岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 37-50.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0765

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞 破坏机制模型试验

周光新1, 2,盛谦1, 2,崔臻1, 2,王天强3,马亚丽娜4,付兴伟5   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;4. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430056; 5. 中国长江三峡集团有限公司,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-23 修回日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 崔臻,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程抗震安全方面的研究。E-mail: zcui@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:zhouguangxin95@163.com
  • 作者简介:周光新,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51779253,No. 52079133);深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室开放基金课题(No. SKLGDUEK1912);长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2019746/KY);暨南大学“重大工程灾害与控制”教育部重点实验室开放基金课题(No. 20200904002)。

Model test of failure mechanism of tunnel with flexible joint crossing active fault under strike-slip fault dislocation

ZHOU Guang-xin1, 2, SHENG Qian1, 2, CUI Zhen1, 2, WANG Tian-qiang3, MA Ya-li-na4, FU Xing-wei5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 4. CCCC Second Highway Consultant Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China; 5. China Three Gorges Corporation,Beijing 100038,China
  • Received:2021-05-23 Revised:2021-09-13 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779253, 52079133), the Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (SKLGDUEK1912), CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2019746/KY) and the MOE Key Laboratory of Major Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering, Jinan University (20200904002).

摘要: 以滇中引水香炉山隧洞为背景工程,通过小尺度物理模型试验,对断层错动模拟过程中的隧洞上覆围岩破裂形态、衬砌破坏形态和裂纹发展、应变分布特征等关键响应特征开展试验分析,深入地研究了走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞的破坏形式及破坏机制。在铰接隧洞抗错断设计参数作用机制方面,详细研究了衬砌节段长度、衬砌厚度、隧洞直径、隧洞轴线与断层带夹角、隧洞断面形式,衬砌材料力学特性等因素对铰接设计隧洞抗断性能的影响。研究结果表明:(1)当跨活断层隧洞不采用铰接设计时,在断层错动作用下隧洞破坏模式为剪切和弯曲组合破坏,衬砌破坏程度严重,存在剥离脱落现象。隧洞截面呈现椭圆化变形,整体坍塌趋势明显;在当前试验中,无铰接隧洞破坏范围达4Wf (Wf为断层带的宽度)。 (2)当跨活断层隧洞采用铰接设计时,在断层错动作用下隧洞整体变形呈现S形,衬砌结构破坏形式为节段间的转动和错台,衬砌节段相对完整,破坏程度较轻;当前试验中,铰接隧洞破坏范围为2.14Wf,相较于无铰接隧洞减少48%,表明铰接设计可改变活断层错断作用下隧洞的变形破坏模式,并减小隧洞结构的损伤范围。(3)铰接设计条件下,隧洞衬砌结构应变峰值主要分布在断层带内,隧洞易发生屈服破坏;与无铰接隧洞相比,铰接隧洞左右边墙纵向最大拉应变减少了56%,纵向最大压应变减少了68%,进一步表明铰接设计可以有效提高隧洞的抗错断性能。(4)在铰接隧洞抗错断设计参数作用机制方面,研究表明增加衬砌厚度、增加衬砌混凝土强度等级、减小节段长度、减小隧洞直径均可提高铰接隧洞的抗错断性能,隧洞穿越断层带的最佳角度为正交,圆形断面相较于三心圆断面可提升铰接隧洞的抗断能力。综上所述,研究成果可以为跨活断裂隧洞工程抗错断措施提供必要的理论参考和技术支持。

关键词: 隧洞工程, 走滑断层, 模型试验, 破坏形式, 铰接设计

Abstract: Based on the fault crossing situation of Xianglushan tunnel of water diversion project, we conducted systematic monitoring and analysis of key mechanical characteristics of tunnel such as surrounding rock rupture pattern, lining damage pattern and crack development, strain distribution characteristics during faults dislocation simulation through indoor physical model tests, and thoroughly studied the damage form and failure mechanism of tunnel with flexible joint crossing active faults under strike-slip fault dislocation. In terms of the mechanism of the design parameters of the flexible joint tunnel to resist faulting, the effects of factors such as liner section length, liner thickness, tunnel diameter, angle between tunnel axis and fault zone, tunnel section form, and mechanical properties of liner materials on the fracture resistance of the flexible joint tunnels were studied in detail. The results of the study show: 1) When the tunnel crossing the active fault is not articulated, the damage pattern presents a combination of shear and bending damage under the fault dislocation, and the lining damage is severe with a phenomenon of peeling off. The tunnel section shows elliptical deformation, and the overall collapse trend is obvious. The damage range of non-articulated tunnel reaches 4Wf (Wf is the width of the fault zone) in this scenario. 2) When the articulated design is adopted in the tunnel crossing the active fault, the deformation of the tunnel shows S-shape under the fault misalignment. The damage of the lining structure is in the form of inter-segment rotation and misalignment, while the lining segments are relatively intact and less damaged. The damage range of the flexible joint tunnel in this scenario is 2.14Wf, which is 48% less than that of the non-flexible joint tunnel, indicating that the articulated design can change the deformation and damage of the tunnel under the active fault dislocation and reduce the damage range of the tunnel structure. 3) Under the condition of articulated design, the maximum strain of the tunnel lining structure is mainly distributed in the fault zone, and the tunnel is prone to yield failure. Compared with the non-flexible joint tunnel, the maximum longitudinal tensile strain and compressive strain in the left and right side walls of the flexible joint tunnel are reduced by 56% and 68% respectively, which further indicates that the articulated design can effectively improve the tunnel’s resistance to fault dislocation. 4) In terms of the mechanism of the design parameters of the articulated tunnel, this paper concludes that the resistance performance of articulated tunnel can be enhanced by increasing the tunnel lining thickness, increasing the concrete strength level of the lining, reducing the length of the section and reducing the diameter of the tunnel. The optimal angle of the tunnel through the fault zone is orthogonal, and the circular section can improve the resistance of the flexible joint tunnel compared with the three-centered circular section. In summary, the research results can provide necessary theoretical reference and technical supports for the anti-faulting measures of cross-active fracture tunnel projects.

Key words: tunnel engineering, strike slip fault, model test, failure pattern, articulated design

中图分类号: 

  • U 451
[1] 林丹彤, 胡黎明. 多孔介质中磷负载纳米铁运动特性的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 337-344.
[2] 肖飞, 孔令伟, 刘观仕, 冯衡, 董义义, 曾二贤, . 中密风积沙地层金属装配式基础抗拔模型试 验与承载力改进计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 65-75.
[3] 吴慧明, 赵子荣, 林小飞, 史建乾, 龚晓南, . 主动排水固结法气举降水效应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2151-2159.
[4] 李元海, 刘德柱, 杨硕, 孔骏, . 深部复合地层TBM隧道围岩应力与变形 规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1783-1793.
[5] 王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 曹周红, . 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.
[6] 刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平 承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[7] 饶佩森, 李丹, 孟庆山, 王新志, 付金鑫, 雷学文, . 循环荷载作用下钙质砂地基土压力分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1579-1586.
[8] 郭明伟, 马欢, 杨忠明, 王斌, 董学超, 王水林, . 常泰长江大桥施工阶段大型沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1705-1712.
[9] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[10] 张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[11] 陶志刚, 任树林, 郝宇, 李强, 付强, 何满潮, . 层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果 物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 976-990.
[12] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[13] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[14] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[15] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .