岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2410-2420.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1957

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于线黏弹性接触的落石冲击地面参量理论研究

陈泰江1,向欣2,章广成1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中国长江三峡集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-18 修回日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-09-12 发布日期:2022-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 向欣,男,1982年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土体评价与治理方面的工作。E-mail: xiang_xin@ctg.com.cn E-mail:Chendjiang@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈泰江,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2018YFC1505306);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41877263)。

Characteristic parameters theoretical analysis of rockfall impact on ground based on linear viscoelastic contact theory

CHEN Tai-jiang1, XIANG Xin2, ZHANG Guang-cheng1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. China Three Gorges Corporation Limited, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2021-11-18 Revised:2022-04-28 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Research Project of China (2018YFC1505306) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877263).

摘要:

落石与坡面或者防护结构接触过程中冲击参量随时间变化特征是描述落石碰撞过程的重要指标,对于揭示落石与坡面相互作用机制以及采取合理的防护措施具有重要的意义。在现有的相关设计规范中,并没有给出关于落石冲击力时程关系的计算方法,仅参照有关规范或经验方法确定一个落石最大冲击力值。为此,首先基于线黏弹性接触理论,建立落石冲击地面力学模型,根据位移-速度组合初始条件以及速度-加速度组合初始条件分别推导得到两种落石冲击特征参量理论解析解;然后基于 ANSYS/LS-DYNA 非线性动力学软件,建立落石冲击地面三维数值模型,研究球体落石冲击地面力学特点;最后将理论结果对比室内试验和已有的研究成果,得出以下结论:(1)Hertz 弹性接触理论结果中各参量变化在加载阶段和恢复阶段均呈现对称的趋势,速度、加速度初始条件下的落石冲击特征参量和动力有限元法非常接近,而位移-速度初始条件组合并不适用于研究落石冲击下的动力特征;(2)不同速度和下落高度下,落石最大冲击力值随落石下落高度和冲击速度的增大而增加,而落石冲击作用时间随下落高度和冲击速度的增加而减小;(3)计算结果得到的落石最大冲击力以及落石冲击作用时间与室内试验结果和已有成果相接近,相比室内试验和有限元结果的震荡性,此结果更能体现落石冲击力变化规律;  (4)多种冲击速度下,对比不同方法得到的落石最大冲击力,可知计算结果均在各种冲击力计算结果的范围内,具有很好的可靠性。考虑到现有研究理论的不足,难以求解落石冲击力时程关系,求解结果丰富了落石碰撞理论,可以指导工程有关落石灾害的防护设计。

关键词: 落石, 碰撞, 接触理论, 冲击力, 理论解析

Abstract:

The time variation characteristic of impact parameters in the contact process between rockfall and slope or protective structure is an important index to describe the process of rockfall collision. It is significant to reveal the interaction mechanism between rockfall and slope and to take reasonable protective measures. In the existing relevant design specifications, there are no calculation methods for the time history relationship of rockfall impact, and only a maximum value of rockfall impact force is determined by referring to relevant specifications or empirical methods. Therefore, based on the linear viscoelastic contact theory, a mechanical model of rockfall impact on the ground is established firstly; according to the different combined initial conditions, two theoretical analytical solutions of the characteristic parameters of rockfall impact are derived respectively. Then, based on the ANSYS/LS-DYNA nonlinear dynamics software, a three-dimensional numerical model is established, and the mechanical characteristics of the rockfalls impacting the ground at different speeds are studied. Finally, the theoretical results of this paper are compared with the indoor test and existing research results, and the following conclusions are drawn: 1) According to the Hertz elastic contact theory, the changes of various parameters show a symmetrical trend during the loading stage and the recovery stage. The characteristic parameters of rockfall impact under the initial condition combination of velocity-acceleration in this paper are very close to the dynamic finite element method, and the initial condition combination of displacement-velocity is not suitable for research on dynamic characteristics under the impact of rockfall. 2) At different speeds and falling heights, the maximum impact force value of the rockfall increases with the increase of the falling height and impact velocity of the rockfall, while the impact time of the rockfall decreases with the increase of the falling height and impact velocity. 3) The maximum impact force and impact time of the rockfall obtained by the calculation in this paper are close to the indoor test and the existing results. Compared with the oscillation of the indoor test and the finite element results, the results of this paper can better reflect the change law of the impact force of the rockfall.          4) Comparing the maximum impact force of rockfall obtained by different methods under a variety of impact speeds, the calculation results in this paper are all within the range of various impact force calculation results, and have good reliability. The results of this paper enrich the rockfall collision theory, which can guide the protection design of engineering related to rockfall disasters.

Key words: rockfall, collision, contact theory, impact force, theoretical analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU435
[1] 许江, 程亮, 魏仁忠, 彭守建, 周斌, 杨海林, . T型巷道中突出煤−瓦斯两相流动力学试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1423-1433.
[2] 沈志平, 刘慧, 付君宜, 孙秀东. 力量速度法和力量平方法量测动力 触探锤击能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3127-3134.
[3] 苏宇宸, 王媛, 唐辉明, 仲恒, 李欣, 刘超福, 吕亚茹, . 落石连续冲击下废弃混凝土垫层 宏细观缓冲机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2698-2706.
[4] 刘国阳, 孟海怡, 宁宝宽, 李石宝, . 基于三维非连续变形分析的巨石崩塌运动研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 246-256.
[5] 陈泰江, 章广成, 向欣, . 落石冲击混凝土棚洞力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 277-285.
[6] 姬中民, 唐一举, 伍法权, 刘静, 陈天立, 陈志坚. 落石形状和尺寸对恢复系数影响的室内试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 665-672.
[7] 刘昌, 张顶立, 张素磊, 房倩, 方黄城, . 考虑围岩流变及衬砌劣化特性的隧道 长期服役性能解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2795-2807.
[8] 叶阳, 曾亚武, 杜欣, 孙翰卿, 陈曦, . 球形砾石碰撞损伤破碎三维离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[9] 程亮, 许江, 周斌, 彭守建, 闫发志, 杨孝波, 杨文健. 不同瓦斯压力对煤与瓦斯突出两相流 传播规律的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2619-2626.
[10] 王东坡, 张小梅. 泥石流冲击弧形拦挡坝动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3851-3861.
[11] 王友彪, 姚昌荣, 刘赛智, 李亚东, 张 迅. 泥石流对桥墩冲击力的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[12] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[13] 胡 杰,李术才,石少帅,李利平,刘进佩,刘洪亮,贺 鹏. 隧道仰坡落石冲击模型试验研究与机制探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2527-2536.
[14] 康 成, 梅国雄, 梁荣柱, 吴文兵, 方宇翔, 柯宅邦, . 地表临时堆载诱发下既有盾构隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4605-4616.
[15] 张治国,马兵兵,黄茂松,徐晓洋,. 山区滑坡诱发既有隧道受力变形影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3555-3564.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .