博, 朱斌, . 含气土地基热水气力耦合时变行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2507-2517.
[10] 刘丽, 吴羊, 李旭, 赵煜鑫, . 压实度对宽级配土水力特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2545-2555.
[11] 王柳江, 刘斯宏, 赵志杰, 沈超敏, 鲁洋. 土工袋界面动力特性的循环直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1625-1634.
[12] 王英, 张虎元, 童艳梅, 周光平, . 接缝密封材料对缓冲砌块屏障封闭性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1648-1658.
[13] 杨爱武, 杨少朋, 郎瑞卿, 陈子荷, . 轻质固化盐渍土三维力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 593-600.
[14] 雷华阳, 许英刚, 缪姜燕, 刘旭. 动渗耦合作用下软黏土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 601-610.
[15] 吴俊, 征西遥, 杨爱武, 李延波. 矿渣−粉煤灰基地质聚合物固化淤泥质黏土的抗压强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 647-655.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .