›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 939-944.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲击压实路基黄土的微观特征研究

王生新1, 2,韩文峰1, 3,谌文武1, 2,梁庆国1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,兰州 730000;2. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,兰州 730000; 3. 天津城市建设学院 土木工程系,天津 300381
  • 收稿日期:2004-09-19 出版日期:2006-06-10 发布日期:2013-11-14
  • 作者简介:王生新,男,1966年生,博士研究生,高级工程师,注册土木工程师,主要从事地基处理方面的科研工作。
  • 基金资助:

    交通部西部交通建设科技资助项目(2001-318-000-18):黄土路基压实技术

Microstudy on roadbed loess improvement by impact compaction technology

WANG Sheng-xin1, 2, HAN Wen-feng1, 3, CHEN Wen-wu1, 2, LIANG Qing-guo1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disasterand Environment, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin College of Urban Construction, Tianjin 300381, China
  • Received:2004-09-19 Online:2006-06-10 Published:2013-11-14

摘要: 采用扫描电镜和压汞试验研究了天然黄土和冲击压实8~40遍路基黄土的微观结构和孔隙特征。结果表明:天然黄土和冲击压实8遍的路基黄土,其微结构以粒状架空结构为主;冲击压实16~40遍,土的微结构变成粒状镶嵌结构。冲击压实16遍前后,土的孔隙直径分布在0.006~164 μm之间,平均孔径从0.767 9 μm降低到0.0 711 μm,中等孔径从5.264 μm减少到0.568 4 μm;但孔隙表面积从0.624 m2/g增加到7.517 m2/g。孔径分布在10 μm和2 μm处出现分界值,16遍前2

关键词: 路基黄土, 冲击压实, 扫描电镜, 压汞分析, 孔径分布

Abstract: The microstructure and pore characteristics of natural loess and roadbed loess improved by impact compaction after 8-40 compactor passes were qualitatively and quantitatively studied on the basis of the test results from scanning electron microscope (SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry(MIP). The results show that open structure is the main structure type of natural loess and roadbed loess after 8 compactor passes; and inter-particle inlaid structure is the main type of roadbed loess after 16-40 compactor passes; The pore size distribution is within the range of 0.006~164 μm before and after 16 compactor passes, the average pore diameter has been lowered from 0.767 9 μm to 0.071 1 μm; the median pore diameter has been decreased from 5.264 μm to 0.5684 μm. The pore surface area has been increased from 0.624 m2/g to 7.517 m2/g; there are two dividing pore diameters of 10 μm and 2 μm for all types of loess, and for the loess before 16 compactor passes, the pores with diameter between 2 to 10μm cover 67.53 % of all the pores, while the pores with diameter less than 2μm cover 68.07 % for loess after 16 compactor passes. Therefore the optimum compactor pass is 16 and the improvement mechanism of impact compaction is change in loess microstructure and increase of micropores.

Key words: roadbed loess, impact compaction, scanning electron microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), pore size distribution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 41
[1] 朱振南, 田 红, 董楠楠, 窦 斌, 陈 劲, 张 宇, 王炳红, . 高温花岗岩遇水冷却后物理力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 169-176.
[2] 叶万军,李长清,杨更社,刘忠祥,彭瑞奇. 冻融环境下黄土体结构损伤的尺度效应[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2336-2343.
[3] 陈 毅,张虎元,杨 龙, . 遗址土劣化进程中微观结构变化的类比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4117-4124.
[4] 孙德安,何家浩,高 游. 广吸力范围内压实红黏土的强度特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 51-56.
[5] 陈 波,孙德安,高 游,李 健,. 上海软黏土的孔径分布试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2523-2530.
[6] 刘晋铭,欧忠文,肖寒冰,莫金川,杨康辉. 功能组分对固化土早期强度的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 755-761.
[7] 武亚军,牛 坤,唐海峰,胡志刚,陆逸天,. 药剂真空预压法处理工程废浆中生石灰的增渗作用[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3453-3461.
[8] 唐 琳,唐晓武,孙 凯, . 不等轴双向拉伸无纺织物孔径变化理论研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3597-3603.
[9] 崔明娟,郑俊杰,赖汉江. 菌液注射方式对微生物固化砂土动力特性影响试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3173-3178.
[10] 崔明娟,郑俊杰,赖汉江. 颗粒粒径对微生物固化砂土强度影响的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 397-402.
[11] 张 芹 ,颜荣涛 ,韦昌富 ,杨德欢 ,于明波 ,杨丽雅 , . 孔隙溶液对粉质黏土界限含水率的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 558-52.
[12] 白 彬 ,唐晓武 ,唐 琳 ,曲绍兴,. 等双轴拉应变对无纺土工织物孔径变化的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1615-1621.
[13] 万 勇 ,薛 强 ,吴 彦 ,赵立业,. 干湿循环作用下压实黏土力学特性与微观机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2815-2824.
[14] 王彦兵 ,王思敬 ,李 黎 ,王旭东 ,李最雄,. 硅酸钾对遗址土的渗透加固机制及改进特性研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 696-704.
[15] 曹 洋 ,周 建 ,严佳佳 , . 考虑循环应力比和频率影响的动荷载下软土微观结构研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 735-743.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏龙海,王明年,赵东平,吉艳雷. 翔安海底公路隧道陆域段变形控制措施研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 577 -581 .
[2] 符策简. 高含盐粉土的力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 193 -197 .
[3] 高树生,钱根宝,王 彬,杨作明,刘华勋. 新疆火山岩双重介质气藏供排气机理数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 276 -280 .
[4] 吕玺琳,黄茂松,钱建固. 真三轴状态下砂土的强度参数[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 981 -984 .
[5] 李雄威,孔令伟,郭爱国. 气候影响下膨胀土工程性质的原位响应特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2069 -2074 .
[6] 宋勇军,胡 伟,王德胜,周军林. 基于修正剑桥模型的挤密桩挤土效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811 -814 .
[7] 孙德安,孟德林,孙文静,刘月妙. 两种膨润土的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 973 -0978 .
[8] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[9] 陈新泽. 基于FLAC3D预应力锚拉桩作用机制和加固效果研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 499 -504 .
[10] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,王 超. 深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .