岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 572-580.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0935

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土压平衡盾构渗流场解析解及喷涌判别研究

余俊,郑靖凡,杨鑫歆,李东凯   

  1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-19 接受日期:2022-11-19 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 作者简介:余俊,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52078496)。

Analytical solution of seepage field and identification of spewing in earth pressure balance shield

YU Jun, ZHENG Jing-fan, YANG Xin-xin, LI Dong-kai   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2022-06-19 Accepted:2022-11-19 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078496).

摘要: 考虑土压平衡盾构土舱的二维渗流效应,用解析方法分析了土压平衡盾构的喷涌问题。将土舱渗流场划分成两个区域,利用分离变量法并结合区域间连续条件得到土舱水头显式级数解,将螺旋输送机内流场视为一维渗流,通过土舱与螺旋输送机交界面水流量及水头连续条件得到盾构的渗流场解析解。分别将土舱和螺旋输送机渗流场解析解与数值软件计算结果和试验结果进行对比,结果吻合较好,验证了解的正确性。分析盾构及土层参数对螺旋输送机排土口水流量及水压力的影响,分析结果表明:在螺旋输送机排土口内外水压力差为0的情况下,螺旋输送机内水流量及水压力与刀盘面中心水头近似线性关系;增加螺旋输送机长度和倾角、减小螺旋输送机的直径有利于防止喷涌。基于已有的喷涌研究成果,给出了典型盾构喷涌判别图。通过对盾构喷涌实例进行判别,并与盾构一维解析解的喷涌判别结果进行对比,证明基于本解析解的喷涌判别更为准确。

关键词: 土压平衡盾构, 喷涌, 地下水流量, 水压力, 螺旋输送机

Abstract: Considering the two-dimensional seepage effect of chamber of earth pressure balance shield, the spewing problem of earth pressure balance shield is analyzed by using an analytical method. The seepage field of chamber is divided into two regions, and the water head of the chamber is obtained in the form of an explicit hierarchical solution by using the method of separation variables and combining the conditions of continuity between regions. The flow in the screw conveyor is regarded as one-dimensional seepage, and the analytical solution of the seepage field of the shield is obtained based on the water flow and head continuity conditions at the intersection of the chamber and the screw conveyor. The analytical solutions of the seepage field of the chamber and the screw conveyor are compared with the numerical software calculation results and test results respectively, and the results are in good agreement to verify the correctness of the solution. Analyzing the impact of shield and soil parameters on the screw conveyor discharge water flow and water pressure, it is found that a water pressure difference of 0 between the inside and outside of the soil discharge port of the screw conveyor, there is an approximately linear relationship between the screw conveyor water flow and water pressure and water head at cutter surface center; increasing the length of the screw conveyor and inclination angle, and reducing the diameter of the screw conveyor are conducive to prevent spewing. Based on the existing research results of the spewing, a typical shield spewing discriminant map is given. Through discriminating the shield spewing example, and comparing it with the spewing discrimination results of one-dimensional analytical solution of the shield, it is proved that discrimination based on this analytical solution is more accurate.

Key words: earth pressure balance shield (EPBS), spewing, groundwater flow, water pressure, screw conveyor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[2] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[3] 简涛, 孔令伟, 柏巍, 舒荣军, . 基于耗散能量的饱和黄土动孔压模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2238-2248.
[4] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
[5] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[6] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[7] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[8] 陈平山, 吕卫清, 梁小丛, 周红星, 王婧, 马佳钧, . 含细粒珊瑚土抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 337-344.
[9] 何文, 陈豪, 郑场松, 卢博凯, 王慢慢, . 尾矿渗透破坏及其导波监测试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 415-424.
[10] 陈柏林, 杨文君, 谢强, 彭海游, 叶晓明, 檀康, 周鹏, . 沿缓倾软弱外倾结构面滑动的主动岩石压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3272-3279.
[11] 李桐, 陈明, 叶志伟, 卢文波, 魏东, 郑祥, . 混凝土含水裂隙中爆炸压力传播的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 205-213.
[12] 张雷, 吕延栋, 王炳辉, 金丹丹, 竺明星, 方晨, . 絮凝−真空−电渗联合加固滩涂软土的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2383-2390.
[13] 丁瑜, 贾羽, 王晅, 张家生, 陈晓斌, 罗昊, 张宇, . 颗粒级配及初始干密度对路基翻浆冒泥特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2539-2549.
[14] 杜宇, 刘松玉, 祝刘文, 邹海峰, 蔡国军, . 基于孔压静力触探试验的水运工程土分类方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1353-1363.
[15] 李新明, 贾亚垒, 王志留, 尹松. 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的应变速率效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3327-3334.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢应发,陈朱蕾,谢文良,吕志中. 垃圾卫生填埋中的一些岩土工程技术[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 91 -98 .
[2] 王志萍,胡敏云,夏玲涛. 垃圾填土压缩特性的室内试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1681 -1686 .
[3] 贾 强,应惠清,张 鑫. 锚杆静压桩技术在既有建筑物增设地下空间中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2053 -2057 .
[4] 许 凯,雷学文,孟庆山,梁 鹏. 堆石坝非达西渗流场分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 562 -567 .
[5] 黄俊杰 ,苏 谦 ,钟 彪 ,白 皓 ,王武斌 . 多年冻土斜坡路基失稳变形影响因素及特征研究[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 703 -710 .
[6] 胡万雨 ,陈向浩 ,林 江 ,况磊强 . 瀑布沟水电站砾石土心墙初次蓄水期原位钻孔渗流试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1259 -1263 .
[7] 丁振洲,郑颖人,李利晟. 膨胀力变化规律试验研究[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1328 -1332 .
[8] 陈永贵,邹银生,张可能,邓飞跃. 重金属污染物在黏土固化注浆帷幕中的运移规律[J]. , 2007, 28(12): 2583 -2589 .
[9] 柴华友 ,白世伟 ,刘明贵 ,卢应发 . 瑞利波特性刚度矩阵分析方法[J]. , 2006, 27(2): 209 -213 .
[10] 李 飒,孙兴松,要明伦. 混黏土的粉土、粉砂室内试验液化判别标准的研究[J]. , 2006, 27(3): 360 -364 .