岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 857-867.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1087

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

非饱和透明土优先流迁移规律分析

阙云1,翁斌1,蔡松林1,LIU Jin-yuan2   

  1. 1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 瑞尔森大学 土木工程系,加拿大 多伦多
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-17 修回日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 作者简介:阙云,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事边坡稳定与治理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41772297)

Analysis of preferential flow migration in unsaturated transparent soil

QUE Yun1, WENG Bin1, CAI Song-lin1, LIU Jin-yuan2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
  • Received:2021-07-17 Revised:2021-09-17 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772297).

摘要: 为实现土的非饱和优先流迁移可视化,设计立柱装置进行非饱和渗流试验,采用透明土与数字图像处理技术,建立归一化像素强度与透明土饱和度的关系,在此基础上,通过室内模型试验,研究优先流路径连通性与相邻优先流路径旋转角对非饱和土优先流迁移的影响。试验结果表明:基于图像灰度像素强度表征非饱和透明土饱和度方法是可行的;全连通优先流(O-O型)与上连通优先流(O-C型)剖面呈现T型,中心轴剖面饱和度与边缘差异明显,下连通优先流路径(C-O型)中土体油压与基质势不足以使流体进入优先流路径形成优先流,入渗趋势与均匀流一致,O-C型优先流的稳定入渗率和湿润锋推移速度分别为C-O型的1.5倍和1.4倍;相邻O-C型优先流之间区域形成新的优先流,土体达到较高饱和度,增长速率随旋转角的增加而减小,优先流转角为90?、60?、30?时稳定入渗速率分别为均匀流的1.5、1.3、1.2倍;流体受重力影响,转角小的优先流仅沿路径一侧水平渗透,但湿润锋推移速度分别为均匀流的1.3、1.4、1.5倍,相邻优先流相互作用减弱,难以形成新的优先流。

关键词: 透明土, 归一化像素强度, 饱和度, 非饱和优先流, 湿润锋

Abstract: In order to realize the visualization of unsaturated preferential flow migration of soil, a column device was designed to carry out unsaturated seepage tests. The transparent soil and digital image processing technology were used to establish the relationship between the normalized pixel intensity and the saturation of transparent soil. On this basis, the effects of the connectivity of the preferential flow path and the rotation angle of the adjacent preferential flow path on the preferential flow migration in unsaturated soils were studied by conducting laboratory model tests. The results showed that it was feasible to characterize the saturation of unsaturated transparent soils based on the intensity of image gray pixels. The profile of fully connected preferential flow (O-O type) and upper connected preferential flow (O-C type) presented T-shape. The saturation of the central axis profile was obviously different from that of the central edge profile. In the lower connected preferential flow path (C-O type), the soil oil pressure and matrix potential could not make the fluid enter the preferential flow path to form the preferential flow, in which the change of infiltration was consistent with the uniform flow. The stable infiltration rate and the wetting front moving velocity of O-C preferential flow were 1.5 times and 1.4 times of those of the C-O type, respectively. A new preferential flow was formed in the area between adjacent O-C preferential flows. The soil in that area reached higher saturation and the growth rate of saturation decreased with the increase of rotation angle. When the preferential flow rotation angle was 90?, 60? and 30?, the stable infiltration rate was respectively 1.5 times, 1.3 times and 1.2 times that of the uniform flow. As the fluid was affected by gravity, the preferential flow with a small rotation angle only infiltrated horizontally along one side of the path. However, the moving velocity of the wetting front was 1.3 times, 1.4 times, and 1.5 times that of uniform flow, respectively. The interaction between adjacent preferential flows was weakened, so it was difficult to form the new preferential flow.

Key words: transparent soil, normalized pixel intensity, saturation, unsaturated preferential flow, wetting front

中图分类号: 

  • U 416
[1] 郭智辉, 简文彬, 刘青灵, 聂闻. 基于现场原型试验的斜坡降雨入渗分析及 入渗模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1635-1647.
[2] 刘德仁, 徐硕昌, 肖洋, 王旭, 李建东, 张严, . 浸水入渗条件下压实黄土水−气运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3260-3270.
[3] 赵红华, 刘聪, 唐小微, 魏焕卫, 朱丰, . 基于透明土和三维重构技术的空间变形可视 化测量系统的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3170-3180.
[4] 潘永亮, 简文星, 李林均, 林雨秋, 田朋飞. 基于改进Green-Ampt模型的花岗岩 残积土边坡降雨入渗规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2685-2692.
[5] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[6] 简文彬, 黄聪惠, 罗阳华, 聂闻. 降雨入渗下非饱和坡残积土湿润锋运移试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1123-1133.
[7] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[8] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[9] 邹远晶, 韦昌富, 陈合龙, 周家作, 万义钊, . 基于扰动状态概念的含水合物土弹塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2653-2662.
[10] 周东, 刘汉龙, 仉文岗, 丁选明, 杨昌友, . 被动桩侧土体位移场的透明土模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2686-2694.
[11] 谌文武, 刘 伟, 王 娟, 孙冠平, 吴玮江, . 黄土饱和度与B值关系试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 834-842.
[12] 李晶, 陈育民, 方志, 高晗, 飞田哲男, 周葛, . 减饱和砂土缓倾场地的液化性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4352-4360.
[13] 周航, 袁井荣, 刘汉龙, 楚剑, . 矩形桩沉桩挤土效应透明土模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4429-4438.
[14] 张志红, 陈 杨, 张志亮, 田改垒. 高饱和条件下水-力-化耦合模型及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 100-106.
[15] 陈合龙,韦昌富,田慧会,魏厚振,. 气饱和含CO2水合物砂的三轴压缩试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2395-2402.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .