岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 476-484.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1736

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环加卸载下直墙拱形巷(隧)道应力松弛特性试验研究

刘啸1,张晓君1, 2,魏金祝3,何俊玲1,王靖涛1   

  1. 1. 山东理工大学 资源与环境工程学院,山东 淄博 255000;2. 山东理工大学 矿山工程技术研究所,山东 淄博 255000; 3. 山东省冶金设计院股份有限公司,山东 济南 250101
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-14 接受日期:2023-02-21 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 张晓君,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程与采矿工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:zhangxj@sdut.edu.cn E-mail:liuxiao0073@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘啸,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程与采矿工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2020ME098);国家自然科学基金(No.51904178)

Experimental study on the stress relaxation characteristics in straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) under cyclic loading and unloading

LIU Xiao1, ZHANG Xiao-jun1, 2, WEI Jin-zhu3, HE Jun-ling1, WANG Jing-tao1   

  1. 1.School of Resources and Environment,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong 255000,China; 2. Institute of Mining Engineering and Technology,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong 255000,China; 3. Shandong Province Metallurgical Engineering Co., Ltd.,Jinan,Shandong 250101,China
  • Received:2022-06-14 Accepted:2023-02-21 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ME098) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904178) .

摘要: 针对硬岩应力松弛特性及岩爆研究的不足,开展了低、中、高载荷下的循环加卸载直墙拱形巷(隧)道应力松弛过程试验,得出了应力松弛规律,建立了应力松弛模型,探讨了应力松弛机制。结果表明:在低载荷下的循环加卸载直墙拱形巷(隧)道应力松弛过程均呈现出迅速衰减、逐渐衰减和稳定3个演化阶段,应力松弛规律一致,但随着循环次数的增加,应力松弛时间放缓,应力衰减损失程度在降低;低载荷下的应力松弛过程是巷(隧)道围岩拉应力和压应力同时衰减的过程,内部没有损伤产生,整体未产生破裂;在中等载荷下的循环加卸载直墙拱形巷(隧)道围岩应力松弛过程同样呈现出迅速衰减、逐渐衰减和稳定3个演化阶段,随着循环次数的增加总体上呈现应力松弛时间放缓的趋势,最终同样表现为巷(隧)道围岩拉应力和压应力同时衰减的过程;与低载荷下相比,中等载荷下的应力松弛过程变慢,内部有损伤产生,但后续循环未导致围岩破坏;在高载荷下的直墙拱形巷(隧)道围岩呈现拉应力持续增加和压应力持续减小的过程,巷(隧)道持续损伤破裂,侧帮产生层爆,最终形成V型爆坑,整体呈现两次明显爆裂破坏;采用分数阶微积分理论来描述循环加卸载情况下的应力松弛过程,建立了分数阶模型即应力松弛方程,拟合效果基本吻合;定义了应力松弛度,可以完全反映应力松弛全过程及松弛程度;工程上应采取措施阻止岩爆岩体松弛过程变形发展到临界状态。研究结果对岩爆机制、预测预警及硬岩长期稳定性分析等具有很好的指导和借鉴意义。

关键词: 直墙拱形巷(隧)道, 循环加卸载, 应力松弛, 拉应力, 岩爆

Abstract: Aiming at the insufficiency of hard rock stress relaxation characteristics and rock burst research, we carried out cyclic loading and unloading tests on stress relaxation process of straight-wall-top-arch roadways (tunnels) under low, medium and high loads, derived the stress relaxation law, established the stress relaxation model, and explored the stress relaxation mechanism. The test results show that the stress relaxation process of the straight-wall-top-arch roadways (tunnels) subjected to cyclic loading and unloading under a low load presents three evolution stages: rapid decay, gradual decay and stability, and the stress relaxation trends are consistent;, the time required for stress relaxation increases, and the degree of stress attenuation loss decreases as the number of cycles increases; the stress relaxation process under low load is a process of simultaneous attenuation of tensile and compressive stresses in the surrounding rock of roadway(tunnel), with no internal damage and no overall rupture. Under a medium load, the stress relaxation process of straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) subjected to cyclic loading and unloading also presents three evolutionary stages similar to those under the low load; compared with low load scenario, the stress relaxation process lasts longer under the medium load and internal damage occurs, but subsequent cycles do not lead to surrounding rock failure. Under a high load, the surrounding rock of the straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) presents a continuous increase in tensile stress and a continuous decrease in compressive stress, the roadway (tunnel) continues to damage and rupture, and the side walls produce stratified burst, eventually forming a V-shaped burst crater, overall, two significant burst failures can be observed. The fractional-order calculus theory is used to describe the stress relaxation process under cyclic loading and unloading. A fractional-order model, namely the stress relaxation equation, is established, and the fitting effect is basically basically satisfactory. Furthermore, we define the degree of stress relaxation that fully can depict the whole process of stress relaxation and the degree of relaxation. Based on the findings of this paper, engineering measures should be taken to stop the deformation of the relaxation process of the rock explosion rock mass from developing to a critical state in engineering practice.

