岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3260-3270.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0651

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

浸水入渗条件下压实黄土水−气运移规律试验研究

刘德仁1,徐硕昌1,肖洋3,王旭1, 2,李建东1,张严1   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 兰州交通大学 道桥工程灾害防治技术国家地方联合工程实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070; 3. 佛山市铁路投资建设有限公司,广东 佛山 528000
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-29 修回日期:2021-06-28 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 作者简介:刘德仁,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程及特殊土与寒区工程相关的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41662017)

Experimental study on the law of water-air migration in compacted loess under the condition of immersion infiltration

LIU De-ren1, XU Shuo-chang1, XIAO Yang3, WANG Xu1, 2, LI Jian-dong1, ZHANG Yan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. National and Provincial Joint Engineering Laboratory of Road & Bridge Disaster Prevention and Control, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 3. Foshan Railway Investment Construction Group Co., Ltd., Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China
  • Received:2021-04-29 Revised:2021-06-28 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41662017).

摘要: 压实黄土的干密度和初始含水率对水分入渗过程有显著的影响。以兰州黄土为研究对象,在室内填筑模型开展浸水入渗试验,测试入渗过程中不同深度处的土体体积含水率和孔隙气压力,分析水分入渗时湿润锋和孔隙气压力的变化规律。试验结果表明:土体压实度增大时,入渗率减小,湿润锋面到达测点时间延长,压实度从0.83增大到0.93,不同深度入渗率降幅最高可达21.7%。初始含水率增加时,孔隙水连通性增强,入渗率增大。与初始含水率相比,干密度对水分入渗的影响更为显著;水分入渗过程中孔隙气压力变化呈现连续状态,可以划分为快速变化和缓慢变化两个阶段,浸水过程中最大峰值气压和稳定气压与土体初始含水率和干密度呈正相关关系;入渗率随入渗深度增加而大幅降低,且干密度越大或体积含水率越低,入渗率越小;考虑干密度和初始含水率对孔隙气压力的影响,对Green-Ampt模型进行修正,将入渗深度实测值与计算值进行对比分析,发现修正模型计算值与试验实测值吻合更好。

关键词: 非饱和黄土, 浸水入渗, 湿润锋面, 水?气运移规律, 模型试验

Abstract: The dry density and initial moisture content of compacted loess significantly affect the process of water infiltration. Taking Lanzhou Loess as the research object, the immersion infiltration tests were carried out through filling the test model in indoor. The volumetric water content and pore air pressure of the soil at different depths in the process of infiltration were tested. Then variation laws of wetting front and pore air pressure during water infiltration were analyzed. The test results suggest that when the degree of soil compaction increases, the water infiltration rate decreases, and the time of the wetting front reaching the measuring point is prolonged. The degree of soil compaction increases from 0.83 to 0.93, and the infiltration rate at different depths decreases as high as 21.7%. When the initial water content increases, the pore water connectivity is enhanced and the water infiltration rate increases. The effect of dry density on water infiltration is more significant compared with the initial moisture content. The pore air pressure changes continuously during water infiltration, and the process can be divided into two stages: rapid change and slow change. In the process of water infiltration, the maximum peak air pressure and stable air pressure are positively correlated with the initial moisture content and dry density of soil. However, the infiltration rate decreases greatly with the increase of the infiltration depth, and the bigger the dry density is or the lower the volumetric water content is, the smaller the infiltration rate is. Considering the influence of dry density and initial water content on pore air pressure, the Green-Ampt model was modified. Finally, through comparison and analysis of the measured values with the calculated values of the infiltration depth, it is found that the calculated value of the modified model is in good agreement with the measured value of the test.

Key words: unsaturated loess, immersion infiltration, wetting front, law of water-air migration, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU431
[1] 林丹彤, 胡黎明. 多孔介质中磷负载纳米铁运动特性的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 337-344.
[2] 周光新, 盛谦, 崔臻, 王天强, 马亚丽娜, 付兴伟, . 走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞 破坏机制模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 37-50.
[3] 肖飞, 孔令伟, 刘观仕, 冯衡, 董义义, 曾二贤, . 中密风积沙地层金属装配式基础抗拔模型试 验与承载力改进计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 65-75.
[4] 吴慧明, 赵子荣, 林小飞, 史建乾, 龚晓南, . 主动排水固结法气举降水效应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2151-2159.
[5] 李元海, 刘德柱, 杨硕, 孔骏, . 深部复合地层TBM隧道围岩应力与变形 规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1783-1793.
[6] 王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 曹周红, . 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.
[7] 刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平 承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[8] 饶佩森, 李丹, 孟庆山, 王新志, 付金鑫, 雷学文, . 循环荷载作用下钙质砂地基土压力分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1579-1586.
[9] 郭明伟, 马欢, 杨忠明, 王斌, 董学超, 王水林, . 常泰长江大桥施工阶段大型沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1705-1712.
[10] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[11] 张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[12] 陶志刚, 任树林, 郝宇, 李强, 付强, 何满潮, . 层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果 物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 976-990.
[13] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[14] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[15] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .