面板坝垂直缝及止水失效渗流场有限元模拟

›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (S1): 145-148.

面板坝垂直缝及止水失效渗流场有限元模拟

潘少华，毛新莹，白正雄

武汉大学水利水电学院，武汉 430072

收稿日期:2008-06-27 出版日期:2008-11-11 发布日期:2016-04-15
作者简介:潘少华，男，1985年生，硕士研究生，主要从事水工结构三维仿真计算与研究工作

Seepage field finite element simulation of faced rockfill dam under cases of vertical joints and seal failure

PAN Shao-hua, MAO Xin-ying, BAI Zheng-xiong

School of Water Resources and Hydropower, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2008-06-27 Online:2008-11-11 Published:2016-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以金川面板堆石坝为例，用有限元方法计算了当面板缝及止水局部失效时各种工况下的渗流场，系统分析了大坝在面板垂直缝及止水局部失效后的稳定渗流场的规律和特点。采用无厚度的二维平面单元来模拟面板垂直缝及止水结构周边缝，同时采用理论上严密的Signorini型变分不等式方法进行求解，此方法能对渗流出渗点和浸润线进行准确定位。通过分析计算结果，指出了面板缝及止水结构周边缝的失效位置，失效缝宽对等势线、浸润线以及渗漏量的影响。为面板堆石坝接缝的设计提供参考。

关键词: 金川水电站, 面板堆石坝, 裂缝, 止水失效, 渗流场

Abstract: The seepage fields and stability of concrete face rockfill dam(CFRD) in Jinchuan Hydropower Station are calculated by FEM, when vertical joints and seal failure x occurred in the face plate. Two-dimensional plane element without thickness simulating the vertical joints and the sealing peripheral fractures is adopted; meanwhile, Signorini’s variational inequality is adopted to solve the problem. This method can locate the frozen points and the saturation line accurately. The results show that the saturation line and equipotential line are affected by the position and the width of the vertical joints and the sealing peripheral joints. Some references will be given for designing the joints of CFRD.

Key words: Jinchuan Hydropower Station, concrete face rockfill dam, crack, seal failure, seepage field

中图分类号:

TV 223

潘少华，毛新莹，白正雄. 面板坝垂直缝及止水失效渗流场有限元模拟[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 145-148.

PAN Shao-hua, MAO Xin-ying, BAI Zheng-xiong. Seepage field finite element simulation of faced rockfill dam under cases of vertical joints and seal failure[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 145-148.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张盛, 王龙飞, 常旭, 王东坤, 王小良, 乔洋, . 中心直裂纹半圆盘试样的石灰岩断裂韧度尺寸效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1740-1749.
[2]	张帆, 马耕, 冯丹, . 大尺寸真三轴煤岩水力压裂模拟试验与裂缝扩展分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1890-1897.
[3]	谢强, 田大浪, 刘金辉, 张建华, 张志斌, . 土质边坡的饱和−非饱和渗流分析及特殊应力修正[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 879-892.
[4]	熊仲明, 张朝, 陈轩. 地震作用下地裂缝场地地震动参数试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 421-428.
[5]	李玉丹，董平川，周大伟，吴子森，汪洋，曹耐. 页岩气藏微裂缝表观渗透率动态模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 42-50.
[6]	王志荣，贺平，郭志伟，王永春. 考虑裂缝特性指标的煤层气“垂直井”起裂压力计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 369-377.
[7]	蔡奇鹏，吴宏伟，胡平，陈星欣，李升才,. 跨越走滑断层黏土地层动力响应离心机试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432.
[8]	张晨阳，张明，张泰丽，孙强，杨龙，. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[9]	姚虞，王睿，刘天云，张建民，. 高面板坝地震动非一致输入响应规律[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2259-2266.
[10]	王洪波，张庆松，刘人太，李术才，张乐文，郑卓，张连震. 基于压水试验的地层渗流场反分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 985-992.
[11]	罗跃，叶淑君，吴吉春，. 三维区域地面沉降数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1063-1070.
[12]	夏磊，曾亚武,. 基于PFC2D数值模拟的交替压裂中应力阴影效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4269-4277.
[13]	王海柱，李根生，贺振国，沈忠厚，李小江，张祯祥，王猛，杨兵，郑永，石鲁杰,. 超临界CO2岩石致裂机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3589-3596.
[14]	姜婷婷，张建华，黄刚, . 煤岩水力压裂裂缝扩展形态试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3677-3684.
[15]	王志良，年玉泽，申林方，徐则民,. 植被发育斜坡土体大孔隙三维重构模型渗流场的LBM数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3821-3829.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed