岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 976-990.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0384

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果 物理模型试验

陶志刚1, 2,任树林1, 2,郝宇3,李强3,付强4,何满潮1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 内蒙古太平矿业有限公司生产技术部,内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015300;4. 中国黄金集团香港有限公司,北京 100011
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-02 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 作者简介:陶志刚,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩体力学与工程灾害控制领域方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41941018);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. 2015QB02)。

Physical model experiment on failure mechanism and NPR anchor cable control effect of layered counter-tilt slope

TAO Zhi-gang1, 2, REN Shu-lin1, 2, HAO Yu3, LI Qiang3, FU Qiang4, HE Man-chao1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Production Technology Department of Inner Mongolia Taiping Mining Co., Ltd., Bayan Nur, Inner Mongdia 015300, China; 4. China National Gold Group Hong Kong Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
  • Received:2020-04-02 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41941018) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015QB02).

摘要: 以内蒙古长山壕露天矿区大规模倾倒失稳反倾边坡为工程背景。首先基于相似理论构建层状反倾边坡地质概化物理模型,开展在未加固、普通锚索加固(PR锚索)及恒阻大变形锚索加固(NPR锚索)3种不同工况条件下边坡控制效果物理模型试验。然后使用红外热成像系统、应变监测系统和数字散斑位移测量系统,对反倾边坡开挖试验全过程的温度场、应变场和位移场进行综合监测。最后,研究层状反倾边坡变形特征和失稳机制,对比分析不同加固对策下的加固效果。研究结果表明:层状反倾边坡变形过程具有明显的“叠合悬臂梁”变形特征,其倾倒机制主要表现为岩层初始裂纹产生、岩层裂纹发育以及滑动面贯通边坡失稳3个阶段。PR锚索在边坡开挖过程中断裂失效,无法抵抗边坡大变形失稳。NPR锚索具有高恒阻、大变形以及吸收能量的超强特性,有效防止反倾边坡倾倒失稳的发生,为边坡工程加固提供了一种新的思路。

关键词: 反倾边坡, 模型试验, 加固对策, NPR锚索, 倾倒变形

Abstract: Taking the large-scale toppling failure counter-tilt slope in Changshanhao open-pit mine in Inner Mongolia as engineering background, a layered counter-tilt slope geological generalized physical model was constructed based on similar theory. Physical model tests were performed under three different conditions: unreinforced, ordinary PR anchor cable reinforcement, and constant resistance and large deformation (NPR) anchor cable reinforcement. Then infrared thermal imaging system, strain monitoring system and digital speckle displacement measurement system were used comprehensively to monitor the temperature field, strain field and displacement field respectively during the entire counter-tilt slope excavation test. Finally the deformation characteristics and instability mechanism of layered counter-tilt slope were investigated, and the reinforcement effects under different reinforcement measures were compared and analyzed. The research results show that the deformation process of counter-tilt slope has obvious deformation characteristics of "superimposed cantilever beam". Its toppling mechanism is mainly manifested in three stages: initial crack formation, crack development, and sliding surface penetrating and slope instability. The PR anchor cable failed during the excavation and could not resist the large deformation of the slope. In contrast, the NPR anchor cable has the characteristics of high constant resistance, large deformation and energy absorption, which can effectively prevent the occurrence of counter-tilt slope instability and provide a new way for slope engineering reinforcement.

Key words: counter-tilt slope, model experiment, reinforcement measures, NPR anchor cable, toppling failure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 吴慧明, 赵子荣, 林小飞, 史建乾, 龚晓南, . 主动排水固结法气举降水效应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2151-2159.
[2] 李元海, 刘德柱, 杨硕, 孔骏, . 深部复合地层TBM隧道围岩应力与变形 规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1783-1793.
[3] 王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 曹周红, . 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.
[4] 刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平 承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[5] 饶佩森, 李丹, 孟庆山, 王新志, 付金鑫, 雷学文, . 循环荷载作用下钙质砂地基土压力分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1579-1586.
[6] 郭明伟, 马欢, 杨忠明, 王斌, 董学超, 王水林, . 常泰长江大桥施工阶段大型沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1705-1712.
[7] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[8] 张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[9] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[10] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[11] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[12] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[13] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[14] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[15] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[2] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[3] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[4] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[5] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[6] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[7] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[8] 丁洲祥,仇玉良,李 涛. 双面排水非线性固结超静孔压的非对称性解析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1829 -1838 .
[9] 田堪良 ,张慧莉 ,马 俊 . 基于强度条件的黄土结构性静力试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1993 -1999 .
[10] 费 康 ,王军军 ,陈 毅 . 桩承式路堤土拱效应简化分析方法[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2408 -2414 .