Key words: straight-wall-top-arch roadway(tunnel);cyclic loading and unloading;stress relaxation, tensile stress, rockburst

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[2] 石磊, 张希巍, . 超深钻岩芯地质环境真三轴试验装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2161-2169.
[3] 张平, 任松, 张闯, 吴斐, 隆能增, 李凯鑫, . 循环扰动和高温作用下砂岩的岩爆倾向性及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 771-783.
[4] 张光, 吴顺川, 张诗淮, 郭沛, . 砂岩单轴压缩试验P波速度层析成像及声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 483-496.
[5] 罗丹旎, 卢思航, 苏国韶, 陶洪辉, . 含预制单裂隙花岗岩的真三轴单面临空岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 75-87.
[6] 刘汉香, 别鹏飞, 李欣, 魏应松, 王铭萱, . 三轴多级循环加卸载下千枚岩的力学特性及 能量耗散特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 265-274.
[7] 梁伟章, 赵国彦. 深部硬岩矿山岩爆风险防控技术研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 454-468.
[8] 王炀, 刘冬桥, 任富强, 胡天祥, 何满潮, . 动载与长轴位置关系对椭圆形洞室围岩冲 击岩爆影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2347-2359.
[9] 杨科, 张寨男, 池小楼, 吕鑫, 魏祯, 刘文杰, . 循环载荷下含水砂岩裂纹演化与损伤特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1791-1802.
[10] 赵宏刚, 张东明, 蒋长宝, 余北辰, . 考虑软弱夹层厚度的岩体力学响应及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 969-980.
[11] 陈树峰, 孔令伟, 罗滔, . 超固结粉质黏土水平应力释放特征与 静止侧压力系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 160-168.
[12] 徐鼎平, 郭广涛, 夏跃林, 柳秀洋, 江权, 李邵军, 李治国, . 高应力强卸荷下双江口花岗岩岩爆中间 主应力效应宏细观试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2375-2386.
[13] 陈昌富, 杜成, 朱世民, 何仕林, 张根宝, . 红黏土土层锚杆界面剪切应力松弛试验及其模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1201-1209.
[14] 刘成禹, 罗洪林, 李红军, 张向向, . 岩脉型岩爆的形成机制及控制技术—— 以乌兹别克斯坦卡姆奇克隧道为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1413-1423.
[15] 邓华锋, 方景成, 李建林, 李冠野, 齐豫, 许晓亮. 水-岩和循环加卸载次序作用下 砂岩动力特性损伤演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 343-351.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[2] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[3] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[4] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[5] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .
[6] 卫振海 ,王梦恕 ,张顶立 . 土结构强度模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 40 -46 .
[7] 贺怀建 ,白世伟 ,赵新华 ,陈 健 . 三维地层模型中地层划分的探讨[J]. , 2002, 23(5): 637 -639 .
[8] 吴大志 ,董天乐 ,蔡袁强 ,刘飞禹 . 横观各向同性饱和地基中埋置刚性圆柱基础的扭转振动[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 733 -737 .
[9] 李守定 ,李 晓 ,张年学 ,刘艳辉 , . 三峡库区宝塔滑坡泥化夹层泥化过程的水岩作用[J]. , 2006, 27(10): 1841 -1846 .
[10] 李文江,刘志春,朱永全. 铁路站场下暗挖隧道地表沉降控制基准研究[J]. , 2005, 26(7): 1165 -1169 .